Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (27)
- Article (22)
- Postprint (7)
- Contribution to a Periodical (6)
- Part of a Book (4)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Other (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (69) (remove)
Keywords
- Digitale Plattformen (6)
- Industrie 4.0 (6)
- systematic literature review (6)
- Industry 4.0 (5)
- Maschinen- und Anlagenbau (5)
- digital platforms (5)
- production control (5)
- Digital platforms (4)
- E-Mail Tracking (4)
- ERP (4)
- deep reinforcement learning (4)
- machine learning (4)
- Analytics (3)
- COVID-19 (3)
- Internet of Things (3)
- KMU (3)
- Privacy (3)
- digital learning (3)
- enterprise systems (3)
- production planning (3)
- Chrome (2)
- ERP system (2)
- Firefox (2)
- Geschäftsmodell (2)
- IIoT (2)
- Machine learning (2)
- Machinery and plant engineering (2)
- Platform Innovation (2)
- Plattformtypen (2)
- Strategie (2)
- TAM (2)
- browser platforms (2)
- deep learning (2)
- discipline differences (2)
- e-learning (2)
- enteprise-level (2)
- enterprise system (2)
- information systems research (2)
- modular production (2)
- multi-agent system (2)
- multi-objective optimisation (2)
- neural networks (2)
- platform innovation (2)
- production planning and control (2)
- requirements (2)
- taxonomy (2)
- technology acceptance (2)
- technology-mediated teaching (2)
- university teaching (2)
- Adaptivität (1)
- Altsyteme (1)
- Analytic Infrastructures (1)
- Anti-Tracking Infrastructure (1)
- Anwendungszentrum Industrie 4.0 (1)
- Application success (1)
- Architecture concepts (1)
- Architekturkonzept (1)
- Automatisierung (1)
- Blockchain (1)
- Boundary resources (1)
- Browser Platform (1)
- Browser Platforms (1)
- CPS (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Cloud (1)
- Consensus algorithms (1)
- Coring (1)
- Countermeasures (1)
- Creative process (1)
- Cross-System (1)
- Customer satisfaction (1)
- Customization (1)
- Cyber-Phsysische Systeme (1)
- Cyber-Physical Manufacturing Systems (1)
- Cyber-physical systems (1)
- Data Privacy (1)
- Data privacy (1)
- Decentral Decision Making (1)
- Digital Marketplaces (1)
- Digital Platforms (1)
- Discontinued Features (1)
- Email tracking (1)
- Enterprise Resource Planning (1)
- Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System (1)
- Enterprise System (1)
- Enterprise-grade (1)
- Feature Removal (1)
- Federal states (1)
- Geschäftsmodelle (1)
- Government as a platform (1)
- Individualization (1)
- Industrial Analytics (1)
- Information Security and Privacy (1)
- Integration (1)
- Internet of things (1)
- Invidiuallösungen (1)
- KVP (1)
- Kaizen (1)
- Kunststoffindustrie (1)
- Lean Core (1)
- Lernfabrik (1)
- Lernszenario (1)
- Literature Review (1)
- Machine Learning (1)
- Measuring Efficient Task Processing (1)
- Mobile IIoT-Technologie (1)
- Mobile Software Ecosystems (1)
- Mobile device platforms (1)
- Modeling (1)
- Modification (1)
- Mozilla Firefox (1)
- Newsletter (1)
- Online Dating (1)
- Online Marketing (1)
- Online behavior (1)
- Personalization (1)
- Platform Coring (1)
- Platform delivery strategies (1)
- Platform economy (1)
- Platform types (1)
- Plattform Ökosystem (1)
- Plattform-Bereitstellungsstrategien (1)
- Pockets of creativity (1)
- Potenziale (1)
- Problems (1)
- Process Mining (1)
- Production (1)
- Prozessintegration (1)
- Public sector (1)
- Public service platforms (1)
- Qualität (1)
- RFID (1)
- RPA (1)
- Requirements (1)
- Research Agenda (1)
- Robotic Process Automation (1)
- SME (1)
- Security (1)
- Self-esteem (1)
- Simulation (1)
- Software Platforms (1)
- Software Prototype (1)
- Spielifizierung (1)
- Sustainability (1)
- Systematic literature revieew (1)
- Systematisches Vorgehen (1)
- Systemauswahl (1)
