Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (35853)
- Doctoral Thesis (6499)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (5562)
- Postprint (3296)
- Review (2291)
- Part of a Book (1069)
- Other (922)
- Preprint (567)
- Conference Proceeding (551)
- Part of Periodical (527)
Language
- English (30820)
- German (26073)
- Spanish (363)
- French (330)
- Italian (115)
- Russian (112)
- Multiple languages (70)
- Hebrew (36)
- Portuguese (25)
- Polish (24)
Keywords
- Germany (202)
- climate change (183)
- Deutschland (142)
- machine learning (87)
- European Union (79)
- diffusion (78)
- Sprachtherapie (77)
- Migration (74)
- morphology (74)
- Logopädie (73)
Institute
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (5472)
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (5442)
- Institut für Geowissenschaften (3668)
- Institut für Chemie (3484)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (2645)
- Historisches Institut (2515)
- Department Psychologie (2352)
- Institut für Mathematik (2150)
- Institut für Romanistik (2108)
- Sozialwissenschaften (1883)
Importance Alcohol consumption (AC) leads to death and disability worldwide. Ongoing discussions on potential negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on AC need to be informed by real-world evidence.
Objective To examine whether lockdown measures are associated with AC and consumption-related temporal and psychological within-person mechanisms.
Design, Setting, and Participants This quantitative, intensive, longitudinal cohort study recruited 1743 participants from 3 sites from February 20, 2020, to February 28, 2021. Data were provided before and within the second lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: before lockdown (October 2 to November 1, 2020); light lockdown (November 2 to December 15, 2020); and hard lockdown (December 16, 2020, to February 28, 2021).
Main Outcomes and Measures Daily ratings of AC (main outcome) captured during 3 lockdown phases (main variable) and temporal (weekends and holidays) and psychological (social isolation and drinking intention) correlates.
Results Of the 1743 screened participants, 189 (119 [63.0%] male; median [IQR] age, 37 [27.5-52.0] years) with at least 2 alcohol use disorder (AUD) criteria according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) yet without the need for medically supervised alcohol withdrawal were included. These individuals provided 14 694 smartphone ratings from October 2020 through February 2021. Multilevel modeling revealed significantly higher AC (grams of alcohol per day) on weekend days vs weekdays (β = 11.39; 95% CI, 10.00-12.77; P < .001). Alcohol consumption was above the overall average on Christmas (β = 26.82; 95% CI, 21.87-31.77; P < .001) and New Year’s Eve (β = 66.88; 95% CI, 59.22-74.54; P < .001). During the hard lockdown, perceived social isolation was significantly higher (β = 0.12; 95% CI, 0.06-0.15; P < .001), but AC was significantly lower (β = −5.45; 95% CI, −8.00 to −2.90; P = .001). Independent of lockdown, intention to drink less alcohol was associated with lower AC (β = −11.10; 95% CI, −13.63 to −8.58; P < .001). Notably, differences in AC between weekend and weekdays decreased both during the hard lockdown (β = −6.14; 95% CI, −9.96 to −2.31; P = .002) and in participants with severe AUD (β = −6.26; 95% CI, −10.18 to −2.34; P = .002).
Conclusions and Relevance This 5-month cohort study found no immediate negative associations of lockdown measures with overall AC. Rather, weekend-weekday and holiday AC patterns exceeded lockdown effects. Differences in AC between weekend days and weekdays evinced that weekend drinking cycles decreased as a function of AUD severity and lockdown measures, indicating a potential mechanism of losing and regaining control. This finding suggests that temporal patterns and drinking intention constitute promising targets for prevention and intervention, even in high-risk individuals.
Die staatliche Beschaffungstätigkeit ist korruptionsanfällig. Eine Sonderform der Korruption ist das „Kick-back“. Dabei handelt es sich um eine in den Auftragspreis inkludierte Zuwendung eines Unternehmenshandelnden an einen Bediensteten des vergebenden öffentlichen Auftraggebers für eine Bevorzugung im Vergabeverfahren. Kick-backs schädigen sowohl das staatliche Vermögen als auch den Leistungswettbewerb. Die öffentliche Auftragsvergabe muss daher mit einer wirksamen Prävention durch das Vergaberecht und einer umfassenden Sanktionsandrohung durch das Strafrecht vor Kick-backs geschützt werden. Der Autor untersucht, inwieweit das Vergabe- und das Strafrecht dieser Aufgabe gerecht werden. Er analysiert das Vergaberecht nach Präventions- und Missbrauchspotenzialen sowie die Strafbarkeitsrisiken für an der Vergabe mitwirkende Bedienstete des Auftraggebers. Darauf aufbauend entwickelt er Vorschläge für eine intensivere Bekämpfung von Kick-backs, unter anderem einen Sonderstraftatbestand.