Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (19)
- Conference Proceeding (11)
- Postprint (5)
- Review (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (38) (remove)
Keywords
- 24 h recall (2)
- Athletes (2)
- Calorimetry (2)
- Energy requirement (2)
- Fat-free mass (2)
- Nutritional counseling (2)
- adolescents (2)
- body-mass index (2)
- childhood obesity (2)
- dietary intake (2)
- elite athletes (2)
- forces (2)
- long-distance race car driving (2)
- overweight children (2)
- pilot study (2)
- plantar pressure distribution (2)
- prepubescent children (2)
- prevalence (2)
- sonography (2)
- speed (2)
- walking (2)
- Achilles tendon (1)
- Arch-index (1)
- Children (1)
- Dietary supplements (1)
- Doppler ultrasound (1)
- Elite athletes (1)
- Foot (1)
- Geometry (1)
- Maximal oxygen uptake (1)
- Minerals (1)
- Patella tendon (1)
- Peak fat oxidation (1)
- Plantar pressure (1)
- Prevalence (1)
- Reliability (1)
- Running (1)
- Tolerable upper limits (1)
- Treadmill ergometry (1)
- Variability (1)
- Vitamins (1)
- achilles and patellar tendon (1)
- adolescent athletes (1)
- athletes (1)
- beverages (1)
- bias (1)
- body composition (1)
- carbohydrate sources (1)
- cardiopulmonary exercise testing (1)
- consecutive tests (1)
- dietary records (1)
- dietary supplements (1)
- endurance athletes (1)
- energy intake (1)
- exhaustion (1)
- fatigue (1)
- hyperechogenicities (1)
- hypoechogenicities (1)
- intra- and inter-rater variability (1)
- meal schedule (1)
- minerals (1)
- peak fat oxidation (1)
- reliability (1)
- running (1)
- skinfold thickness (1)
- standard values (1)
- study design (1)
- subcutaneous adipose tissue (1)
- tendinopathy (1)
- tendon diameter (1)
- tendon thickness (1)
- tolerable upper limits (1)
- training adaptation (1)
- treadmill ergometry (1)
- ultrasonography (1)
- ultrasound (1)
- underreporting (1)
- variability (1)
- vascularization (1)
- vitamins (1)
On utilise de plus en plus les tests de verification pour confirmer l'atteinte du consommation d'oxygene maximale (VO(2 max)). Toutefois, le moment et les methodes d'evaluation varient d'un groupe de travail a l'autre. Les objectifs de cette etude sont de constater si on peut administrer un test de verification apres un test d'effort progressif ou s'il est preferable de le faire une autre journee et si on peut determiner le VO(2 max) tout de meme lors de la premiere seance chez des sujets ne repondant pas au critere de verification. Quarante sujets (age, 24 +/- 4 ans; VO(2 max), 50 +/- 7 mL center dot min(-1)center dot kg(-1)) participent a un test d'effort progressif sur tapis roulant et, 10 min plus tard, a un test de verification (VerifDay1) a 110 % de la velocite maximale (v(max)). Le critere de verification est un VO(2) de pointe au VerifDay1 < 5,5 % a la valeur retenue au test d'effort progressif. Les sujets ne repondant pas au critere de verification passent un autre test de verification, mais a 115 % du VerifDay1', et ce, 10 min plus tard pour confirmer le VO(2) de pointe du VerifDay1 en tant que VO(2 max). Tous les autres sujets repassent le VerifDay1 a un jour different (VerifDay2). Six sujets sur quarante ne repondent pas au critere de verification. Chez quatre d'entre eux, on confirme l'atteinte du VO(2 max) au VerifDay1'. Le VO(2) de pointe au VerifDay1 est equivalent a celui du VerifDay2 (3722 +/- 991 mL center dot min(-1) comparativement a 3752 +/- 995 mL center dot min(-1), p = 0,56), mais le temps jusqu'a l'epuisement est significativement plus long au VerifDay2 (2:06 +/- 0:22 min:s comparativement a 2:42 +/- 0:38 min:s, p < 0,001, n = 34). Le VO(2) de pointe obtenu au test de verification ne semble pas conditionne par un test d'effort progressif maximal prealable. On peut donc realiser le test d'effort progressif et le test de verification lors de la meme seance d'evaluation. Chez presque tous les individus ne repondant pas au critere de verification, on peut determiner le VO(2 max) au moyen d'un autre test de verification plus intense.
Changes in performance parameters over four consecutive maximal incremental cycling tests were investigated to determine how many tests can be performed within one single day without negatively affecting performance. Sixteen male and female subjects (eight trained (T): 25 +/- 3 yr, BMI 22.6 +/- 2.5 kg center dot m(-2), maximal power output (P-max) 4.6 +/- 0.5 W center dot kg(-1); eight untrained (UT): 27 +/- 3 yr, BMI 22.3 +/- 1.2 kg center dot m(-2), P-max 2.9 +/- 0.3 W center dot kg(-1)) performed four successive maximal incremental cycling tests separated by 1.5 h of passive rest. Individual energy requirements were covered by standardised meals between trials. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) remained unchanged over the four tests in both groups (P = 0.20 and P = 0.33, respectively). P-max did not change in the T group (P = 0.32), but decreased from the third test in the UT group (P < 0.01). Heart rate responses to submaximal exercise were elevated from the third test in the T group and from the second test in the UT group (P < 0.05). The increase in blood lactate shifted rightward over the four tests in both groups (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively). Exercise-induced net increases in epinephrine and norepinephrine were not different between the tests in either group (P 0.15). If VO2max is the main parameter of interest, trained and untrained individuals can perform at least four maximal incremental cycling tests per day. However, because other parameters changed after the first and second test, respectively, no more than one test per day should be performed if parameters other than VO2max are the prime focus.
Background: Exercising at intensities where fat oxidation rates are high has been shown to induce metabolic benefits in recreational and health-oriented sportsmen. The exercise intensity (Fat(peak)) eliciting peak fat oxidation rates is therefore of particular interest when aiming to prescribe exercise for the purpose of fat oxidation and related metabolic effects. Although running and walking are feasible and popular among the target population, no reliable protocols are available to assess Fat(peak) as well as its actual velocity (VPFO) during treadmill ergometry. Our purpose was therefore, to assess the reliability and day-to-day variability of VPFO and Fat(peak) during treadmill ergometry running. Conclusion: In summary, relative and absolute reliability indicators for V-PFO and Fat(peak) were found to be excellent. The observed LoA may now serve as a basis for future training prescriptions, although fat oxidation rates at prolonged exercise bouts at this intensity still need to be investigated.