Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (216)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (193)
- Postprint (6)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (4)
- Part of a Book (4)
- Other (4)
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
- Part of Periodical (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (216) (remove)
Keywords
- Patholinguistik (39)
- Sprachtherapie (39)
- patholinguistics (39)
- speech/language therapy (32)
- information structure (22)
- Syntax (19)
- syntax (19)
- Festschrift (18)
- Informationsstruktur (18)
- Linguistik (18)
- Morphologie (18)
- festschrift (18)
- linguistics (18)
- morphology (18)
- Cochlea-Implantat (16)
- Dysphagie (16)
- Hören (16)
- Hörstörungen (16)
- Schluckstörung (16)
- Schlucktherapie (16)
- cochlear implant (16)
- dysphagia (16)
- dysphagia therapy (16)
- hearing (16)
- hearing loss (16)
- swallowing disorders (16)
- Bilingualismus (7)
- Mehrsprachigkeit (7)
- Sprachförderung (7)
- bilingualism (7)
- focus (7)
- speech and language therapy (7)
- prosody (5)
- Focus (4)
- Japanese (4)
- givenness (4)
- Optimality Theory (3)
- Prosody (3)
- Topic (3)
- contrastive focus (3)
- Adverbial Quantification (2)
- Information Structure (2)
- Intonation (2)
- Minimalist Program (2)
- Object Shift (2)
- experimental linguistics (2)
- focus ambiguity (2)
- focus asymmetries (2)
- focus intonation (2)
- focus types (2)
- intonation (2)
- morphological focus marking (2)
- scope of focus (2)
- wh-question (2)
- (Statement-Question Matching) (1)
- (implicit) prosody (1)
- A-bar-movement (1)
- Adverbs of Frequency (1)
- Adverbs of Quantity (1)
- Afro-Asiatic (1)
- Agreement (1)
- Alternative Semantics (1)
- Anaphora (1)
- Bias (1)
- Binding Theory (1)
- Candidate Set (1)
- Centering Theory (1)
- Chechen (1)
- Chomskyan linguistics (1)
- Competition (1)
- Complex Speech Acts (1)
- Complexity (1)
- Contrast (1)
- Covert Variables (1)
- Derivation-and-Evaluation model (1)
- Deutschunterricht (1)
- Diskursgegebenheit (1)
- Domain Restriction (1)
- Downstep (1)
- Dysarthrie (1)
- Economy (1)
- Evolution of Language (1)
- F-marking (1)
- Foodo (1)
- Früher Spracherwerb (1)
- G-marking (1)
- Givenness (1)
- Handedness (1)
- Information structure (1)
- Intervention Effect (1)
- Klassifikator (1)
- Konkomba (1)
- Kontext (1)
- Koreferenz (1)
- Lehrmittel (1)
- Levels of adequacy (1)
- Merkmale (1)
- Movement (1)
- Multiple Spell-Out (1)
- Natural Law (1)
- Negative (1)
- OT syntax (1)
- Order preservation (1)
- PSP (1)
- PSP-P (1)
- PSP-RS (1)
- Parallelism Requirement (1)
- Parameters (1)
- Partition (1)
- Perception (1)
- Pitch Reset (1)
- Polar Questions (1)
- Post-Focus Reduction (1)
- Pronomen (1)
- Pronouns (1)
- Prosodie (1)
- Psycholinguistik (1)
- Quantificational Variability (1)
- Recursivity (1)
- Reference Set (1)
- Richardson Syndrom (1)
- Richardson Syndrome (1)
- SDRT (1)
- Second Occurrence Focus (1)
- Sekundarstufe 2 (1)
- Simplicity (1)
- Situations (1)
- Sprachwahrnehmung (1)
- Sprachwandel (1)
- Swiss German (1)
- Tag Questions (1)
- Tense Semantics (1)
- Tone (language) (1)
- Topic/Comment (1)
- Uninterpretablity (1)
- VP-topicalisation (1)
- Vietnamese (1)
- Wh-question (1)
- Whinterrogatives (1)
- Word processing (1)
- adverbial quantification (1)
- affect (1)
- afro-asiatic (1)
- alternative semantics presupposition projection (1)
- anaphora (1)
- applicatives (1)
- argument / adjunct focus (1)
- argument/adjunct focus (1)
- bilingual word processing (1)
- branching (1)
- breadth of focus (1)
- classifier (1)
- cleft (1)
- conjunction (1)
- constraints (1)
- context (1)
- contextual markedness (1)
- contrastive topic (1)
- coreference (1)
- corrective focus (1)
- cyclicity (1)
- dative (1)
- definites (1)
- discourse (1)
- discourse expectability (1)
- discourse structure (1)
- discourse-givenness (1)
- dummy prepositions (1)
- dysarthria (1)
- dysarthric features (1)
- early Germanic (1)
- early indicators for SLI (1)
- economy (1)
- emphasis (1)
- evaluator (1)
- exhaustive identification (1)
- extraposition (1)
- focus anaphoricity (1)
- focus constructions (1)
