Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (30) (remove)
Year of publication
- 2019 (30) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (28)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (1)
- Postprint (1)
Keywords
- syntax (30) (remove)
Institute
This study addresses the question of whether and how growing up with more than one language shapes a child's language impairment. Our focus is on Specific Language Impairment (SLI) in bilingual (Turkish-German) children. We specifically investigated a range of phenomena related to the so-called CP (Complementizer Phrase) in German, the hierarchically highest layer of syntactic clause structure, which has been argued to be particularly affected in children with SLI. Spontaneous speech data were examined from bilingual children with SLI in comparison to two comparison groups: (i) typically-developing bilingual children, (ii) monolingual children with SLI. We found that despite persistent difficulty with subject-verb agreement, the two groups of children with SLI did not show any impairment of the CP-domain. We conclude that while subject-verb agreement is a suitable linguistic marker of SLI in German-speaking children, for both monolingual and bilingual ones, 'vulnerability of the CP-domain' is not.
Splits and Birds
(2019)
Experimenting with Lurchi
(2019)
Accusative Unaccusatives
(2019)
On uninterpretable features
(2019)
Verum focus and negation
(2019)
On doubling unconditionals
(2019)
A form-function mismatch?
(2019)
Leben mit Paradoxien
(2019)
Bienenfresserortungsversuch
(2019)
The instrumental -er suffix
(2019)
Preface
(2019)
Of Trees and Birds
(2019)
Gisbert Fanselow’s work has been invaluable and inspiring to many researchers working on syntax, morphology, and information structure, both from a theoretical and from an experimental perspective. This volume comprises a collection of articles dedicated to Gisbert on the occasion of his 60th birthday, covering a range of topics from these areas and beyond. The contributions have in common that in a broad sense they have to do with language structures (and thus trees), and that in a more specific sense they have to do with birds. They thus cover two of Gisbert’s major interests in- and outside of the linguistic world (and perhaps even at the interface).