Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (246) (remove)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (246) (remove)
Language
- English (186)
- German (49)
- Multiple languages (10)
- French (1)
Keywords
- Archiv (4)
- Information Structure (4)
- Nachlass (4)
- Cloud Computing (3)
- E-Learning (3)
- middleware (3)
- Constraint Solving (2)
- Deduction (2)
- EMOTIKON (2)
- Forschungsprojekte (2)
Institute
- Extern (137)
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Musterdynamik und Angewandte Fernerkundung (23)
- Institut für Künste und Medien (20)
- Institut für Informatik und Computational Science (15)
- Institut für Slavistik (14)
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (11)
- Institut für Geowissenschaften (10)
- Hasso-Plattner-Institut für Digital Engineering gGmbH (9)
- Sonderforschungsbereich 632 - Informationsstruktur (7)
- Bürgerliches Recht (6)
Vom 03. – 04.10.2003 fand in Oppeln (Opole, Polen) zum ersten Mal eine Konferenz von Polonistik-Studenten aus Deutschland und Polen in polnischer Sprache statt. Die in diesem Band gesammelten Beiträge der Konferenz spiegeln den Stand studentischer Arbeiten auf dem Gebiet der Polonistik wider. Dabei sind v.a. Beiträge aus der Sprachwissenschaft zur polnischen Sprache der Gegenwart, aber auch der Literaturwissenschaft und den deutsch-polnischen Beziehungen enthalten. Schwerpunkt der Konferenz waren interkulturelle Interaktionen.
This paper approaches the debate over the notion of “magic circle” through an exploratory analysis of the unfolding of identities/differences in gameplay through Derrida’s différance. Initially, différance is related to the notion of play and identity/difference in Derrida’s perspective. Next, the notion of magic circle through Derrida’s play is analyzed, emphasizing the dynamics of différance to understand gameplay as process; questioning its boundaries. Finally, the focus shifts toward the implications of the interplay of identities and differences during gameplay.
Being "in the game"
(2008)
When people describe themselves as being “in the game” this is often thought to mean they have a sense of presence, i.e. they feel like they are in the virtual environment (Brown/Cairns 2004). Presence research traditionally focuses on user experiences in virtual reality systems (e.g. head mounted displays, CAVE-like systems). In contrast, the experience of gaming is very different. Gamers willingly submit to the rules of the game, learn arbitrary relationships between the controls and the screen output, and take on the persona of their game character. Also whereas presence in VR systems is immediate, presence in gaming is gradual. Due to these differences, one can question the extent to which people feel present during gaming. A qualitative study was conducted to explore what gamers actually mean when they describe themselves as being “in the game.” Thirteen gamers were interviewed and the resulting grounded theory suggests being “in the game” does not necessarily mean presence (i.e. feeling like you are the character and present in the VE). Some people use this phrase just to emphasize their high involvement in the game. These findings differ with Brown and Cairns as they suggest at the highest state of immersion not everybody experiences presence. Furthermore, the experience of presence does not appear dependent on the game being in the first person perspective or the gamer being able to empathize with the character. Future research should investigate why some people experience presence and others do not. Possible explanations include: use of language, perception of presence, personality traits, and types of immersion.
MMORPGs such as WORLD OF WARCRAFT can be understood as interactive representations of war. Within the frame provided by the program the players experience martial conflicts and thus a “virtual war.” The game world however requires a technical and as far as possible invisible infrastructure which has to be protected against attacks: Infrastructure means e.g. the servers on which the data of the player characters and the game’s world are saved, as well as the user accounts, which have to be protected, among other things, from “identity theft.” Besides the war on the virtual surface of the program we will therefore describe the invisible war concerning the infrastructure, the outbreak of which is always feared by the developers and operators of online-worlds, requiring them to take precautions. Furthermore we would like to focus on “virtual game worlds” as places of complete surveillance. Since action in these worlds is always associated with the production of data, total observation is theoretically possible and put into practice by the so-called “game master.” The observation of different communication channels (including user forums) serves to monitor and direct the actions on the virtual battlefield subtly, without the player feeling that his freedom is being limited. Finally, we will compare the fictional theater of war in WORLD OF WARCRAFT to the vision of “Network-Centric Warfare,” since it has often been observed that the analysis of MMORPGs is useful to the real trade of war. However, we point out what an unrealistic theater of war WORLD OF WARCRAFT really is.