Refine
Year of publication
- 2014 (25) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (22)
- Postprint (2)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (1)
Keywords
- prevention (25) (remove)
Two of a kind?
(2014)
School attacks are attracting increasing attention in aggression research. Recent systematic analyses provided new insights into offense and offender characteristics. Less is known about attacks in institutes of higher education (e.g., universities). It is therefore questionable whether the term “school attack” should be limited to institutions of general education or could be extended to institutions of higher education. Scientific literature is divided in distinguishing or unifying these two groups and reports similarities as well as differences. We researched 232 school attacks and 45 attacks in institutes of higher education throughout the world and conducted systematic comparisons between the two groups. The analyses yielded differences in offender (e.g., age, migration background) and offense characteristics (e.g., weapons, suicide rates), and some similarities (e.g., gender). Most differences can apparently be accounted for by offenders’ age and situational influences. We discuss the implications of our findings for future research and the development of preventative measures.
Leaking comprises observable behavior or statements that signal intentions of committing a violent offense and is considered an important warning sign for school shootings. School staff who are confronted with leaking have to assess its seriousness and react appropriately - a difficult task, because knowledge about leaking is sparse. The present study, therefore, examined how frequently leaking occurs in schools and how teachers identify leaking and respond to it. To achieve this aim, we informed teachers from eight schools in Germany about the definition of leaking and other warning signs and risk factors for school shootings in a one-hour information session. Teachers were then asked to report cases of leaking over a six- to nine-month period and to answer a questionnaire on leaking and its treatment after the information session and six to nine months later. Our results suggest that leaking is a relevant problem in German schools. Teachers mostly rated the information session positively and benefited in several aspects (e.g. reported more perceived courses of action or improved knowledge about leaking), but also expressed a constant need for support. Our findings highlight teachers' needs for further support and training and may be used in the planning of prevention measures for school shootings.
Leaking comprises observable behavior or statements that signal intentions of committing a violent offense and is considered an important warning sign for school shootings. School staff who are confronted with leaking have to assess its seriousness and react appropriately - a difficult task, because knowledge about leaking is sparse. The present study, therefore, examined how frequently leaking occurs in schools and how teachers identify leaking and respond to it. To achieve this aim, we informed teachers from eight schools in Germany about the definition of leaking and other warning signs and risk factors for school shootings in a one-hour information session. Teachers were then asked to report cases of leaking over a six- to nine-month period and to answer a questionnaire on leaking and its treatment after the information session and six to nine months later. Our results suggest that leaking is a relevant problem in German schools. Teachers mostly rated the information session positively and benefited in several aspects (e.g. reported more perceived courses of action or improved knowledge about leaking), but also expressed a constant need for support. Our findings highlight teachers' needs for further support and training and may be used in the planning of prevention measures for school shootings.
1. Einleitung
2. Herausforderungen der (Gewalt-)Prävention
2.1 Prävention im kommunalen Raum
2.2 Herausforderung Vielfalt
3. Gewalt
3.1 Möglichkeiten einer Definition
3.2 Über Ursachen
4. Das Konzept Mea
4.1 Nutzung bereits evaluierter Programme
4.2 Organisationsentwicklung
5. Entwicklung von Präventionslandschaften
5.1 Von der Hierarchie zur Netzwerkarbeit
5.2 Räume einer gelingenden Sozialisation
5.2.1 Sozialräume
5.2.2 Soziale Netzwerke
6. Schlussbemerkungen
Literatur
Präventiver Kinderschutz
(2014)
Die "Grüne Liste Prävention"
(2014)
1. Notwendigkeit nachhaltiger Kriminalprävention
2. Das 1. Jugendgerichtsgesetz (JGGÄndG) 1990
3. Das 2. JGGÄndG 2008
4. Nationale Entwicklungen
5. Internationale Entwicklungen
5.1 Prävention in Europa
5.2 Jugendkriminalprävention im europäischen Vergleich
5.2.1 European Crime Prevention Network (EUCPN)
5.2.2 WHO-Bericht zur Jugendgewaltprävention in Europa (2010)
5.3 Jugendkriminalprävention USA
5.4 Reformbestrebungen, Präventionskoordination und -initiativen in den USA
6. Implementationswissenschaft: Effekte durch Einführung nachgewiesen wirksamer Programme
7. Ausblick
Literatur
1. Einleitung: … Prozesse nachhaltig gestalten?
2. Konzeptioneller Ansatz: Positive Entwicklung junger Menschen fördern
3. Impulse des DFK zur Weiterentwicklung der Gewaltprävention in Deutschland im Zeitraum 2001 bis 2011
3.1 Projekt „Primäre Prävention von Gewalt gegen Gruppenangehörige“ (2001–2006)
3.2 Unterrichtung der Ministerpräsidentenkonferenz über den Stand der Gewaltprävention sowie über zentrale Handlungserfordernisse zu ihrer nachhaltigen Gestaltung (2003–2006)
3.3 Bericht des Deutschen Jugendinstituts (DJI): Strategien der Gewaltprävention im Kindes und Jugendalter – Eine Zwischenbilanz in sechs Handlungsfeldern (2007)
3.4 Expertise „Gelingensbedingungen für die Prävention von interpersonaler Gewalt im Kindes- und Jugendalter“ (2008)
3.5 Förderung der Evaluation gewaltpräventiver Programme (seit 2009)
3.6 Kooperationsprojekt von Deutscher Bahn AG (DB), DFK und FU Berlin zur Verbreitung entwicklungsorientierter Programme (seit 2010)
3.7 Wissensmanagement zu Entwicklungsförderung und Gewaltprävention (seit 2008)
4. DFK-Projekt „Entwicklungsförderung und Gewaltprävention für jungen Menschen (E & G)“ (seit 2011)
4.1 DFK Sachverständigenrat und Leitfaden „Entwicklungsförderung und Gewaltprävention für junge Menschen“ (2012/2013)
4.2 Weitführenden Perspektiven: Memorandum „Qualität, Struktur und Kooperation fördern“ (2013)
4.3 Projektfortsetzung und Webportal „wegweiser prävention“ (2014)
5. Fazit: … und am Ende nachhaltige Prozesse?
Literatur