Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (62)
- Postprint (20)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Language
- English (83)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (83)
Keywords
- animal personality (18)
- rodents (9)
- Myodes glareolus (8)
- light pollution (6)
- HIREC (5)
- Microtus arvalis (5)
- biodiversity (5)
- giving-up density (5)
- exploratory-behavior (4)
- landscape of fear (4)
- mobile links (4)
- ALAN (3)
- Animal personality (3)
- Interspecific interactions (3)
- Lepus europaeus (3)
- Rodents (3)
- Seasonality (3)
- activity (3)
- agricultural landscapes (3)
- coexistence (3)
- dispersal (3)
- disturbance (3)
- endozoochory (3)
- environmental change (3)
- functional traits (3)
- individual differences (3)
- inter-individual differences (3)
- landscape diversity (3)
- optimal foraging (3)
- plant diversity (3)
- predation risk (3)
- seed bank (3)
- seed dispersal (3)
- seed dispersal syndrome (3)
- solar powered light-emitting diode (3)
- species assembly (3)
- urbanization (3)
- wetland vegetation (3)
- Carabidae beetles (2)
- Common vole (2)
- Emberiza (2)
- Germany (2)
- Illuminance (2)
- Interference (2)
- Movement ecology (2)
- Nest predation (2)
- Nighttime illumination (2)
- Outdoor enclosure (2)
- Puumala virus seroprevalence (2)
- Sexual conflict (2)
- Shrews (2)
- Small mammals (2)
- Space use (2)
- Voles (2)
- animal cognition (2)
- anthropogenic environment (2)
- apodemus-agrarius (2)
- artificial light at night (ALAN) (2)
- automated radio telemetry (2)
- avian personalities (2)
- bank vole (2)
- bank voles (2)
- behavioral flexibility (2)
- behavioral type (2)
- bird migration (2)
- common vole (2)
- coping styles (2)
- costs (2)
- fitness (2)
- fitness consequences (2)
- habitat connectivity (2)
- habitat use (2)
- home range (2)
- individual variation (2)
- life‐history traits (2)
- male bank voles (2)
- maternal aggression (2)
- mustelid predation (2)
- myodes-glareolus (2)
- natal dispersal (2)
- natural-selection (2)
- neophilia (2)
- neophobia (2)
- non-breeding (2)
- novelty (2)
- offspring-defense (2)
- outbreak (2)
- parentage (2)
- perceived predation risk (2)
- personality-traits (2)
- phenology (2)
- population dynamics (2)
- prairie vole (2)
- recognition (2)
- reproductive strategies (2)
- reproductive success (2)
- rural populations (2)
- small mammals (2)
- social information (2)
- space use (2)
- stopover (2)
- stress (2)
- trade-offs (2)
- vole clethrionomys-glareolus (2)
- voles clethrionomys-glareolus (2)
- wildlife corridors (2)
- AES (1)
- Adolescence (1)
- Aggression (1)
- Agricultural intensification (1)
- Agricultural landscape (1)
- AgroScapeLabs (1)
- Artificial light (1)
- Artificial light at night (ALAN) (1)
- Beech fructification (1)
- Behavioural adaptations (1)
- Behavioural type (1)
- Breeding strategies (1)
- Burrow system (1)
- CAP (1)
- Carabidae (1)
- Chronic stress (1)
- Coexistence (1)
- Consistency (1)
- Coping styles (1)
- Counterstrategy (1)
- Dip test (1)
- Ecological niche (1)
- European bat species (1)
- European bats (1)
- European rabbit (1)
- Faecal corticosterone metabolites (1)
- Faecal glucocorticoid metabolites (1)
- Familiarity (1)
- Forest edge (1)
- Functional bat group (1)
- Hedgerow (1)
- High-throughput next-generation sequencing (1)
- Humans (1)
- Hymenolepis (1)
- Infanticide (1)
- Infanticide risk (1)
- Inter-individual differences (1)
- Interspecific interaction (1)
- Intraspecific competition (1)
- Kalahari (1)
- LED (1)
- Land use (1)
- Learning (1)
- Life history (1)
- Light pollution (1)
- MHC diversity (1)
- Menarche (1)
- Migration (1)
- Myodes voles (1)
- Nest protection (1)
- Odour recognition (1)
- Optimal foraging (1)
- Oryctolagus cuniculus (1)
- Overgrazing (1)
- POL (1)
- Personality (1)
- Physiology (1)
- Plasticity (1)
- Pond (1)
- Population cycle (1)
- Population dynamics (1)
- Puumala virus (1)
- Repeatability (1)
- Reproductive strategy (1)
