Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (40)
- Postprint (27)
- Other (7)
- Conference Proceeding (5)
- Review (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (81) (remove)
Keywords
- yellow flags (8)
- allostatic load (6)
- low back pain (6)
- Functional ankle instability (5)
- MiSpEx (5)
- exercise (5)
- Ankle sprain (4)
- Chronic back pain (4)
- neuroplasticity (4)
- osteoporosis (4)
- psychosocial moderators (4)
- stress (4)
- Ankle injury (3)
- Anti-doping guideline (3)
- Anti-doping program (3)
- Basketball (3)
- Doping (3)
- Elite sports schools (3)
- Exercise (3)
- Perceived ankle instability (3)
- Prevention (3)
- Survey (3)
- chronic back pain (3)
- Aftercare (2)
- Back pain diagnosis (2)
- Back pain prognosis (2)
- Chronic low back pain (2)
- Chronic pain (2)
- Education (2)
- HDL (2)
- Income (2)
- Indicators of socioeconomic status, Health inequality (2)
- Individualized therapy (2)
- Job position (2)
- LDL (2)
- Low back pain (2)
- MRI (2)
- Metabolic syndrome (2)
- MiSpEx Network (2)
- MiSpEx-network (2)
- Mobile diagnostics (2)
- Nutrition (2)
- Office chair (2)
- PROGRESS/TRIPOD (2)
- Pain screening (2)
- Physical activity (2)
- Prediction of disability/intensity (2)
- Pressure distribution (2)
- Prognosis (2)
- Psychosocial risk factors (2)
- RSI (2)
- Randomized controlled trial (2)
- Rehabilitation (2)
- Rural health (2)
- Screening (2)
- Sensorimotor training (2)
- Socioeconomic status (2)
- Sports injury (2)
- Yellow flags (2)
- allostatic load index (2)
- antidepressants (2)
- back pain (2)
- back-pain screening (2)
- biomechanics (2)
- bone mineral density (2)
- bone pathologies (2)
- bone remodeling (2)
- bone–brain–nervous system interactions (2)
- cardiac catheterization (CC) (2)
- childhood (2)
- cholesterol (2)
- chronic low back pain (2)
- chronic pain (2)
- classical conditioning (2)
- clinical pain research (2)
- cortisol (2)
- dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (2)
- disability (2)
- distress (2)
- endocrine pathways (2)
- epinephrine (2)
- executive function (2)
- hair cortisol (2)
- high density lipoprotein cholesterol (2)
- hypocortisolemic symptom triad (2)
- invalidation (2)
- life events (2)
- lipids (2)
- long-term effects (2)
- low density lipoprotein cholesterol (2)
- low-back pain (2)
- low-back-pain (2)
- major depressive disorder (2)
- metabolic syndrome (2)
- microRNA (2)
- mindfulness-based stress reduction (2)
- motor-control-exercise (2)
- multidisciplinary intervention (2)
- multidisciplinary pain treatment (2)
- multidisciplinary-therapy (2)
- multimodal intervention (2)
- neuroendocrine (2)
- norepinephrine (2)
- osteoblast (2)
- osteoclast (2)
- pain matrix (2)
- physical activity (2)
- primary marker (2)
- psychoeducation (2)
- psychosocial risk factors (2)
- psychosocial stress (2)
- relaxation (2)
- self-efficacy (2)
- sensorimotor exercise training (2)
- sensorimotor training intervention (2)
- social pain (2)
- social rejection (2)
- standardized patient information (2)
- stress intervention (2)
- stress management (2)
- stress types (2)
- study protocol (2)
- sustainability (2)
- translation-reliability (2)
- triglycerides (2)
- Ankle sprain; (1)
- CAIT (1)
- CLBP (1)
- Central nervous system (1)
- Chronic ankle instability (1)
- Chronic illness (1)
- Chronische Krankheit (1)
- Chronischer Rückenschmerz (1)
- Cognitive behavioral therapy (1)
- Combined modality therapy (1)
- Dynamic sitting (1)
- Functional capacity (1)
- Indicators of socioeconomic status (1)
- Individualized intervention (1)
- Lebensspanne (1)
- Lifespan (1)
- Medical rehabilitation (1)
- Medizinische Rehabilitation (1)
- Motor control (1)
- Musculoskeletal disorders (1)
- Neuronal plasticity (1)
- PROGRESS (1)
- Pain management (1)
- Peripheral nervous system (1)
- Personalisierte Medizin (1)
- Personalized medicine (1)
- Prognose (1)
- Prävention (1)
- Psychoeducation (1)
- Psychosoziale Risikofaktoren (1)
