Refine
Year of publication
- 2009 (1835) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (1113)
- Doctoral Thesis (247)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (218)
- Postprint (132)
- Review (66)
- Part of Periodical (14)
- Master's Thesis (13)
- Preprint (13)
- Other (7)
- Part of a Book (3)
Language
Keywords
- Deutschland (14)
- Germany (13)
- Hochschuldidaktik (13)
- Informatik (13)
- Ausbildung (12)
- Didaktik (12)
- Comparative Music Education Germany-Spain (11)
- Cultural Diversity (11)
- German Foreign Policy (11)
- Intercultural Music Education (11)
Institute
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (209)
- Institut für Chemie (129)
- Institut für Geowissenschaften (120)
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (115)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (98)
- Historisches Institut (84)
- WeltTrends e.V. Potsdam (84)
- Institut für Romanistik (78)
- Sozialwissenschaften (71)
- Department Psychologie (69)
In this paper I argue that both parametric variation and the alleged differences between languages in terms of their internal complexity straightforwardly follow from the Strongest Minimalist Thesis that takes the Faculty of Language (FL) to be an optimal solution to conditions that neighboring mental modules impose on it. In this paper I argue that hard conditions like legibility at the linguistic interfaces invoke simplicity metrices that, given that they stem from different mental modules, are not harmonious. I argue that widely attested expression strategies, such as agreement or movement, are a direct result of conflicting simplicity metrices, and that UG, perceived as a toolbox that shapes natural language, can be taken to consist of a limited number of markings strategies, all resulting from conflicting simplicity metrices. As such, the contents of UG follow from simplicity requirements, and therefore no longer necessitate linguistic principles, valued or unvalued, to be innately present. Finally, I show that the SMT does not require that languages themselves have to be optimal in connecting sound to meaning.
Inhalt: 1. Einführung 2. Einige Bruchstücke aus den Arbeitsergebnissen zur Forschung DDR-Musikerziehung und zum Musiklernen in der DDR 3. Ausgewählte Diskussionspunkte und Perspektiven im zeitgeschichtlichen Forschungsfeld DDR-Musikerziehung 3.1 Was ist Zeitgeschichte im Kontext musikpädagogischer Forschung? 3.2 Welche motivationalen Zugänge zur Erforschung der DDR-Musikpädagogik lassen sich finden? 3.3 Kann die wissenschaftliche Auseinandersetzung mit der DDR-Musikpädagogik als Modellfall gelten? 3.4 Welcher Sachstand ist zur Erforschung der DDR-Musikpädagogik zu bilanzieren? 3.5 Welche Forschungsdesiderata konnten festgestellt werden?
Are the Germans interested in flamenco nowadays? If so they are, then how can a type of art that is so different from both German cultured and popular music be represented in the culture of that country? Possible answers to this and other questions on the still romantic image of flamenco held in Central Europe will be provided by the analysis of the flamenco being offered at German universities, festivals, private dance schools, publishing houses and websites.
Are the Germans interested in flamenco nowadays? If so they are, then how can a type of art that is so different from both German cultured and popular music be represented in the culture of that country? Possible answers to this and other questions on the still romantic image of flamenco held in Central Europe, will be provided by the analysis of the flamenco being offered at German universities, festivals, private dance schools, publishing houses and websites.
Content: 1. Introduction 2. Music in the curriculum of The Educación Obligatoria 2.1 Music in Educación Primaria - Listening and Comprehension - Music Making - Rational Analysis (Musical Notation) 2.2. Music in Educación Secundaria Obligatoria (E.S.O. Compulsory Secondary education) and Bachillerato (Pre-University Education) 3. Music in the Spanish Non-Compulsory Education 3.1. Elementary and Medium Levels 3.2. The “Title of Higher Music Education” 4. The new certificate of “Didactic Specialization” 5. Concluding remarks