- Risk taking (1)
- Rodent (1)
- Selection (1)
- Sexual selection (1)
- Shrub encroachment (1)
- Small mammal (1)
- Sorex araneus (1)
- Stress (1)
- Stress response (1)
- Survival (1)
- Survival success (1)
- Wind turbines (1)
- Winter biology (1)
- aggression (1)
- agriculture (1)
- animal personalities (1)
- associative learning (1)
- attraction-avoidance (1)
- behavioural adaptations (1)
- behavioural adjustment (1)
- behavioural flexibility (1)
- behavioural reaction norm (1)
- behavioural syndrome (1)
- behavioural type (1)
- biodiversity conservation (1)
- boldness (1)
- burrow system (1)
- cascading effects (1)
- climate change (1)
- community dynamics (1)
- competition (1)
- competitive performance (1)
- conservation scheme (1)
- consistency (1)
- corticosterone (1)
- early experience (1)
- exploitation (1)
- faecal corticosterone metabolites (1)
- fast and slow learner (1)
- field margins (1)
- fine-scale interactions (1)
- foraging behaviour (1)
- illuminance (1)
- individual based modeling (1)
- individual niche specialization (1)
- individual variability (1)
- insectivores (1)
- insects (1)
- inter-specific interactions (1)
- interspecific interactions (1)
- intra-specific trait variation (1)
- juvenile plasticity (1)
- landscape genetics (1)
- life history (1)
- life-history traits (1)
- light spectrum (1)
- long distance movement (1)
- movement behaviour (1)
- movement ecology (1)
- nephropathia epidemica (1)
- nest predation (1)
- nocturnal epigeal insect (1)
- occurrence estimates (1)
- olfactory (1)
- pace-of-life (1)
- parasites (1)
- patch use (1)
- patch use; (1)
- personality (1)
- phenotypic plasticity (1)
- photoperiod (1)
- phototaxis (1)
- plasticity (1)
- population cycles (1)
- priming (1)
- regression tree (1)
- repeatability (1)
- resource (1)
- risk allocation (1)
- rodent (1)
- seasonal environment (1)
- seasonality (1)
- shrews (1)
- social environment (1)
- species coexistence (1)
- spectral irradiance (1)
- speed-accuracy trade-off (1)
- step-selection function (1)
- stress response (1)
- survival (1)
- temperament (1)
- voles (1)
- white light (1)
- winter biology (1)
Institute
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (83) (remove)
Artificial light at night (ALAN) is altering the behaviour of nocturnal animals in a manifold of ways. Nocturnal invertebrates are particularly affected, due to their fatal attraction to ALAN. This selective pressure has the potential to reduce the strength of the flight-to-light response in insects, as shown recently in a moth species. Here we investigated light attraction of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae).We compared among animals (three genera) from a highly light polluted (HLP) grassland in the centre of Berlin and animals collected at a low-polluted area in a Dark Sky Reserve (DSR), captured using odour bait. In an arena setting tested at night time, HLP beetles (n = 75 across all genera) showed a reduced attraction towards ALAN. Tested during daytime, HLP beetles were less active in an open field test (measured as latency to start moving), compared to DSR (n = 143). However, we did not observe a reduced attraction towards ALAN within the species most common at both sides, Calathus fuscipes (HLP = 37, DSR = 118 individuals) indicating that not all species may be equally affected by ALAN. Reduced attraction to ALAN in urban beetles may either be a result of phenotypic selection in each generation removing HLP individuals that are attracted to light, or an indication for ongoing evolutionary differentiation among city and rural populations in their light response. Reduced attraction to light sources may directly enhance survival and reproductive success of urban individuals. However, decrease in mobility may negatively influence dispersal, reproduction and foraging success, highlighting the selective pressure that light pollution may have on fitness, by shaping and modifying the behaviour of insects.