- Tailoring (1)
- Task realization strategies (1)
- Three-tier Architecture (1)
- Tinder (1)
- Verbesserungen (1)
- Verbesserungsprozess (1)
- application center Industrie 4.0 (1)
- automation (1)
- business process platform (1)
- complementary market entry (1)
- coring (1)
- creative process (1)
- cyber-physical production systems (1)
- cyber-physical systems (1)
- data analytics (1)
- data requirements (1)
- data security (1)
- database (1)
- demand forecasting (1)
- digital learning factory (1)
- digital marketplaces (1)
- digitale Plattformen (1)
- eference Architecture Model (1)
- enterprise architecture (1)
- enterprise ecosystems: the integrated enterprise (1)
- evaluation (1)
- federal states (1)
- forecasting data (1)
- forecasting methods (1)
- future (1)
- geographical distribution (1)
- government as a platform (1)
- higher education (1)
- hybrid simulation (1)
- industry 4.0 (1)
- information flow control (1)
- information gateway (1)
- is governance (1)
- it/business alignment (1)
- learning scenario (1)
- levels of information systems research (process, enterprise-, ecosystem- & industry-level) (1)
- literature review (1)
- machinery and plant engineering (1)
- manufacturing industry (1)
- manufacturing processes (1)
- manufacturing systems (1)
- mobile IIoT-technologies (1)
- mobile software ecosystems (1)
- modeling (1)
- organizational level (1)
- plastics industry (1)
- platform acceptance (1)
- platform coring (1)
- platform economy (1)
- platform ecosystem (1)
- platform types (1)
- platform-based business models (1)
- plattformbasierte Geschäftsmodelle (1)
- pockets of creativity (1)
- potentials (1)
- privacy (1)
- problems (1)
- process integration (1)
- production engineering computing (1)
- production networks (1)
- public sector (1)
- public service platforms (1)
- reinforcement learning (1)
- sales forecasting (1)
- simulation (1)
- software platforms (1)
- software selection (1)
- subject differences (1)
- task realization strategies (1)
- third-party developer (1)
- virtual learning (1)
- web-tracking (1)
Increasingly fast development cycles and individualized products pose major challenges for today's smart production systems in times of industry 4.0. The systems must be flexible and continuously adapt to changing conditions while still guaranteeing high throughputs and robustness against external disruptions. Deep rein- forcement learning (RL) algorithms, which already reached impressive success with Google DeepMind's AlphaGo, are increasingly transferred to production systems to meet related requirements. Unlike supervised and unsupervised machine learning techniques, deep RL algorithms learn based on recently collected sensor- and process-data in direct interaction with the environment and are able to perform decisions in real-time. As such, deep RL algorithms seem promising given their potential to provide decision support in complex environments, as production systems, and simultaneously adapt to changing circumstances. While different use-cases for deep RL emerged, a structured overview and integration of findings on their application are missing. To address this gap, this contribution provides a systematic literature review of existing deep RL applications in the field of production planning and control as well as production logistics. From a performance perspective, it became evident that deep RL can beat heuristics significantly in their overall performance and provides superior solutions to various industrial use-cases. Nevertheless, safety and reliability concerns must be overcome before the widespread use of deep RL is possible which presumes more intensive testing of deep RL in real world applications besides the already ongoing intensive simulations.