- Sitting behaviour (1)
- back pain diagnosis (1)
- diagnostics (1)
- education (1)
- exercise treatment (1)
- functional ankle instability (1)
- functional capacity (1)
- health inequality (1)
- income (1)
- individualized intervention (1)
- job position (1)
- low back painExercise (1)
- motor control (1)
- pain screening (1)
- self-report questionnaire (1)
- sensorimotor training (1)
- socioeconomic status (1)
- validity and reliability (1)
Institute
- Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften (37)
- Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften (16)
- Fakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften (10)
- Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät (10)
- Extern (7)
- Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät (2)
- Bürgerliches Recht (1)
- Department Psychologie (1)
- Hochschulambulanz (1)
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (1)
Background: In health research, indicators of socioeconomic status (SES) are often used interchangeably and often lack theoretical foundation. This makes it difficult to compare results from different studies and to explore the relationship between SES and health outcomes. To aid researchers in choosing appropriate indicators of SES, this article proposes and tests a theory-based selection of SES indicators using chronic back pain as a health outcome. Results: Chronic back pain intensity was best predicted by the multidimensional index (beta = 0.31, p < 0.05), followed by job position (beta = 0.29, p < 0.05) and education (beta = -0.29, p < 0.05); whereas, income exerted no significant influence. Back pain disability was predicted strongest by education (beta = -0.30, p < 0.05) and job position (beta = 0. 29, p < 0.05). Here, multidimensional index and income had no significant influence. Conclusions: The choice of SES indicators influences predictive power on both back pain dimensions, suggesting SES predictors cannot be used interchangeably. Therefore, researchers should carefully consider prior to each study which SES indicator to use. The introduced framework can be valuable in supporting this decision because it allows for a stable prediction of SES indicator influence and their hierarchy on a specific health outcomes.
Hintergrund
Lumbale Ruckenschmerzen und ihre Neigung zur Chronifizierung stellen nicht nur in der Allgemeinbevolkerung, sondern auch im Leistungssport ein bedeutendes Gesundheitsproblem dar. Im Gegensatz zu Nichtathleten ist die Erforschung psychosozialer Risikofaktoren sowie von Screeningfragebogen, die moglichst fruhzeitig die Entwicklung chronischer Schmerzen erkennen und vorhersagen konnen, im Leistungssport noch in den Anfangen. Das vorliegende systematische Review gibt einen uberblick uber den Stand der Risikofaktorenforschung in beiden Feldern und untersucht die pradiktive Qualitat verschiedener Screeningfragebogen bei Nichtathleten.
Methodik
Die Literatursuche erfolgte zwischen Marz und Juni 2016 in den Datenbanken MEDLINE, PubMed und PsycINFO mit den Suchbegriffen psychosocial screening, low back pain, sciatica und prognosis, athletes. Eingeschlossen wurden prospektive Studien an Patienten mit lumbalen Ruckenschmerzen mit und ohne Ausstrahlung in das Bein, 18Jahre und mit einem Follow-up von mindestens 3-monatiger Dauer.
Ergebnisse
In das Review zu Screeninginstrumenten wurden 16Studien einbezogen. Alle waren an klinischen Stichproben der Allgemeingesellschaft durchgefuhrt worden. Zu den am haufigsten publizierten Screeningfragebogen gehoren der orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (oMPSQ) mit einer zufriedenstellenden Fruherkennung der Wiederherstellung der Arbeitsfahigkeit sowie das STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT) mit guter Vorhersage schmerzbedingter Beeintrachtigung. Fur die Vorhersage kunftiger Schmerzen eignen sich die Risikoanalyse der Schmerzchronifizierung (RISC-R) und der Heidelberger Kurzfragebogen (HKF).