Artificial light at night (ALAN) is altering the behaviour of nocturnal animals in a manifold of ways. Nocturnal invertebrates are particularly affected, due to their fatal attraction to ALAN. This selective pressure has the potential to reduce the strength of the flight-to-light response in insects, as shown recently in a moth species. Here we investigated light attraction of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae).We compared among animals (three genera) from a highly light polluted (HLP) grassland in the centre of Berlin and animals collected at a low-polluted area in a Dark Sky Reserve (DSR), captured using odour bait. In an arena setting tested at night time, HLP beetles (n = 75 across all genera) showed a reduced attraction towards ALAN. Tested during daytime, HLP beetles were less active in an open field test (measured as latency to start moving), compared to DSR (n = 143). However, we did not observe a reduced attraction towards ALAN within the species most common at both sides, Calathus fuscipes (HLP = 37, DSR = 118 individuals) indicating that not all species may be equally affected by ALAN. Reduced attraction to ALAN in urban beetles may either be a result of phenotypic selection in each generation removing HLP individuals that are attracted to light, or an indication for ongoing evolutionary differentiation among city and rural populations in their light response. Reduced attraction to light sources may directly enhance survival and reproductive success of urban individuals. However, decrease in mobility may negatively influence dispersal, reproduction and foraging success, highlighting the selective pressure that light pollution may have on fitness, by shaping and modifying the behaviour of insects.
Welcome to the dark side
(2022)
Differences in natural light conditions caused by changes in moonlight are known to affect perceived predation risk in many nocturnal prey species. As artificial light at night (ALAN) is steadily increasing in space and intensity, it has the potential to change movement and foraging behavior of many species as it might increase perceived predation risk and mask natural light cycles. We investigated if partial nighttime illumination leads to changes in foraging behavior during the night and the subsequent day in a small mammal and whether these changes are related to animal personalities. We subjected bank voles to partial nighttime illumination in a foraging landscape under laboratory conditions and in large grassland enclosures under near natural conditions. We measured giving-up density of food in illuminated and dark artificial seed patches and video recorded the movement of animals. While animals reduced number of visits to illuminated seed patches at night, they increased visits to these patches at the following day compared to dark seed patches. Overall, bold individuals had lower giving-up densities than shy individuals but this difference increased at day in formerly illuminated seed patches. Small mammals thus showed carry-over effects on daytime foraging behavior due to ALAN, i.e., nocturnal illumination has the potential to affect intra- and interspecific interactions during both night and day with possible changes in personality structure within populations and altered predator-prey dynamics.
Fitness, risk taking, and spatial behavior covary with boldness in experimental vole populations
(2022)
Individuals of a population may vary along a pace-of-life syndrome from highly fecund, short-lived, bold, dispersive “fast” types at one end of the spectrum to less fecund, long-lived, shy, plastic “slow” types at the other end. Risk-taking behavior might mediate the underlying life history trade-off, but empirical evidence supporting this hypothesis is still ambiguous. Using experimentally created populations of common voles (Microtus arvalis)—a species with distinct seasonal life history trajectories—we aimed to test whether individual differences in boldness behavior covary with risk taking, space use, and fitness. We quantified risk taking, space use (via automated tracking), survival, and reproductive success (via genetic parentage analysis) in 8 to 14 experimental, mixed-sex populations of 113 common voles of known boldness type in large grassland enclosures over a significant part of their adult life span and two reproductive events. Populations were assorted to contain extreme boldness types (bold or shy) of both sexes. Bolder individuals took more risks than shyer ones, which did not affect survival. Bolder males but not females produced more offspring than shy conspecifics. Daily home range and core area sizes, based on 95% and 50% Kernel density estimates (20 ± 10 per individual, n = 54 individuals), were highly repeatable over time. Individual space use unfolded differently for sex-boldness type combinations over the course of the experiment. While day ranges decreased for shy females, they increased for bold females and all males. Space use trajectories may, hence, indicate differences in coping styles when confronted with a novel social and physical environment. Thus, interindividual differences in boldness predict risk taking under near-natural conditions and have consequences for fitness in males, which have a higher reproductive potential than females. Given extreme inter- and intra-annual fluctuations in population density in the study species and its short life span, density-dependent fluctuating selection operating differently on the sexes might maintain (co)variation in boldness, risk taking, and pace-of-life.
