Refine
Year of publication
- 2012 (86) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (60)
- Conference Proceeding (14)
- Doctoral Thesis (6)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (2)
- Review (2)
- Other (1)
- Preprint (1)
Language
- English (75)
- German (9)
- French (1)
- Multiple languages (1)
Keywords
- Eye movements (5)
- Embodied cognition (4)
- Interoception (3)
- Reading (3)
- Alexithymia (2)
- Blickbewegungen (2)
- Chinese (2)
- Computationale Modellierung (2)
- EEG (2)
- Embodiment (2)
Institute
- Department Psychologie (86) (remove)
During reading, saccadic eye movements are generated to shift words into the center of the visual field for lexical processing. Recently, Krugel and Engbert (Vision Research 50:1532-1539, 2010) demonstrated that within-word fixation positions are largely shifted to the left after skipped words. However, explanations of the origin of this effect cannot be drawn from normal reading data alone. Here we show that the large effect of skipped words on the distribution of within-word fixation positions is primarily based on rather subtle differences in the low-level visual information acquired before saccades. Using arrangements of "x" letter strings, we reproduced the effect of skipped character strings in a highly controlled single-saccade task. Our results demonstrate that the effect of skipped words in reading is the signature of a general visuomotor phenomenon. Moreover, our findings extend beyond the scope of the widely accepted range-error model, which posits that within-word fixation positions in reading depend solely on the distances of target words. We expect that our results will provide critical boundary conditions for the development of visuomotor models of saccade planning during reading.
Erste Bindung (12-13 Monate)
(2012)
Depression
(2012)
Parameters of a formal working-memory model were estimated for verbal and spatial memory updating of children. The model proposes interference though feature overwriting and through confusion of whole elements as the primary cause of working-memory capacity limits. We tested 2 age groups each containing 1 group of normal intelligence and 1 deficit group. For young children the deficit was developmental dyslexia; for older children it was a general learning difficulty. The interference model predicts less interference through overwriting but more through confusion of whole elements for the dyslexic children than for their age-matched controls. Older children exhibited less interference through confusion of whole elements and a higher processing rate than young children, but general learning difficulty was associated with slower processing than in the age-matched control group. Furthermore, the difference between verbal and spatial updating mapped onto several meaningful dissociations of model parameters.