Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Postprint (13)
- Article (7)
- Part of Periodical (4)
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (2)
- Master's Thesis (2)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Language
- German (26)
- English (4)
- Multiple languages (2)
Keywords
- Russland (32) (remove)
Institute
The overall objective of the study is an elaboration of quantitative methods for national conservation planning, coincident with the international approach ('hotspots' approach). This objective requires a solution of following problems: 1) How to estimate large scale vegetation diversity from abiotic factors only? 2) How to adopt 'global hotspots' approach for bordering of national biodiversity hotspots? 3) How to set conservation targets, accounting for difference in environmental conditions and human threats between national biodiversity hotspots? 4) How to design large scale national conservation plan reflecting hierarchical nature of biodiversity? The case study for national conservation planning is Russia. Conclusions: · Large scale vegetation diversity can be predicted to a major extent by climatically determined latent heat for evaporation and geometrical structure of landscape, described as an altitudinal difference. The climate based model reproduces observed species number of vascular plant for different areas of the world with an average error 15% · National biodiversity hotspots can be mapped from biotic or abiotic data using corrected for a country the quantitative criteria for plant endemism and land use from the 'global hotspots' approach · Quantitative conservation targets, accounting for difference in environmental conditions and human threats between national biodiversity hotspots can be set using national data for Red Data book species · Large scale national conservation plan reflecting hierarchical nature of biodiversity can be designed by combination of abiotic method at national scale (identification of large scale hotspots) and biotic method at regional scale (analysis of species data from Red Data book)
Discourses of danger are a significant part of security and identity politics. They serve well for analysing the construction of both, security through identity politics, and identity through security policy. In this article, the declaration of the Vilnius Group of February 2003 is used as a point of departure. The author discusses the construction of state and national identities in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania throughout the 1990s by means of security policy, danger discourse, and mechanisms of exclusion. He argues that the replacement of Russia as a threat to Baltic security (in documents and policy manifestations) is a reflection of a relaxation of Baltic-Russian relations as well as an ingredient of the pre-accession strategy towards NATO. Political-military threats are replaced by cultural ones, while Russia, hitherto frequently represented as a concrete danger, gives way to abstractions such as „international terrorism“.