Welcome to the Dark Side
(2022)
Differences in natural light conditions caused by changes in moonlight are known to affect perceived predation risk in many nocturnal prey species. As artificial light at night (ALAN) is steadily increasing in space and intensity, it has the potential to change movement and foraging behavior of many species as it might increase perceived predation risk and mask natural light cycles. We investigated if partial nighttime illumination leads to changes in foraging behavior during the night and the subsequent day in a small mammal and whether these changes are related to animal personalities. We subjected bank voles to partial nighttime illumination in a foraging landscape under laboratory conditions and in large grassland enclosures under near natural conditions. We measured giving-up density of food in illuminated and dark artificial seed patches and video recorded the movement of animals. While animals reduced number of visits to illuminated seed patches at night, they increased visits to these patches at the following day compared to dark seed patches. Overall, bold individuals had lower giving-up densities than shy individuals but this difference increased at day in formerly illuminated seed patches. Small mammals thus showed carry-over effects on daytime foraging behavior due to ALAN, i.e., nocturnal illumination has the potential to affect intra- and interspecific interactions during both night and day with possible changes in personality structure within populations and altered predator-prey dynamics.
Fitness, risk taking, and spatial behavior covary with boldness in experimental vole populations
(2022)
Individuals of a population may vary along a pace-of-life syndrome from highly fecund, short-lived, bold, dispersive “fast” types at one end of the spectrum to less fecund, long-lived, shy, plastic “slow” types at the other end. Risk-taking behavior might mediate the underlying life history trade-off, but empirical evidence supporting this hypothesis is still ambiguous. Using experimentally created populations of common voles (Microtus arvalis)—a species with distinct seasonal life history trajectories—we aimed to test whether individual differences in boldness behavior covary with risk taking, space use, and fitness. We quantified risk taking, space use (via automated tracking), survival, and reproductive success (via genetic parentage analysis) in 8 to 14 experimental, mixed-sex populations of 113 common voles of known boldness type in large grassland enclosures over a significant part of their adult life span and two reproductive events. Populations were assorted to contain extreme boldness types (bold or shy) of both sexes. Bolder individuals took more risks than shyer ones, which did not affect survival. Bolder males but not females produced more offspring than shy conspecifics. Daily home range and core area sizes, based on 95% and 50% Kernel density estimates (20 ± 10 per individual, n = 54 individuals), were highly repeatable over time. Individual space use unfolded differently for sex-boldness type combinations over the course of the experiment. While day ranges decreased for shy females, they increased for bold females and all males. Space use trajectories may, hence, indicate differences in coping styles when confronted with a novel social and physical environment. Thus, interindividual differences in boldness predict risk taking under near-natural conditions and have consequences for fitness in males, which have a higher reproductive potential than females. Given extreme inter- and intra-annual fluctuations in population density in the study species and its short life span, density-dependent fluctuating selection operating differently on the sexes might maintain (co)variation in boldness, risk taking, and pace-of-life.
Welcome to the Dark Side
(2022)
Differences in natural light conditions caused by changes in moonlight are known to affect perceived predation risk in many nocturnal prey species. As artificial light at night (ALAN) is steadily increasing in space and intensity, it has the potential to change movement and foraging behavior of many species as it might increase perceived predation risk and mask natural light cycles. We investigated if partial nighttime illumination leads to changes in foraging behavior during the night and the subsequent day in a small mammal and whether these changes are related to animal personalities. We subjected bank voles to partial nighttime illumination in a foraging landscape under laboratory conditions and in large grassland enclosures under near natural conditions. We measured giving-up density of food in illuminated and dark artificial seed patches and video recorded the movement of animals. While animals reduced number of visits to illuminated seed patches at night, they increased visits to these patches at the following day compared to dark seed patches. Overall, bold individuals had lower giving-up densities than shy individuals but this difference increased at day in formerly illuminated seed patches. Small mammals thus showed carry-over effects on daytime foraging behavior due to ALAN, i.e., nocturnal illumination has the potential to affect intra- and interspecific interactions during both night and day with possible changes in personality structure within populations and altered predator-prey dynamics.