- focus copula (1)
- focus meaning (1)
- focus movement (1)
- focus type (1)
- foregrounding (1)
- generator (1)
- gesture (1)
- informational focus (1)
- inherent Case (1)
- interface (1)
- intonation (language) (1)
- late talker (1)
- markedness (1)
- mayan (1)
- minimalism (1)
- minimalist program (1)
- narrative structure (1)
- negative polarity item (NPI) (1)
- nepali (1)
- oblique case (1)
- operator movement (1)
- optimality (1)
- optimality theory (1)
- palauan (1)
- phase (1)
- phases (1)
- pitch accent (1)
- polarity focus (1)
- political speech (1)
- predicate focus (1)
- presupposition (1)
- processing (1)
- processing of phonological details (1)
- prosodic phrasing (1)
- prosodic prominence (1)
- psycholinguistics (1)
- reconstruction (1)
- relative clauses (1)
- research programme (1)
- resumption (1)
- second occurrence focus (1)
- situation variables (1)
- split ergative (1)
- spoken discourse (1)
- syntactic focus marking (1)
- syntax-phonology interface (1)
- syntax-phonology mapping (1)
- syntax-semantics interface (1)
- tf-idf (1)
- topic (1)
- topic-comment (1)
- topicalization (1)
- universal quantifiers (1)
- variation (1)
- verb-second (1)
- wh-scope (1)
Institute
- Department Linguistik (216) (remove)
Neologismen
(2009)
Aspect splits can affect agreement, Case, and even preposition insertion. This paper discusses the functional ‘why’ and the theoretical ‘how’ of aspect splits. Aspect splits are an economical way to mark aspect by preserving or suppressing some independent element in one aspect. In formal terms, they are produced in the same way as coda conditions in phonology, with positional/contextual faithfulness.This approach captures the additive effects of cross-cutting splits. Aspect splits are analyzed here from Hindi, Nepali, Yucatec Maya, Chontal, and Palauan.
Inhalt: 1. Einleitung 1.1 Blickbewegungen beim Lesen 1.2 Kognitive Kontrolle und verteilte Verarbeitung 2. Fragestellungen und Hypothesen 3. Methoden 3.1 Probanden 3.2 Material 3.3 Durchführung und Auswertung 4. Ergebnisse 4.1 Unterschiede in Effekten der Wortvorhersagbarkeit 4.2 Unterschiede in Effekten der Wortfrequenz 5. Diskussion 6. Literatur
In this paper I argue that both parametric variation and the alleged differences between languages in terms of their internal complexity straightforwardly follow from the Strongest Minimalist Thesis that takes the Faculty of Language (FL) to be an optimal solution to conditions that neighboring mental modules impose on it. In this paper I argue that hard conditions like legibility at the linguistic interfaces invoke simplicity metrices that, given that they stem from different mental modules, are not harmonious. I argue that widely attested expression strategies, such as agreement or movement, are a direct result of conflicting simplicity metrices, and that UG, perceived as a toolbox that shapes natural language, can be taken to consist of a limited number of markings strategies, all resulting from conflicting simplicity metrices. As such, the contents of UG follow from simplicity requirements, and therefore no longer necessitate linguistic principles, valued or unvalued, to be innately present. Finally, I show that the SMT does not require that languages themselves have to be optimal in connecting sound to meaning.
Contrastive focus
(2007)
The article puts forward a discourse-pragmatic approach to the notoriously evasive phenomena of contrastivity and emphasis. It is argued that occurrences of focus that are treated in terms of ‘contrastive focus’, ‘kontrast’ (Vallduví & Vilkuna 1998) or ‘identificational focus’ (É. Kiss 1998) in the literature should not be analyzed in familiar semantic terms like introduction of alternatives or exhaustivity. Rather, an adequate analysis must take into account discourse-pragmatic notions like hearer expectation or discourse expectability of the focused content in a given discourse situation. The less expected a given content is judged to be for the hearer, relative to the Common Ground, the more likely a speaker is to mark this content by means of special grammatical devices, giving rise to emphasis.
