Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (604) (remove)
Language
- English (604) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (604) (remove)
Keywords
- Curriculum Framework (31)
- European values education (31)
- Europäische Werteerziehung (31)
- Familie (31)
- Family (31)
- Lehrevaluation (31)
- Studierendenaustausch (31)
- Unterrichtseinheiten (31)
- curriculum framework (31)
- lesson evaluation (31)
Institute
- Vereinigung für Jüdische Studien e. V. (92)
- Extern (78)
- Department Linguistik (75)
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (73)
- Hasso-Plattner-Institut für Digital Engineering GmbH (55)
- Historisches Institut (38)
- Institut für Informatik und Computational Science (37)
- Institut für Umweltwissenschaften und Geographie (35)
- Institut für Jüdische Studien und Religionswissenschaft (34)
- Institut für Romanistik (31)
Focus and Tone
(2007)
Tone is a distinctive feature of the lexemes in tone languages. The information-structural category focus is usually marked by syntactic and morphological means in these languages, but sometimes also by intonation strategies. In intonation languages, focus is marked by pitch movements, which are also perceived as tone. The present article discusses prosodic focus marking in these two language types.
Three dimensions can be distinguished in a cross-linguistic account of information structure. First, there is the definition of the focus constituent, the part of the linguistic expression which is subject to some focus meaning. Second and third, there are the focus meanings and the array of structural devices that encode them. In a given language, the expression of focus is facilitated as well as constrained by the grammar within which the focus devices operate. The prevalence of focus ambiguity, the structural inability to make focus distinctions, will thus vary across languages, and within a language, across focus meanings.
Contrastive focus
(2007)
The article puts forward a discourse-pragmatic approach to the notoriously evasive phenomena of contrastivity and emphasis. It is argued that occurrences of focus that are treated in terms of ‘contrastive focus’, ‘kontrast’ (Vallduví & Vilkuna 1998) or ‘identificational focus’ (É. Kiss 1998) in the literature should not be analyzed in familiar semantic terms like introduction of alternatives or exhaustivity. Rather, an adequate analysis must take into account discourse-pragmatic notions like hearer expectation or discourse expectability of the focused content in a given discourse situation. The less expected a given content is judged to be for the hearer, relative to the Common Ground, the more likely a speaker is to mark this content by means of special grammatical devices, giving rise to emphasis.
Focus presuppositions
(2007)
This paper reviews notions related to focus and presupposition and addresses the hypothesis that focus triggers an existential presupposition. Presupposition projection behavior in certain examples appears to favor a presuppositional analysis of focus. It is argued that these examples are open to a different analysis using givenness theory. Overall, the analysis favors a weak semantics for focus not including an existential presupposition.