Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (3) (remove)
Year of publication
- 2019 (3) (remove)
Language
- English (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3)
Keywords
Institute
Power-to-gas (PtG) stores chemical energy by converting excess electrical energy from renewable sources into an energy-dense gas. Due to its higher available capacity compared to surface-based storage technologies, subsurface storage in geological systems is the most promising approach for efficient and economic realization of the PtG system’s storage component. For this purpose, methane (CH4) produced by methanation by means of hydrogen (H2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) is stored in a geological reservoir until required for further use. In this context, CO2 is used as the cushion gas to maintain reservoir pressure and limiting working gas, i.e., (CH4) losses during withdrawal periods. Consequently, mixing of both gases in the reservoir is inevitable. Therefore, it is necessary to minimize the gas mixing region to optimize the efficiency of the PtG system’s storage component. In the present study, the physical properties of CH4, CO2 and their mixtures are reviewed. Then, a multicomponent flow model is implemented and validated against published data. Next, a hydromechanically coupled model is established, considering fluid flow through porous media and effective stresses to investigate the mixing behavior of both gases and the mechanical reservoir stability. The simulation results show that, with increasing reservoir thickness and dip angle, the mixing region is reduced during gas injection if CO2 is employed as the cushion gas. In addition, the degree of mixing is lower at higher temperatures. Feasible injection rates and injection schedules can be derived from the integrated reservoir stability analysis. The methodology developed in the present study allows the determination of optimum strategies for storage reservoir selection and gas injection scheduling by minimizing the gas mixing region.
Underground coal gasification (UCG) enables utilization of coal reserves, currently not economically exploitable due to complex geological boundary conditions. Hereby, UCG produces a high-calorific synthesis gas that can be used for generation of electricity, fuels, and chemical feedstock. The present study aims to identify economically-competitive, site-specific end-use options for onshore- and offshore-produced UCG synthesis gas, taking into account the capture and storage (CCS) and/or utilization (CCU) of produced CO2. Modeling results show that boundary conditions favoring electricity, methanol, and ammonia production expose low costs for air separation, low compression power requirements, and appropriate shares of H-2/N-2. Hereby, a gasification agent ratio of more than 30% oxygen by volume is not favorable from the economic and CO2 mitigation viewpoints. Compared to the costs of an offshore platform with its technical equipment, offshore drilling costs are marginal. Thus, uncertainties related to parameters influenced by drilling costs are negligible. In summary, techno-economic process modeling results reveal that air-blown gasification scenarios are the most cost-effective ones, while offshore UCG-CCS/CCU scenarios are up to 1.7 times more expensive than the related onshore processes. Hereby, all investigated onshore scenarios except from ammonia production under the assumed worst-case conditions are competitive on the European market.