On doubling unconditionals
(2019)
Interdisciplinary studies on information structure : ISIS ; Working papers of the SFB 632. - Vol. 8
(2007)
The 8th volume of the working paper series Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure (ISIS) of the SFB 632 contains a collection of eight papers contributed by guest authors and SFB-members. The first paper on “Biased Questions” is an invited contribution by Nicholas Asher (CNRS, Laboratoire IRIT) & Brian Reese (University of Texas at Austin). Surveying English tag questions, negative polar questions, and what they term “focus” questions, they investigate the effects of prosody on discourse function and discourse structure and analyze the interaction between prosody and discourse in SDRT (Segmented Discourse Representation Theory). Stefan Hinterwimmer (A2) explores the interpretation of singular definites and universally quantified DPs in adverbially quantified English sentences. He suggests that the availability of a co-varying interpretation is more constrained in the case of universally quantified DPs than in the case of singular definites, because different from universally quantified DPs, co-varying definites are inherently focus-marked. The existence of striking similarities between topic/comment structure and bimanual coordination is pointed out and investigated by Manfred Krifka (A2). Showing how principles of bimanual coordination influence the expression of topic/comment structure beyond spoken language, he suggests that bimanual coordination might have been a preadaptation of the development of Information Structure in human communication. Among the different ways of expressing focus in Foodo, an underdescribed African Guang language of the Kwa family, the marked focus constructions are the central topic of the paper by Ines Fiedler (B1 & D2). Exploring the morphosyntactic facilities that Foodo has for focalization, she suggests that the two focus markers N and n have developed out of a homophone conjunction. Focus marking in another scarcely documented African tone language, the Gur language Konkomba, is treated by Anne Schwarz (B1 & D2). Comparing the two alleged focus markers lé and lá of the language, she argues that lé is better interpreted as a syntactic device rather than as a focus marker and shows that this analysis is corroborated by parallels in related languages. The reflexes of Information Structure in four different European languages (French, German, Greek and Hungarian) are compared and validated by Sam Hellmuth & Stavros Skopeteas (D2). The production data was collected with selected materials of the Questionnaire on Information Structure (QUIS) developed at the SFB. The results not only allow for an evaluation of the current elicitation paradigms, but also help to identify potentially fruitful venues of future research. Frank Kügler, Stavros Skopeteas (D2) & Elisabeth Verhoeven (University of Bremen) give an account of the encoding of Information Structure in Yucatec Maya, a Mayan tone language spoken on the Yucatecan peninsula in Mexico. The results of a production experiment lead them to the conclusion that focus is mainly expressed by syntax in this language. Stefanie Jannedy (D3) undertakes an instrumental investigation on the expressions and interpretation of focus in Vietnamese, a language of the Mon-Khmer family contrasting six lexical tones. The data strongly suggests that focus in Vietnamese is exclusively marked by prosody (intonational emphasis expressed via duration, f0 and amplitude) and that different focus conditions can reliably be recovered. This volume offers insights into current work conducted at the SFB 632, comprising empirical and theoretical aspects of Information Structure in a multitude of languages. Several of the papers mine field work data collected during the first phase of the SFB and explore the expression of Information Structure in tone and non-tone languages from various regions of the world.
Interdisciplinary studies on information structure : ISIS ; Working papers of the SFB 632 - Vol. 5
(2006)
In this paper we compare the behaviour of adverbs of frequency (de Swart 1993) like usually with the behaviour of adverbs of quantity like for the most part in sentences that contain plural definites. We show that sentences containing the former type of Q-adverb evidence that Quantificational Variability Effects (Berman 1991) come about as an indirect effect of quantification over situations: in order for quantificational variability readings to arise, these sentences have to obey two newly observed constraints that clearly set them apart from sentences containing corresponding quantificational DPs, and that can plausibly be explained under the assumption that quantification over (the atomic parts of) complex situations is involved. Concerning sentences with the latter type of Q-adverb, on the other hand, such evidence is lacking: with respect to the constraints just mentioned, they behave like sentences that contain corresponding quantificational DPs. We take this as evidence that Q-adverbs like for the most part do not quantify over the atomic parts of sum eventualities in the cases under discussion (as claimed by Nakanishi and Romero (2004)), but rather over the atomic parts of the respective sum individuals.
Interdisciplinary studies on information structure : ISIS ; Working papers of the SFB 632. - Vol. 10
(2008)
The 10th volume of the working paper series contains two papers contributed by SFB-members. The first paper “Single prosodic phrase sentences” by Caroline Féry (A1) and Heiner Drenhaus (C6, University of Potsdam) investigates the prosody of Wide Focus Partial Fronting in a series of production and perception experiments. The second paper “Focus Asymmetries in Bura” by Katharina Hartmann, Peggy Jacob (B2, Humboldt University Berlin) and Malte Zimmermann (A5, University of Potsdam) explores the strategies of marking focus in Bura (Chadic).
This volume contains the proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Prosody, Syntax, and Information Structure (WPSI2), held at University of Potsdam on March 18, 2005. WPSI 2 was aimed to discuss issues on the interaction of prosody, syntax, and information structure, from interdisciplinary points of view. The contributors (Haruo Kubozono, Shinichiro Ishihara, Yoshihisa Kitagawa, and Satoshi Tomioka) have been recently working on relevant issues, especially looking at the phenomena related to the intonation of focus and (wh-)questions in Japanese.