Das Angebot digitaler Plattformen ist mittlerweile auch im Maschinen- und Anlagenbau weit verbreitet. Dabei konnte in den letzten Jahren der Trend verzeichnet werden, dass die Herstellerunternehmen von Maschinen und An- lagen nicht mehr ausschließlich physische Produkte veräußern, sondern zusätzliche auf das Produkt abgestimmte Dienstleistungen, wie bspw. digitale Services. Dieser Wandel kann einen großen Einfluss auf die Veränderung des Geschäftsmodells ha- ben und je nach Komplexität der digitalen Plattformen unterschiedliche Ausmaße annehmen, die auch strategische Entscheidungen bestimmen können. In diesem Bei- trag wird eine Klassifizierung der digitalen Plattformen im deutschen Maschinen- und Anlagenbau vorgenommen, mithilfe derer unterschiedliche Plattformtypen auf Grundlage ihrer Funktionszusammensetzung identifiziert werden. Demnach können bspw. Plattformen, über die lediglich grundlegende Funktionen wie die Verwaltung von Maschinen angeboten werden, von umfangreicheren Plattformen unterschieden werden, die eine höhere Komplexität aufweisen und somit einen größeren Einfluss auf die Veränderung des Geschäftsmodells haben. Diese Einteilung unterschiedli- cher Plattformtypen kann Unternehmen im Maschinen- und Anlagenbau dabei unter- stützen, strategische Entscheidungen bezüglich der Entwicklung und des Angebots digitaler Plattformen zu treffen und eine Einordnung ihrer digitalen Plattform im Wettbewerb vorzunehmen.
Das Angebot digitaler Plattformen ist mittlerweile auch im Maschinen- und Anlagenbau weit verbreitet. Dabei konnte in den letzten Jahren der Trend verzeichnet werden, dass die Herstellerunternehmen von Maschinen und Anlagen nicht mehr ausschließlich physische Produkte veräußern, sondern zusätzliche auf das Produkt abgestimmte Dienstleistungen, wie bspw. digitale Services. Dieser Wandel kann einen großen Einfluss auf die Veränderung des Geschäftsmodells haben und je nach Komplexität der digitalen Plattformen unterschiedliche Ausmaße annehmen, die auch strategische Entscheidungen bestimmen können. In diesem Beitrag wird eine Klassifizierung der digitalen Plattformen im deutschen Maschinen- und Anlagenbau vorgenommen, mithilfe derer unterschiedliche Plattformtypen auf Grundlage ihrer Funktionszusammensetzung identifiziert werden. Demnach können bspw. Plattformen, über die lediglich grundlegende Funktionen wie die Verwaltung von Maschinen angeboten werden, von umfangreicheren Plattformen unterschieden werden, die eine höhere Komplexität aufweisen und somit einen größeren Einfluss auf die Veränderung des Geschäftsmodells haben. Diese Einteilung unterschiedlicher Plattformtypen kann Unternehmen im Maschinen- und Anlagenbau dabei unterstützen, strategische Entscheidungen bezüglich der Entwicklung und des Angebots digitaler Plattformen zu treffen und eine Einordnung ihrer digitalen Plattform im Wettbewerb vorzunehmen.
Der Wandel zur automatisierten Produktion, die fortschreitende Digitalisierung der Wertschöpfungsprozesse sowie die stetige Implementierung von mobilen Industrial Internet of Things-Technologien (IIoT) in diese zur Unterstützung der Mitarbeiter stellen betriebliche Weiterbildung vor Herausforderungen. Komple-xere Anforderungen und veränderte Tätigkeitsprofile erfordern Handlungskom-petenzen bei Mitarbeitern im Sinne der Fähigkeit, in unbekannten Situationen auf Basis eigenen Könnens handlungsfähig zu bleiben. Jene sowie dafür notwendiges umfassendes Verständnis gegenüber digitalisierten Produktions-prozessen kann jedoch durch konventionelle Lehrmethoden nicht realisiert werden, da diese der erhöhten Anforderungskomplexität und den komplexen Rückkopplungen im Rahmen der Steuer- und Regelkreise nicht gerecht werden können. Diese Aspekte aufgreifend wird im Folgenden ein szenariobasierter Wei-terbildungsansatz für eine Lernfabrik vorgestellt, der insbesondere die Potenziale mobiler IIoT-Technologien zur Ausgestaltung dieser in den Blick nimmt.