Perceived predation risk varies in space and time. Foraging in this landscape of fear alters forager-resource interactions via cascading nonconsumptive effects. Estimating these indirect effects is difficult in natural systems. Here, we applied a novel measure to quantify the diversity at giving-up density that allows to test how spatial variation in perceived predation risk modifies the diversity of multispecies resources at local and regional spatial levels. Furthermore, we evaluated whether the nonconsumptive effects on resource species diversity can be explained by the preferences of foragers for specific functional traits and by the forager species richness. We exposed rodents of a natural community to artificial food patches, each containing an initial multispecies resource community of eight species (10 items each) mixed in sand. We sampled 35 landscapes, each containing seven patches in a spatial array, to disentangle effects at local (patch) and landscape levels. We used vegetation height as a proxy for perceived predation risk. After a period of three nights, we counted how many and which resource species were left in each patch to measure giving-up density and resource diversity at the local level (alpha diversity) and the regional level (gamma diversity and beta diversity). Furthermore, we used wildlife cameras to identify foragers and assess their species richness. With increasing vegetation height, i.e., decreasing perceived predation risk, giving-up density, and local alpha and regional gamma diversity decreased, and patches became less similar within a landscape (beta diversity increased). Foragers consumed more of the bigger and most caloric resources. The higher the forager species richness, the lower the giving-up density, and alpha and gamma diversity. Overall, spatial variation of perceived predation risk of foragers had measurable cascading effects on local and regional resource species biodiversity, independent of the forager species. Thus, nonconsumptive predation effects modify forager-resource interactions and might act as an equalizing mechanism for species coexistence.
Perceived predation risk varies in space and time. Foraging in this landscape of fear alters forager-resource interactions via cascading nonconsumptive effects. Estimating these indirect effects is difficult in natural systems. Here, we applied a novel measure to quantify the diversity at giving-up density that allows to test how spatial variation in perceived predation risk modifies the diversity of multispecies resources at local and regional spatial levels. Furthermore, we evaluated whether the nonconsumptive effects on resource species diversity can be explained by the preferences of foragers for specific functional traits and by the forager species richness. We exposed rodents of a natural community to artificial food patches, each containing an initial multispecies resource community of eight species (10 items each) mixed in sand. We sampled 35 landscapes, each containing seven patches in a spatial array, to disentangle effects at local (patch) and landscape levels. We used vegetation height as a proxy for perceived predation risk. After a period of three nights, we counted how many and which resource species were left in each patch to measure giving-up density and resource diversity at the local level (alpha diversity) and the regional level (gamma diversity and beta diversity). Furthermore, we used wildlife cameras to identify foragers and assess their species richness. With increasing vegetation height, i.e., decreasing perceived predation risk, giving-up density, and local alpha and regional gamma diversity decreased, and patches became less similar within a landscape (beta diversity increased). Foragers consumed more of the bigger and most caloric resources. The higher the forager species richness, the lower the giving-up density, and alpha and gamma diversity. Overall, spatial variation of perceived predation risk of foragers had measurable cascading effects on local and regional resource species biodiversity, independent of the forager species. Thus, nonconsumptive predation effects modify forager-resource interactions and might act as an equalizing mechanism for species coexistence.
Foraging by consumers acts as a biotic filtering mechanism for biodiversity at the trophic level of resources. Variation in foraging behaviour has cascading effects on abundance, diversity, and functional trait composition of the community of resource species. Here we propose diversity at giving-up density (DivGUD), i.e. when foragers quit exploiting a patch, as a novel concept and simple measure quantifying cascading effects at multiple spatial scales. In experimental landscapes with an assemblage of plant seeds, patch residency of wild rodents decreased local alpha-DivGUD (via elevated mortality of species with large seeds) and regional gamma-DivGUD, while dissimilarity among patches in a landscape (beta-DivGUD) increased. By linking theories of adaptive foraging behaviour with community ecology, DivGUD allows to investigate cascading indirect predation effects, e.g. the ecology-of-fear framework, feedbacks between functional trait composition of resource species and consumer communities, and effects of inter-individual differences among foragers on the biodiversity of resource communities.