Refine
Document Type
- Article (20)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (3)
- Postprint (3)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
- Part of Periodical (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (28) (remove)
Keywords
- Reflexion (4)
- professional knowledge (4)
- Lehrerbildung (3)
- physics education (3)
- teacher education (3)
- Fachdidaktik (2)
- Feedback (2)
- Lehrkräftebildung (2)
- NLP (2)
- PCK (2)
- Physics (2)
- Professional Knowledge (2)
- Professionswissen (2)
- Teacher Education (2)
- Unterrichtsplanung (2)
- literature review (2)
- machine learning (2)
- pedagogical content knowledge (2)
- pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) (2)
- pedagogical reasoning (2)
- pre-service teachers (2)
- refined consensus model (RCM) (2)
- reflexion (2)
- repertory grid (2)
- science teaching (2)
- teaching practice (2)
- the Consensus Model (2)
- Attention to classroom events (1)
- Bildungswissenschaft (1)
- Competencies (1)
- Datenanalyse (1)
- Deep learning (1)
- Delphi study (1)
- Deutschland (1)
- Erhebungsinstrument (1)
- Erhebungsinstrumente (1)
- Evaluation (1)
- Fachwissen (1)
- Fortbildung (1)
- Innovative Lehrkonzepte (1)
- Interpretation (1)
- KI-Anwendung (1)
- Kompetenzerwerb (1)
- Konzepte (1)
- Konzeption (1)
- Künstliche Intelligenz (1)
- Lehramtsstudent (1)
- Lehramtsstudium (1)
- Lehrer (1)
- Longitudinal Analysis (1)
- Längsschnittstudie (1)
- Längsschnittuntersuchung (1)
- ML (1)
- Maschinelles Lernen (1)
- Messung (1)
- Motivation (1)
- Natural Language Processing (1)
- Noticing (1)
- Pedagogical content knowledge (1)
- Performance Assessment (1)
- Performanztest (1)
- Physik (1)
- Physikunterricht (1)
- Praxisphasen (1)
- Professional knowledge (1)
- Professionalisierung (1)
- Referendariat (1)
- Reflection (1)
- Reflection Skills (1)
- Reflective writing (1)
- Reflexion (Phil) (1)
- Reflexionskompetenz (1)
- Reflexivity (1)
- Reflexivität (1)
- Schulpraktikum (1)
- Science education (1)
- Student Teachers (1)
- Teacher professional development (1)
- Test (1)
- Testauswertung (1)
- Testinstrumente (1)
- University physics (1)
- Unterrichtsanalyse (1)
- Unterrichtsgestaltung (1)
- Validity (1)
- Validität (1)
- Vernetzung (1)
- Vernetzung Fachwissenschaft (1)
- Vernetzungen (1)
- analysis (1)
- application of artificial intelligence (1)
- artificial intelligence (1)
- concepts (1)
- content knowledge (1)
- enacted PCK (1)
- entrance test (1)
- evaluation (1)
- feedback (1)
- field experience (1)
- generational comparison (1)
- hatural language (1)
- instructional (1)
- instructional explanation (1)
- lesson planning (1)
- longitudinal study (1)
- motivation (1)
- multi-stakeholder (1)
- natural language processing (1)
- networking (1)
- performance assessment (1)
- physics (1)
- practicum (1)
- processing (1)
- professionalization (1)
- quality (1)
- quantitative research (1)
- reflection (1)
- school internship (1)
- teacher knowledge (1)
- teacher professional development (1)
- teacher training (1)
- test instruments (1)
- universitäre Lehrerbildung (1)
Institute
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (15)
- Zentrum für Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung (ZeLB) (12)
- Extern (5)
- Department Erziehungswissenschaft (2)
- Department Linguistik (1)
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (1)
- Institut für Romanistik (1)
- Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät (1)
- Strukturbereich Bildungswissenschaften (1)
Testing the Consensus Model
(2018)
The structure and definition of professional knowledge is a continuing focus of science education research. In 2012, a pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) summit was held and it suggested a model of professional knowledge and skill including PCK, which was later often called the Consensus Model (Gess-Newsome, 2015. A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK summit. In A. Berry, P. J. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Teaching and learning in science series. Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (1st ed., pp. 28–42). New York, NY: Routledge). The Consensus Model proposes a potential powerful framework for the relations among teachers’ different professional knowledge bases, but to date it has neither been investigated empirically nor systematically. In this study, we investigated the relationships suggested by the Consensus Model among different aspects of teachers’ knowledge and skill. A sample of 35 physics teachers and their classes participated in the investigation; both teachers and their students in these classes took paper-and-pencil tests. Furthermore, a lesson taught by each of the teachers was videotaped and analysed. The video analysis focused on the interconnectedness of the content structure of the lesson as representation of the in-class actions of the teachers. The interconnectedness is understood as a direct result of the application of professional knowledge of the teachers to their teaching. The teachers’ knowledge showed no significant influence on the interconnectedness of the lesson content structure. However, the results confirmed the influence of interconnectedness and certain aspects of professional knowledge on students’ outcomes. Therefore, interconnectedness of content structure could be verified as one indicator of teachers’ instructional quality.
Testing the Consensus Model
(2018)
The structure and definition of professional knowledge is a continuing focus of science education research. In 2012, a pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) summit was held and it suggested a model of professional knowledge and skill including PCK, which was later often called the Consensus Model (Gess-Newsome, 2015. A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK summit. In A. Berry, P. J. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Teaching and learning in science series. Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (1st ed., pp. 28–42). New York, NY: Routledge). The Consensus Model proposes a potential powerful framework for the relations among teachers’ different professional knowledge bases, but to date it has neither been investigated empirically nor systematically. In this study, we investigated the relationships suggested by the Consensus Model among different aspects of teachers’ knowledge and skill. A sample of 35 physics teachers and their classes participated in the investigation; both teachers and their students in these classes took paper-and-pencil tests. Furthermore, a lesson taught by each of the teachers was videotaped and analysed. The video analysis focused on the interconnectedness of the content structure of the lesson as representation of the in-class actions of the teachers. The interconnectedness is understood as a direct result of the application of professional knowledge of the teachers to their teaching. The teachers’ knowledge showed no significant influence on the interconnectedness of the lesson content structure. However, the results confirmed the influence of interconnectedness and certain aspects of professional knowledge on students’ outcomes. Therefore, interconnectedness of content structure could be verified as one indicator of teachers’ instructional quality.
Pre-service physics teachers often do not recognise the relevance for their future career in their university content knowledge courses. A lower perceived relevance can, however, have a negative effect on their motivation and on their academic success. Several intervention studies have been undertaken with the goal to increase this perceived relevance. A previous study shows that conceptual physics problems used in university physics courses are perceived by pre-service physics teachers as more relevant for their future career than regular, quantitative problems. It is however not clear, what the students' meaning of the construct 'relevance' is: what makes a problem more relevant to them than another problem? To answer this question, N = 7 pre-service teachers were interviewed using the repertory grid technique, based on the personal construct theory. Nine physics problems were discussed with regards to their perceived relevance and with regards to problem properties that distinguish these problems from each other. We are able to identify six problem properties that have a positive influence on the perceived relevance. Physics problems that are based on these properties should therefore potentially have a higher perceived relevance, which can have a positive effect on the motivation of the pre-service teachers who solve these problems.
