Refine
Year of publication
- 2021 (203) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (134)
- Doctoral Thesis (32)
- Postprint (24)
- Part of Periodical (7)
- Conference Proceeding (6)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (203)
Keywords
- Arabidopsis thaliana (9)
- evolution (5)
- mechanobiology (5)
- starch metabolism (5)
- Bombina bombina (4)
- LCSM (4)
- Microcystis (4)
- conservation (4)
- dispersal (4)
- microplastics (4)
Institute
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (203) (remove)
Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) nanostructures enable the attachment of functional molecules to nearly any unique location on their underlying structure. Due to their single-base-pair structural resolution, several ligands can be spatially arranged and closely controlled according to the geometry of their desired target, resulting in optimized binding and/or signaling interactions.
This dissertation covers three main projects. All of them use variations of functionalized DNA nanostructures that act as platform for oligovalent presentation of ligands. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the ability of DNA nanostructures to precisely display different types of functional molecules and to consequently enhance their efficacy according to the concept of multivalency. Moreover, functionalized DNA structures were examined for their suitability in functional screening assays. The developed DNA-based compound ligands were used to target structures in different biological systems.
One part of this dissertation attempted to bind pathogens with small modified DNA nanostructures. Pathogens like viruses and bacteria are known for their multivalent attachment to host cells membranes. By blocking their receptors for recognition and/or fusion with their targeted host in an oligovalent manner, the objective was to impede their ability to adhere to and invade cells. For influenza A, only enhanced binding of oligovalent peptide-DNA constructs compared to the monovalent peptide could be observed, whereas in the case of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), binding as well as blocking of the target receptors led to an increased inhibition of infection in vitro.
In the final part, the ability of chimeric DNA-peptide constructs to bind to and activate signaling receptors on the surface of cells was investigated. Specific binding of DNA trimers, conjugated with up to three peptides, to EphA2 receptor expressing cells was evaluated in flow cytometry experiments. Subsequently, their ability to activate these receptors via phosphorylation was assessed. EphA2 phosphorylation was significantly increased by DNA trimers carrying three peptides compared to monovalent peptide. As a result of activation, cells underwent characteristic morphological changes, where they "round up" and retract their periphery.
The results obtained in this work comprehensively prove the capability of DNA nanostructures to serve as stable, biocompatible, controllable platforms for the oligovalent presentation of functional ligands. Functionalized DNA nanostructures were used to enhance biological effects and as tool for functional screening of bio-activity. This work demonstrates that modified DNA structures have the potential to improve drug development and to unravel the activation of signaling pathways.
There is a general consensus that diverse ecological communities are better equipped to adapt to changes in their environment, but our understanding of the mechanisms by which they do so remains incomplete. Accurately predicting how the global biodiversity crisis affects the functioning of ecosystems, and the services they provide, requires extensive knowledge about these mechanisms.
Mathematical models of food webs have been successful in uncovering many aspects of the link between diversity and ecosystem functioning in small food web modules, containing at most two adaptive trophic levels. Meaningful extrapolation of this understanding to the functioning of natural food webs remains difficult, due to the presence of complex interactions that are not always accurately captured by bitrophic descriptions of food webs. In this dissertation, we expand this approach to tritrophic food web models by including the third trophic level. Using a functional trait approach, coexistence of all species is ensured using fitness-balancing trade-offs. For example, the defense-growth trade-off implies that species may be defended against predation, but this defense comes at the cost of a lower maximal growth rate. In these food webs, the functional diversity on a given trophic level can be varied by modifying the trait differences between the species on that level.
In the first project, we find that functional diversity promotes high biomass on the top level, which, in turn, leads to a reduction in the temporal variability due to compensatory dynamical patterns governed by the top level. Next, these results are generalized by investigating the average behavior of tritrophic food webs, for wide intervals of all parameters describing species interactions in the food web. We find that the diversity on the top level is most important for determining the biomass and temporal variability of all other trophic levels, and show how biomass is only transferred efficiently to the top level when diversity is high everywhere in the food web. In the third project, we compare the response of a simple food chain against a nutrient pulse perturbation, to that of a food web with diversity on every trophic level. By joint consideration of the resistance, resilience, and elasticity, we uncover that the response is efficiently buffered when biomass on the top level is high, which is facilitated by functional diversity on every trophic level in the food web. Finally, in the fourth project, we show that even in a simple consumer-resource model without any diversity, top-down control on the intermediate level frequently causes the phase difference between the intermediate and basal level to deviate from the quarter-cycle lag rule. By adding a top predator, we show that these deviations become even more likely, and anti-phase cycles are often observed.
The combined results of these projects show how the properties of the top trophic level, including its functional diversity, have a decisive influence on the functioning of tritrophic food webs from a mechanistic perspective. Because top species are often among the most vulnerable to extinction, our results emphasize the importance of their conservation in ecosystem management and restoration strategies.
In the light of climate change, rising demands for agricultural products and the intensification and specialization of agricultural systems, ensuring an adequate and reliable supply of food is fundamental for food security. Maintaining diversity and redundancy has been postulated as one generic principle to increase the resilience of agricultural production and other ecosystem services. For example, if one crop fails due to climate instability and extreme events, others can compensate the losses. Crop diversity might be particularly important if different crops show asynchronous production trends. Furthermore, spatial heterogeneity has been suggested to increase stability at larger scales as production losses in some areas can be buffered by surpluses in undisturbed ones. Besides systematically investigating the mechanisms underlying stability, identifying transformative pathways that foster them is important.
