Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (3) (remove)
Document Type
- Master's Thesis (3) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3)
Keywords
- Partizipation (3) (remove)
Institute
- Sozialwissenschaften (3) (remove)
This diploma thesis deals with the process of political and administrative decentralisation in the Kingdom of Lesotho. Although decentralization in itself does not automatically lead to development it became an integral part of reform processes in many developing countries. Governments and international donors consider efficient decentralized political and administrative structures as essential elements of “good governance” and a prerequisite for structural poverty alleviation. This paper seeks to analyse how the given decentralization strategy and its implementation is affecting different features of good governance in the case of Lesotho. The results of the analysis confirm that the decentralisation process significantly improved political participation of the local population. However, the second objective of enhancing efficiency through decentralisation was not achieved. To the contrary, in the institutional design of the newly created local authorities and in the civil service recruitment policy efficiency considerations did not matter. Additionally, the created mechanisms for political participation generate relevant costs. Thus it is impossible to judge unambiguously on the contribution of decentralisation to the achievement of good governance. Different subtargets of good governance are influenced contrarily. Consequently, the adequacy of the concept of good governance as a guiding concept for decentralisation policies can be questioned. The assessment of the success of decentralisation policies requires a normative framework that takes into account the relations between both participation and efficiency. Despite the partly reduced administrative efficiency the author’s overall impression of the decentralisation process in Lesotho is positive. The establishment of democratically legitimised and participatory local governments justifies certain additional expenditure. However, mistakes in the design and the implementation of the decentralisation strategy would have been avoidable.
Die Stadtwerkebetriebe, zumindest diejenigen die im Strom- und Gassektor tätig sind, sind meist nicht mehr im Stadtwerke Eigenbetrieb organisiert, sondern von den Kommunen in den vergangenen zwei Jahrzehnten in die Privatrechtsform der GmbH ausgegliedert worden. Hinzu kommt, dass diese kommunalen Unternehmen in einem Energiebinnenmarkt agieren, der durch die EU-Marktliberalisierung entstanden ist. Die unternehmerische Verselbstständigung der Stadtwerke GmbH von politischer Steuerung wird durch das Credo des Neuen Steuerungsmodells bestärkt, das gerade in der unternehmerischen Unabhängigkeit die Voraussetzungen für wirtschaftlichen Erfolg sieht. Diese Rahmenbedingungen zwingen die Unternehmen der kommunalen Wirtschaft, sich ausschließlich nach unternehmerischen und marktinduzierten Systemen zu richten. Dass die Logik des unternehmerischen Handelns keinen Platz lässt für eine politische Steuerung der Unternehmen, wird zum Legitimationsproblem für die kommunale Wirtschaft. Denn eine ausschließliche Orientierung an den Überschüssen der kommunalen Unternehmen legitimiert nicht den öffentlichen Zweck, weder politisch noch organisationsrechtlich. Die Gemeinwohlorientierung ist konstitutiver Bestandteil der kommunalen wirtschaftlichen Betätigung. Hier wird die These hervorgebracht, dass Bürgerbeteiligung in dieser Situation von den Stadtwerken zugelassen wird, um dieses Legitimationsdefizit abzuschwächen. Zwei Fälle werden qualitativ analysiert und verglichen: erstens die Stadtwerke Wolfhagen GmbH, die anhand von Bürgerbeteiligung Akzeptanz für einen Windpark generieren wollen. Zweitens die Stadtwerke Potsdam GmbH, die aus einer - hier als PR-Krise beschriebenen - Situation heraus, Legitimation mit verschiedenen Instrumenten der Bürgerbeteiligung wiederherzustellen versuchen.
The present work is a case study contributing to the major planning project “Suedlink”. It is structured as follows: first, in a theoretical part, mandatory theories of social acceptance (Wüstenhagen et al., 2007), steps of participation (Münnich, 2014), and the governance theory (Benz and Dose, 2011) are elaborated. Secondly, the relevant methods are discussed. Thirdly, in a qualitative analytical part, the information that were gathered from the expert interviews are analyzed with the use of the aforementioned theories. In the fourth place, an empirical quantitative analysis of data regarding the public acceptance towards Suedlink is presented.
In this case study, with the use of qualitative and quantitative methods, two questions are answered: first, which governance aspects were relevant for the priority use of underground cables for the construction of high voltage direct current transmission lines? For this question, intensive document analysis and different expert interviews were conducted. Secondly, the central question of the present work addresses the question whether local or/and individual factors affect the public acceptance towards SüdLink. Here, in particular, it is interesting to analyze if the priority use of underground cables affected the people’s acceptance towards SuedLink. In order to respond to both questions, an online survey was conducted among citizen initiatives, district administrators, and individuals in social media during March till July 2016. Thereafter, the data was analyzed with the use of descriptive quantitative methods. The data shows, that underground cables not necessarily increase public acceptance (see also Menges and Beyer, 2013). On the contrary, individual and local criteria were relevant for the survey respondents. For example criteria such as the quality of participation, distance between home and transmission lines, and the additional financial burden (taxes, higher prices for electricity) were important for the evaluation. In addition, survey respondents who participated in citizen initiatives were more critical against the priority use of underground cables and SuedLink in general. Likewise, residential homeowners rejected every form of transmission lines.