The design of qualitative, excellent teaching requires collaboration between teachers and learners. For this purpose, face-to-face teaching benefits from a long-standing tradition, while digital teaching is comparatively still at the beginning of its dissemination. A major developmental step toward the digitization of teaching was achieved in the context of university teaching during the Covid 19 pandemic in spring 2020, when face-to-face teaching was interrupted for months. During this time, important insights into the opportunities and limitations of digital teaching were gained. This paper presents selected results of a study conducted at four German universities and with 875 responses in spring 2020. The study uncovers opportunities and limitations of digital teaching from the students’ perspective and against the background of their experience in the completely digital semester. The results are used as a basis for deriving design guidelines for digital teaching and learning offerings. Based on a model for analyzing the design of teaching and learning formats, these indications are structured according to the elements learners, teachers, teaching content, environment and teaching style.
In response to the impending spread of COVID-19, universities worldwide abruptly stopped face-to-face teaching and switched to technology-mediated teaching. As a result, the use of technology in the learning processes of students of different disciplines became essential and the only way to teach, communicate and collaborate for months. In this crisis context, we conducted a longitudinal study in four German universities, in which we collected a total of 875 responses from students of information systems and music and arts at four points in time during the spring–summer 2020 semester. Our study focused on (1) the students’ acceptance of technology-mediated learning, (2) any change in this acceptance during the semester and (3) the differences in acceptance between the two disciplines. We applied the Technology Acceptance Model and were able to validate it for the extreme situation of the COVID-19 pandemic. We extended the model with three new variables (time flexibility, learning flexibility and social isolation) that influenced the construct of perceived usefulness. Furthermore, we detected differences between the disciplines and over time. In this paper, we present and discuss our study’s results and derive short- and long-term implications for science and practice.
In response to the impending spread of COVID-19, universities worldwide abruptly stopped face-to-face teaching and switched to technology-mediated teaching. As a result, the use of technology in the learning processes of students of different disciplines became essential and the only way to teach, communicate and collaborate for months. In this crisis context, we conducted a longitudinal study in four German universities, in which we collected a total of 875 responses from students of information systems and music and arts at four points in time during the spring–summer 2020 semester. Our study focused on (1) the students’ acceptance of technology-mediated learning, (2) any change in this acceptance during the semester and (3) the differences in acceptance between the two disciplines. We applied the Technology Acceptance Model and were able to validate it for the extreme situation of the COVID-19 pandemic. We extended the model with three new variables (time flexibility, learning flexibility and social isolation) that influenced the construct of perceived usefulness. Furthermore, we detected differences between the disciplines and over time. In this paper, we present and discuss our study’s results and derive short- and long-term implications for science and practice.
Yes, we can (?)
(2021)
The COVID-19 crisis has caused an extreme situation for higher education institutions around the world, where exclusively virtual teaching and learning has become obligatory rather than an additional supporting feature. This has created opportunities to explore the potential and limitations of virtual learning formats. This paper presents four theses on virtual classroom teaching and learning that are discussed critically. We use existing theoretical insights extended by empirical evidence from a survey of more than 850 students on acceptance, expectations, and attitudes regarding the positive and negative aspects of virtual teaching. The survey responses were gathered from students at different universities during the first completely digital semester (Spring-Summer 2020) in Germany. We discuss similarities and differences between the subjects being studied and highlight the advantages and disadvantages of virtual teaching and learning. Against the background of existing theory and the gathered data, we emphasize the importance of social interaction, the combination of different learning formats, and thus context-sensitive hybrid learning as the learning form of the future.
Enterprise solutions, specifically enterprise systems, have allowed companies to integrate enterprises’ operations throughout. The integration scope of enterprise solutions has increasingly widened, now often covering customer activities, activities along supply chains, and platform ecosystems. IS research has contributed a wide range of explanatory and design knowledge dealing with this class of IS. During the last two decades, many technological as well as managerial/organizational innovations extended the affordances of enterprise solutions—but this broader scope also challenges traditional approaches to their analysis and design. This position paper presents an enterprise-level (i.e., cross-solution) perspective on IS, discusses the challenges of complexity and coordination for IS design and management, presents selected enterprise-level insights for IS coordination and governance, and explores avenues towards a more comprehensive body of knowledge on this important level of analysis.