In my thesis, I aim at answering the following questions: (i) How does yield stability differ between nations, regions and farms, and what is the effect of crop diversity on yield stability in relation to agricultural inputs, climate heterogeneity, climate instability and time at the national, regional or farm level? (ii) Is asynchrony between crops a better predictor of production stability than crop diversity? (iii) What is the effect of asynchrony between and within crops on stability and how is it related to crop diversity and space, respectively? (iv) What is the state of the art and what are knowledge gaps in exploring resilience and its multidimensionality in ecological and social-ecological systems with agent-based models and what are potential ways forward?
In the first chapter, I provide the theoretical background for the subsequent analyses. I stress the need to better understand the resilience of social-ecological systems and particularly the stability of agricultural production. Moreover, I introduce diversity and spatial heterogeneity as two prominently discussed resilience mechanisms and describe approaches to assess resilience.
In the second chapter, I combined agriculture and climate data at three levels of organization and spatial extents to investigate yield stability patterns and their relation to crop diversity, fertilizer, irrigation, climate heterogeneity and instability and time of nations globally, regions in Europe and farms in Germany using statistical analyses. Yield stability decreased from the national to the farm level. Several nations and regions substantially contributed to larger-scale stability. Crop diversity was positively associated with yield stability across all three levels of organization. This effect was typically more profound at smaller scales and in variable climates. In addition to crop diversity, climate heterogeneity was an important stabilizing mechanism especially at larger scales. These results confirm the stabilizing effect of crop diversity and spatial heterogeneity, yet their importance depends on the scale and agricultural management.
Building on the findings of the second chapter, I deepened in the third chapter my research on the effect of crop diversity at the national level. In particular, I tested if asynchrony between crops, i.e. between the temporal production patterns of different crops, better predicts agricultural production stability than crop diversity. The stabilizing effect of asynchrony was multiple times higher than the effect of crop diversity, i.e. asynchrony is one important property that can explain why a higher diversity supports the stability of national food production. Therefore, strategies to stabilize agricultural production through crop diversification also need to account for the asynchrony of the crops considered.
The previous chapters suggest that both asynchrony between crops and spatial heterogeneity are important stabilizing mechanisms. In the fourth chapter, I therefore aimed at better understanding the relative importance of asynchrony between and within crops, i.e. between the temporal production patterns of different crops and between the temporal production patterns of different cultivation areas of the same crop. Better understanding their relative importance is important to inform agricultural management decisions, but so far this has been hardly assessed. To address this, I used crop production data to study the effect of asynchrony between and within crops on the stability of agricultural production in regions in Germany and nations in Europe. Both asynchrony between and within crops consistently stabilized agricultural production. Adding crops increased asynchrony between crops, yet this effect levelled off after eight crops in regions in Germany and after four crops in nations in Europe. Combining already ten farms within a region led to high asynchrony within crops, indicating distinct production patters, while this effect was weaker when combining multiple regions within a nation. The results suggest, that both mechanisms need to be considered in agricultural management strategies that strive for more resilient farming systems.
The analyses in the foregoing chapters focused at different levels of organization, scales and factors potentially influencing agricultural stability. However, these statistical analyses are restricted by data availability and investigate correlative relationships, thus they cannot provide a mechanistic understanding of the actual processes underlying resilience. In this regard, agent-based models (ABM) are a promising tool. Besides their ability to measure different properties and to integrate multiple situations through extensive manipulation in a fully controlled system, they can capture the emergence of system resilience from individual interactions and feedbacks across different levels of organization. In the fifth chapter, I therefore reviewed the state of the art and potential knowledge gaps in exploring resilience and its multidimensionality in ecological and social-ecological systems with ABMs. Next, I derived recommendations for a more effective use of ABMs in resilience research. The review suggests that the potential of ABMs is not utilized in most models as they typically focus on a single dimension of resilience and are mostly limited to one reference state, disturbance type and scale. Moreover, only few studies explicitly test the ability of different mechanisms to support resilience. To solve real-world problems related to the resilience of complex systems, ABMs need to assess multiple stability properties for different situations and under consideration of the mechanisms that are hypothesized to render a system resilient.
In the sixth chapter, I discuss the major conclusions that can be drawn from the previous chapters. Moreover, I showcase the use of simulation models to identify management strategies to enhance asynchrony and thus stability, and the potential of ABMs to identify pathways to implement such strategies.
The results of my thesis confirm the stabilizing effect of crop diversity, yet its importance depends on the scale, agricultural management and climate. Moreover, strategies to stabilize agricultural production through crop diversification also need to account for the asynchrony of the crops considered. As spatial heterogeneity and particularly asynchrony within crops strongly enhances stability, integrated management approaches are needed that simultaneously address multiple resilience mechanisms at different levels of organization, scales and time horizons. For example, the simulation suggests that only increasing the number of crops at both the pixel and landscape level avoids trade-offs between asynchrony between and within crops. If their potential is better exploited, agent-based models have the capacity to systematically assess resilience and to identify comprehensive pathways towards resilient farming systems.