Schlussfolgerungen
Psychosoziale Risikofaktoren fur chronische Ruckenschmerzen, wie z.B. chronischer Stress, ungunstige Schmerzverarbeitung und depressive Stimmungslagen, werden zunehmend auch im Leistungssport erkannt. Screeninginstrumente, die sich in der Allgemeingesellschaft als hinreichend vorhersagestark erwiesen haben, werden aktuell im MiSpEx-Forschungsverbund auf ihre Eignung uberpruft.
Psychosocial risk factors for chronic back pain in the general population and in competitive sports
(2018)
Lumbar back pain and the high risk of chronic complaints is not only an important health concern in the general population but also in high performance athletes. In contrast to non-athletes, there is a lack of research into psychosocial risk factors in athletes. Moreover, the development of psychosocial screening questionnaires that would be qualified to detect athletes with a high risk of chronicity is in the early stages. The purpose of this review is to give an overview of research into psychosocial risk factors in both populations and to evaluate the performance of screening instruments in non-athletes. The databases MEDLINE, PubMed, and PsycINFO were searched from March to June 2016 using the keywords "psychosocial screening", "low back pain", "sciatica" and "prognosis", "athletes". We included prospective studies conducted in patients with low back pain with and without radiation to the legs, aged ae<yen>18 years and a follow-up of at least 3 months. We identified 16 eligible studies, all of them conducted in samples of non-athletes. Among the most frequently published screening questionnaires, the A-rebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (A-MPSQ) demonstrated a sufficient early prediction of return to work and the STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT) revealed acceptable performance predicting pain-related impairment. The prediction of future pain was sufficient with the Risk Analysis of Back Pain Chronification (RISC-BP) and the Heidelberg Short Questionnaire (HKF). Psychosocial risk factors of chronic back pain, such as chronic stress, depressive mood, and maladaptive pain processing are becoming increasingly more recognized in competitive sports. Screening instruments that have been shown to be predictive in the general population are currently being tested for suitability in the German MiSpEx research consortium.
Screeninginstrumente
(2018)
Background:
Osteoporosis is a growing public health problem. It is known that stress-related diseases such as depression may impair bone quality and lead to osteoporosis. The association between psychosocial stress and bone health may be triggered by alterations of mitochondrial function and cell signaling and intercellular communication. In this context, extracellular vesicles (EVs) may be relevant due to their crucial role in intercellular communicators through the transfer of cargo.
Aim:
This narrative review aims to summarize if the cargo of extracellular vesicles can constitute a biological link between psychosocial stress and osteoporosis.
Methods:
To evaluate this research question, a thorough literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct. The research keywords are allostatic load, bone remodeling, microRNA, osteoblast, and osteoclast. A total of 21 articles were included in the narrative review.
Results:
We found that certain miRNAs in EVs, including miR-126a-3p, miR-128-3p, and miR-187-5p, have been described as crucial players in both psychosocial stress and osteoporosis.
Discussion:
This review describes EVs and their cargo as a potential mediator linking psychosocial stress and osteoporosis for the first time by highlighting common crucial miRNAs. However, based on the included studies, it is unclear whether EV-mediated transport of biological cargoes can alter the function of target cells in a real physiological environment.
Extracellular vesicles: potential mediators of psychosocial stress contribution to osteoporosis?
(2021)
Osteoporosis is characterized by low bone mass and damage to the bone tissue’s microarchitecture, leading to increased fracture risk. Several studies have provided evidence for associations between psychosocial stress and osteoporosis through various pathways, including the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis, the sympathetic nervous system, and other endocrine factors. As psychosocial stress provokes oxidative cellular stress with consequences for mitochondrial function and cell signaling (e.g., gene expression, inflammation), it is of interest whether extracellular vesicles (EVs) may be a relevant biomarker in this context or act by transporting substances. EVs are intercellular communicators, transfer substances encapsulated in them, modify the phenotype and function of target cells, mediate cell-cell communication, and, therefore, have critical applications in disease progression and clinical diagnosis and therapy. This review summarizes the characteristics of EVs, their role in stress and osteoporosis, and their benefit as biological markers. We demonstrate that EVs are potential mediators of psychosocial stress and osteoporosis and may be beneficial in innovative research settings.
