Refine
Year of publication
- 2024 (1)
- 2023 (2)
- 2022 (10)
- 2021 (7)
- 2020 (3)
- 2019 (6)
- 2018 (3)
- 2017 (4)
- 2016 (6)
- 2015 (7)
- 2014 (2)
- 2013 (4)
- 2012 (6)
- 2011 (7)
- 2010 (6)
- 2009 (8)
- 2008 (7)
- 2007 (7)
- 2006 (5)
- 2005 (5)
- 2004 (5)
- 2003 (11)
- 2002 (3)
- 2001 (6)
- 2000 (4)
- 1999 (6)
- 1998 (2)
- 1997 (2)
- 1996 (7)
- 1995 (2)
- 1994 (7)
- 1992 (2)
- 1989 (1)
- 1988 (1)
- 1987 (1)
- 1985 (1)
Document Type
- Article (105)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (18)
- Review (13)
- Postprint (12)
- Doctoral Thesis (7)
- Conference Proceeding (4)
- Other (4)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Part of Periodical (1)
- Preprint (1)
Language
- English (167) (remove)
Keywords
- bilingualism (4)
- Mehrsprachigkeit (3)
- Turkish (3)
- Türkisch (3)
- Balkan Turkic (2)
- Deutsch (2)
- ERP (2)
- German (2)
- Infinitival patterns (2)
- Kiezdeutsch (2)
Institute
- Institut für Germanistik (167) (remove)
According to Haider (2010), we have to distinguish three types of infinitival complements in Present-Day German: (i) CP complements, (ii) VP complements and (iii) verbal clusters. While CP complements give rise to biclausal structures, VP complements and verbal clusters indicate a monoclausal structure. Non-finite verbs in verbal clusters build a syntactic unit with the governing verb. It is only the last infinitival pattern that we address as a so-called coherent infinitival pattern, a notion introduced in the influential work of Bech (1955/57). Verbal clusters are bound to languages with an OV grammar, hence the well-known differences regarding infinitival syntax in German and English (Haider 2003, Bobaljik 2004). On the widespread assumption that German has been an OV language throughout its history (Axel 2007), we expect all three types of infinitival complements to be present from the earliest attestions of German.
The administrative language used in imperial and city chanceries illustrates formal language use in the Early Modern period, as most evident in its syntactic complexity. Since administrative language was considered prestigious by the literate people of the time, the syntactic features in question are increasingly found in other text types as well (Lötscher 1995, Schwitalla 2002). The present paper investigates early newspapers published in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries to evalute their degree of syntactic complexity and hence the extent of formal language used. Contrary to common belief (Admoni 1980, von Polenz 2013), it will be shown that early newspapers do not allow a uniform assessment in terms of their syntactic complexity, when they emerge as a new genre in the seventeenth century: some news segments display a fairly simple syntax, whereas others are of high syntactic complexity. By the end of the eighteenth century, the growing conventionalization of the new genre as well as the impact of standardization processes render newspapers much more balanced in terms of syntactic complexity. Unlike previous work on the syntactic complexity of newspaper language, the measurement of syntactic complexity takes into account not only sentence length and the relationship between independent and dependent clauses, but also the placement of adverbial clauses in relation to their associated clause.