Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (514) (remove)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (395)
- Part of Periodical (53)
- Doctoral Thesis (23)
- Master's Thesis (21)
- Postprint (8)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (5)
- Other (4)
- Bachelor Thesis (2)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
- Lecture (1)
Language
Keywords
- 1799-1804 (45)
- Kosmos (23)
- Lateinamerika (21)
- Relation historique (20)
- BBAW (17)
- Sklaverei (17)
- Vues des Cordilleres (17)
- Berlin (16)
- Briefwechsel (16)
- Carl Friedrich Gauß (16)
Institute
- Institut für Romanistik (514) (remove)
On the 17th of July 1800 Alexander von Humboldt was elected as an extraordinary member of the Prussian Académie royale des sciences et belles-lettres at Berlin. The paper first deals with Humboldt’s scientific activities before his election and then goes into detail as far as his integration into the work of the Academy is concerned. Humboldt was elected as a chimiste célèbre, but as a member of the Academy he did not work as a chemist. When Humboldt proposed in 1837 to classify the members of each class in special fields, he chose for himself the field of "mineralogy-geology".
Alexander von Humboldt has been characterized as the second, scientific discoverer of the New World, as the last universal scientist, Aristotle of modern times, etc. However, more or less hidden in his correspondence we find certain self-characterizations which are not that well-known. Some of them are quoted and discussed in the paper. Thus, an attempt is made to answer the question why Humboldt liked to call himself "the old man from the mountains", and whether or not he found it appropriate to be called "Aristotle of our age."
The present paper investigates the conceptual development of Alexander on Humboldt. The point of reference is his relation to Schelling and to a series of investigators of nature and of physicians closely connected to Naturphilosophie. It is shown that in the correspondence of Humboldt with this group the content underwent a transformation. Scientific exchanges and a general interpretative consensus were over the years more and more replaced by social cooperation over academic appointments, and collaboration over other political problems within the scientific establishment. Humboldt fit Schelling and other partners with whom he cooperated into a network of relationships that rested on mutual social support.
Inhalt:
-Ottmar Ette: Unterwegs zum Weltbewußtsein. Alexander von Humboldts Wissenschaftsverständnis und die Entstehung einer ethisch fundierten Weltanschauung
-Ulrike Leitner: Humboldt’s works on Mexico
-Herbert Pieper: „Ungeheure Tiefe des Denkens, unerreichbarer Scharfblick und die seltenste Schnelligkeit der Kombination“. Zur Wahl Alexander von Humboldts in die Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin vor 200 Jahren
-Ingo Schwarz: „Es ist meine Art, einen und denselben Gegenstand zu verfolgen, bis ich ihn aufgeklärt habe“. Äußerungen Alexander von Humboldts über sich selbst
-Petra Werner: Übereinstimmung oder Gegensatz? Zum widersprüchlichen Verhältnis zwischen A. v. Humboldt und F. W. J. Schelling