Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (332) (remove)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (332) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (332)
Keywords
- social media (5)
- COVID-19 (3)
- E-Mail Tracking (3)
- ERP (3)
- Privacy (3)
- conversational agents (3)
- enterprise systems (3)
- knowledge management (3)
- knowledge transfer (3)
- privacy (3)
Institute
- Fachgruppe Betriebswirtschaftslehre (77)
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (53)
- Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften (41)
- Institut für Ernährungswissenschaft (38)
- Department Psychologie (29)
- Institut für Chemie (15)
- Historisches Institut (7)
- Institut für Mathematik (7)
- Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät (7)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (7)
Mobile Endgeräte und die dazugehörigen Applikationen sind zu einem unverzichtbaren Bestandteil des täglichen Lebens geworden und ermöglichen den ortsund zeitunabhängigen Zugriff auf wichtige Informationen. Hochschulspezifische An- gebote sind im mobilen Bereich hingegen noch immer nicht flächendeckend anzutreffen und lassen sich i. d. R. nur auf Einzelaktivitäten Studierender und Lehrender zurückführen. Dabei können mobile Applikationen einen essentiellen Beitrag zur Verbesserung der studentischen Selbstorganisation sowie für die Ausgestaltung und Ergänzung von konkreten Lehr-/Lernszenarien leisten. Dieser Artikel stellt ein modulares Hochschul-App-Framework vor, das sowohl zentrale campusbezogene Dienste als auch dezentrale Lernapplikationen unter einer Oberfläche vereint anbietet. Anhand einer Analyse von Stärken und Schwächen werden verschiedene Ansätze in Hinblick auf Anforderungen, Entwicklung, Wartung und Betrieb der Hochschul-App zusammengefasst und bewertet. Es wird auf die zugrundeliegende serviceorientierte Architektur eingegangen, die eine Portierung der Applikation auf andere Hochschulen mit einem vertretbaren Aufwand ermöglicht. Der Beitrag schließt mit einer Darstellung der ersten Ergebnisse und weiterführender Überlegungen und Arbeiten.
The term Personal Learning Environment (PLE) is associated with the desire to put the learner in control of his own learning process, so that he is able to set and accomplish the desired learning goals at the right time with the learning environment chosen by him. Gradually, such a learning environment includes several digital content, services and tools. It is thus summarized as the Virtual Learning Environment (VLE). Even though the construction of an individual PLE is a complex task, several approaches to support this process already exist. They mostly occur under the umbrella term PLE or with little accentuations like iPLE, which especially live within the context of institutions. This paper sums up the variety of attempts and technical approaches to establish a PLE and suggests a categorization for them.
Like versus dislike
(2012)
As Facebook's Like-button has become ubiquitous, it is the purpose of this research to investigate (1) whether Likes serve as a signal of a product's or service's quality and (2) how the introduction of a Dislike-button would alter perceptions. Following a qualitative study, we conducted an experiment in which 653 participants were presented with website screenshots featuring varying levels of Likes and Dislikes. The results indicate that the theoretical framing of Likes as a Signal is valid and that people do perceive the quality of products and services as superior when they are associated with more Likes. Signaling also explains the counter-intuitive finding that Dislikes can have a positive effect on people's quality perceptions. Results are discussed with respect to theory and practical implications.
Defining the allocation of decision rights for enterprise applications is a crucial issue in IT governance and organization design. Today, emerging delivery models such as Software as a Service (SaaS) defy the notion of the internal IT department as the focal point of centralized governance. Recognizing the importance of this issue, we find that the phenomenon of 'SaaS governance' itself is not yet well understood. Based on two cases of SaaS adoption, we take a process-theoretic approach to investigate the complex interaction between factors that influence in the allocation of SaaS authority. The results suggest that some factors, such as the locus of initiative and the decision for SaaS, interact with absorptive capacities and determine the later mode of application governance at a very early stage. Thus, the initiative for introducing SaaS emerges as an important intermediate variable between the overall IT governance mode and the resulting SaaS governance outcome.