Filtern
Volltext vorhanden
- nein (72) (entfernen)
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (72) (entfernen)
Gehört zur Bibliographie
- ja (72)
Schlagworte
- Germany (72) (entfernen)
Institut
- Department Psychologie (10)
- Institut für Geowissenschaften (9)
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (8)
- Institut für Umweltwissenschaften und Geographie (8)
- Fachgruppe Politik- & Verwaltungswissenschaft (6)
- Sozialwissenschaften (6)
- Department für Inklusionspädagogik (5)
- Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften (4)
- Fachgruppe Soziologie (4)
- Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik (4)
Over the last three decades, the German political economy can be characterized by both institutional continuity and change. Understanding the dynamics of institutional change therefore requires an examination of the interplay of changes in formal institutional rules and how organizations respond to these changes by strategic attempts to promote or hinder further change in institutions. The macro-level political story of institutional change shows a number of paradoxes resulting in unexpected and often incomplete forms of market liberalization shaped by continued support for some core features of Germany's social market economy. The resulting erosion of Germany's co-ordinated model of economic organization through networks and business associations has gone hand-in-hand with the attempts to preserve these institutions for core workers and sectors of the economy in the face of changing environments. The result is a more varied institutional landscape characterized by international diffusion of liberal policies and the politics of their variable re-embedding within a long-term path of institutional continuity.
This paper analyzes naming behavior in Germany in the context of rapid social change. It begins with an overview of general developments in naming in Germany over the last one hundred years, based on data from the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP), which supplies us with almost 45,000 datasets. The paper focuses on the periods of World War II and the Cold War since we conclude that general developments in naming were disrupted by these two phenomena. Wartime brings accelerated social change in its wake and people react to this social change - often on an apparently individual level. Here, our findings are in accordance with established sociological theories.