Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (13273) (remove)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (3990)
- Postprint (3294)
- Doctoral Thesis (2517)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (967)
- Review (558)
- Part of Periodical (463)
- Preprint (446)
- Master's Thesis (264)
- Conference Proceeding (245)
- Working Paper (244)
Language
- German (7005)
- English (5968)
- Spanish (80)
- French (75)
- Multiple languages (62)
- Russian (62)
- Hebrew (9)
- Italian (6)
- Portuguese (2)
- Hungarian (1)
Keywords
- Germany (118)
- Deutschland (106)
- climate change (79)
- Sprachtherapie (77)
- Patholinguistik (73)
- patholinguistics (73)
- Nachhaltigkeit (61)
- European Union (59)
- Europäische Union (58)
- Klimawandel (58)
Institute
- Extern (1370)
- MenschenRechtsZentrum (943)
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (713)
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (707)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (583)
- Institut für Chemie (553)
- Institut für Mathematik (519)
- Institut für Romanistik (509)
- Institut für Geowissenschaften (508)
- Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät (489)
Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on e-learning and Virtual and Remote Laboratories
(2008)
Content Session 1: Architecture of Virtual & Remote Laboratory Infrastructures (I) An Internet-Based Laboratory Course in Chemical Reaction Engineering and Unit Operations Internet Based Laboratory for Experimentation with Multilevel Medium-Power Converters Session 2: Architecture of Virtual & Remote Laboratory Infrastructures (II) Content management and architectural issues of a remote learning laboratory Distributed Software Architecture and Applications for Remote Laboratories Tele-Lab IT-Security: an architecture for an online virtual IT security lab Session 3: New e-learning Techniques for Virtual & Remote Laboratories NeOS: Neuchˆatel Online System A Flexible Instructional Electronics Laboratory with Local and Remote LabWorkbenches in a Grid Simulation of an Intelligent Network - Basic Call State Model Remote Laboratory Session 4: Service-Orientation in Virtual & Remote Laboratories SOA Meets Robots - A Service-Based Software Infrastructure For Remote Laboratories Service Orientation in Education - Intelligent Networks for eLearning / mLearning
Glaubwürdigkeitsbeurteilung bei Vergewaltigungsanzeigen : ein aussagenanalytisches Feldexperiment
(1992)
Die Studie untersucht die Frage, ob sich anhand eines bereits bei kindlichen Zeugenaussagen bewährten Katalogs von Glaubhaftigkeitskriterien zwischen wahren und falschen Vergewaltigungsanzeigen unterscheiden läßt. Das Fallmaterial bestand aus dreißig authentischen Vernehmungsprotokollen, von denen je die Hälfte eingestandene Falschaussagen bzw. anhand von Tätergeständnissen oder Indizien als wahr klassifizierte Aussagen waren. Erfahrene Polizeibeamte aus dem Bereich Sexualstraftaten (N = 30) beurteilten diese Fälle anhand des Kriterienkatalogs von Steiler und Köhnken (1989) und gaben ein abschließendes Urteil über die Glaubwürdigkeit jedes Falles ab. Eine zweite Gruppe von Polizeibeamten (N=22) beurteilte die Fälle ohne Rückgriff auf Realkennzeichen als wahr bzw, falsch. Die diskriminanzanalytische Auswertung der Ergebnisse zeigt, daß der Kriterienkatalog insgesamt gut dazu geeignet ist, zwischen wahren und falschen Vergewaltigungsanzeigen zu differenzieren. Die Ergebnisse der schrittweisen Diskriminanzanalyse zeigen darüber hinaus, welche Glaubhaftigkeitskriterien im einzelnen einen signifikanten Beitrag zur Trennung zwischen Wahr- und Falschaussagen leisten. Der höhere Prozentsatz korrekter Klassifikationen in der Gruppe, die die Realkennzeichen verwendete, erreichte allerdings nur knapp statistische Signifikanz. Insgesamt stützt die vorliegende Studie die Grundannahme der Aussagenanalyse, daß die Analyse der sprachlichen Merkmale einer Aussage einen wesentlichen Beitrag zur Beurteilung des Wahrheitsgehalts einer Anzeige leisten kann.
Personality and language
(1992)
Content Social stereotypes and responsibility attributions to victims of rape Atributing responsibillty to rape victims: a German study Rape myth acceptance and responsibility judgments: a British study Police officers' definitions of rape A study on cognitive prototypes of rape Conclusion References
The study investigates police officers' definitions of different rape situations. On the basis of the concept of 'cognitive prototypes' a methodology is developed which elicits consensual feature lists describing six rape situations: the typical, i.e. most common rape, the credible, dubious, and false rape complaints as weil as the rape experiences that are particularly hard vs. relatively easy for the victim to cope with. Qualitative analysis of the data allows the identification of the characteristic features defining the prototype of each rape situation, as weil as comparisons between the situations in terms of their common and distinctive features. It is shown that police officers, while sharing some of the widely held stereotypes about rape, generally perceive rape as a serious crime with long-term negative consequences for the victim. The quantitative analysis of prototype similarity between the six situations corroborates this conclusion by demonstrating a high similarity between the prototypes of the typical and the credible rape situation: In addition, subjects' general attitude towards rape victims is measured to compare the prototypes provided by respondents holding a positive vs. negative attitude towards rape victims. Findings for the two groups, however, reveal more similarities than differences in their descriptions of rape prototypes. The paper concludes with a discussion of the feasibility of the prototype approach presented in this study as a strategy for investigating implicit or common-sense theories of rape.
The chapter presents a social psychological approach to the study of rape and sexual assault. Two issues are at the core of this approach: identifying the critical variables that affect attributions of responsibility to victims of rape. and exploring people's subjective definitions of rape, which may differ markedly from legal definitions. Following a review of the American evidence, a series of studies conductcd in two European countries is presented to address these issues.
The main points raised by Borkenau against our challenge of the 'intuitive psychometrics' view of personality judgements are discussed, in particular his example of the link between school grades and intelligence. It is argued that the semantic similarity interpretation advanced in our paper is more adequate and more parsimonious than explanations in terms of psychometric reasoning.
Explaining perceived cross-situational consistency : intuitive psychometrics or semantic mediation?
(1988)
Recent studies at the interface of social cognition and personality theory have stressed lay persons' ability to 'function as intuitive psychometricians' (Epstein and Teraspulsky, 1986). This research argues that lay persons not only show a substantial degree of accuracy in estimating cross-situational generality of behaviour, but also take into account principles of aggregation over time. In contrast, it is argued here that lay persons' perceptions of the degree of relatedness of different behaviours are mediated largely by the decontextualized semantic relationships between behavioural descriptions. This argument finds support in two experimental studies which demonstrate that the main source for subjects' judgments of 'cross-situational consistency' can be found in an abstracted knowledge base which is represented and mediated through language. The implications of the findings are drawn out for personality research. in particular with reference to domain and item selection in questionnaires for research.
Two field studies were conducted lo investigate the influence of observer and victim characteristics on attributions of victim and assailant responsibility in a rape case. In the first study, male and female subjects completed a measure of rape myth acceptance and were presented with a rape account after which they were asked to attribute responsibility to victim and assailant. In the second study, a new sample was asked to attribute responsibility to victim and assailant on the basis of one of two rape accounts in which victim's pre-rape behavior was manipulated. Results showed that both rape myth acceptance and victims' pre-rape behavior in influenced the degree of responsibility attributed to victims and assailants. No significant effects of subject gender were found. A more complex conceptualization is suggested of the link between observer and victim characteristics in social reactions to and evaluations of rape victims.