Extracellular vesicles
(2021)
Osteoporosis is characterized by low bone mass and damage to the bone tissue’s microarchitecture, leading to increased fracture risk. Several studies have provided evidence for associations between psychosocial stress and osteoporosis through various pathways, including the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis, the sympathetic nervous system, and other endocrine factors. As psychosocial stress provokes oxidative cellular stress with consequences for mitochondrial function and cell signaling (e.g., gene expression, inflammation), it is of interest whether extracellular vesicles (EVs) may be a relevant biomarker in this context or act by transporting substances. EVs are intercellular communicators, transfer substances encapsulated in them, modify the phenotype and function of target cells, mediate cell-cell communication, and, therefore, have critical applications in disease progression and clinical diagnosis and therapy. This review summarizes the characteristics of EVs, their role in stress and osteoporosis, and their benefit as biological markers. We demonstrate that EVs are potential mediators of psychosocial stress and osteoporosis and may be beneficial in innovative research settings.
Background: Chronic ankle instability, developing from ankle sprain, is one of the most common sports injuries. Besides it being an ankle issue, chronic ankle instability can also cause additional injuries. Investigating the epidemiology of chronic ankle instability is an essential step to develop an adequate injury prevention strategy. However, the epidemiology of chronic ankle instability remains unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the epidemiology of chronic ankle instability through valid and reliable self-reported tools in active populations.
Methods: An electronic search was performed on PubMed and Web of Science in July 2020. The inclusion criteria for articles were peer-reviewed, published between 2006 and 2020, using one of the valid and reliable tools to evaluate ankle instability, determining chronic ankle instability based on the criteria of the International Ankle
Consortium, and including the outcome of epidemiology of chronic ankle instability. The risk of bias of the included studies was evaluated with an adapted tool for the sports injury review method.
Results: After removing duplicated studies, 593 articles were screened for eligibility. Twenty full-texts were screened and finally nine studies were included, assessing 3804 participants in total. The participants were between 15 and 32 years old and represented soldiers, students, athletes and active individuals with a history of ankle sprain. The prevalence of chronic ankle instability was 25%, ranging between 7 and 53%. The prevalence of chronic ankle instability within participants with a history of ankle sprains was 46%, ranging between 9 and 76%. Five included studies identified chronic ankle instability based on the standard criteria, and four studies applied adapted exclusion criteria to conduct the study. Five out of nine included studies showed a low risk of bias.
Conclusions: The prevalence of chronic ankle instability shows a wide range. This could be due to the different exclusion criteria, age, sports discipline, or other factors among the included studies. For future studies, standardized criteria to investigate the epidemiology of chronic ankle instability are required. The epidemiology of
CAI should be prospective. Factors affecting the prevalence of chronic ankle instability should be investigated and clearly described.
Background: Chronic ankle instability, developing from ankle sprain, is one of the most common sports injuries. Besides it being an ankle issue, chronic ankle instability can also cause additional injuries. Investigating the epidemiology of chronic ankle instability is an essential step to develop an adequate injury prevention strategy. However, the epidemiology of chronic ankle instability remains unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the epidemiology of chronic ankle instability through valid and reliable self-reported tools in active populations.
Methods: An electronic search was performed on PubMed and Web of Science in July 2020. The inclusion criteria for articles were peer-reviewed, published between 2006 and 2020, using one of the valid and reliable tools to evaluate ankle instability, determining chronic ankle instability based on the criteria of the International Ankle
Consortium, and including the outcome of epidemiology of chronic ankle instability. The risk of bias of the included studies was evaluated with an adapted tool for the sports injury review method.
Results: After removing duplicated studies, 593 articles were screened for eligibility. Twenty full-texts were screened and finally nine studies were included, assessing 3804 participants in total. The participants were between 15 and 32 years old and represented soldiers, students, athletes and active individuals with a history of ankle sprain. The prevalence of chronic ankle instability was 25%, ranging between 7 and 53%. The prevalence of chronic ankle instability within participants with a history of ankle sprains was 46%, ranging between 9 and 76%. Five included studies identified chronic ankle instability based on the standard criteria, and four studies applied adapted exclusion criteria to conduct the study. Five out of nine included studies showed a low risk of bias.
Conclusions: The prevalence of chronic ankle instability shows a wide range. This could be due to the different exclusion criteria, age, sports discipline, or other factors among the included studies. For future studies, standardized criteria to investigate the epidemiology of chronic ankle instability are required. The epidemiology of
CAI should be prospective. Factors affecting the prevalence of chronic ankle instability should be investigated and clearly described.