Pre-service physics teachers often do not recognise the relevance for their future career in their university content knowledge courses. A lower perceived relevance can, however, have a negative effect on their motivation and on their academic success. Several intervention studies have been undertaken with the goal to increase this perceived relevance. A previous study shows that conceptual physics problems used in university physics courses are perceived by pre-service physics teachers as more relevant for their future career than regular, quantitative problems. It is however not clear, what the students' meaning of the construct 'relevance' is: what makes a problem more relevant to them than another problem? To answer this question, N = 7 pre-service teachers were interviewed using the repertory grid technique, based on the personal construct theory. Nine physics problems were discussed with regards to their perceived relevance and with regards to problem properties that distinguish these problems from each other. We are able to identify six problem properties that have a positive influence on the perceived relevance. Physics problems that are based on these properties should therefore potentially have a higher perceived relevance, which can have a positive effect on the motivation of the pre-service teachers who solve these problems.
Science education researchers have developed a refined understanding of the structure of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), but how to develop applicable and situation-adequate PCK remains largely unclear. A potential problem lies in the diverse conceptualisations of the PCK used in PCK research. This study sought to systematize existing science education research on PCK through the lens of the recently proposed refined consensus model (RCM) of PCK. In this review, the studies’ approaches to investigating PCK and selected findings were characterised and synthesised as an overview comparing research before and after the publication of the RCM. We found that the studies largely employed a qualitative case-study methodology that included specific PCK models and tools. However, in recent years, the studies focused increasingly on quantitative aspects. Furthermore, results of the reviewed studies can mostly be integrated into the RCM. We argue that the RCM can function as a meaningful theoretical lens for conceptualizing links between teaching practice and PCK development by proposing pedagogical reasoning as a mechanism and/or explanation for PCK development in the context of teaching practice.
Science education researchers have developed a refined understanding of the structure of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), but how to develop applicable and situation-adequate PCK remains largely unclear. A potential problem lies in the diverse conceptualisations of the PCK used in PCK research. This study sought to systematize existing science education research on PCK through the lens of the recently proposed refined consensus model (RCM) of PCK. In this review, the studies’ approaches to investigating PCK and selected findings were characterised and synthesised as an overview comparing research before and after the publication of the RCM. We found that the studies largely employed a qualitative case-study methodology that included specific PCK models and tools. However, in recent years, the studies focused increasingly on quantitative aspects. Furthermore, results of the reviewed studies can mostly be integrated into the RCM. We argue that the RCM can function as a meaningful theoretical lens for conceptualizing links between teaching practice and PCK development by proposing pedagogical reasoning as a mechanism and/or explanation for PCK development in the context of teaching practice.
Reflexion ist eine Schlüsselkategorie für die professionelle Entwicklung von Lehrkräften, welche als Ausbildungsziel in den Bildungsstandards für die Lehrkräftebildung verankert ist. Eine Verstetigung universitär geprägter Forschung und Modellierung in der praxisnahen Anwendung im schulischen Kontext bietet Potentiale nachhaltiger Professionalisierung. Die Stärkung reflexionsbezogener Kompetenzen durch Empirie und Anwendung scheint eine phasenübergreifende Herausforderung der Lehrkräftebildung zu sein, die es zu bewältigen gilt. Ziele des Tagungsbandes Reflexion in der Lehrkräftebildung sind eine theoretische Schärfung des Konzeptes „Reflexive Professionalisierung“ und der Austausch über Fragen der Einbettung wirksamer reflexionsbezogener Lerngelegenheiten in die Lehrkräftebildung. Forschende und Lehrende der‚ drei Phasen (Studium, Referendariat sowie Fort- und Weiterbildung) der Lehrkräftebildung stellen Lehrkonzepte und Forschungsprojekte zum Thema Reflexion in der Lehrkräftebildung vor und diskutieren diese. Gemeinsam mit Teilnehmenden aller Phasen und von verschiedenen Standorten der Lehrkräftebildung werden zukünftige Herausforderungen identifiziert und Lösungsansätze herausgearbeitet.
Schulpraktische Phasen stellen eine bedeutende praxisnahe Lerngelegenheit im Lehramtsstudium dar, da sie Raum für umfangreiche Reflexionen der eigenen Lernerfahrung bieten. Das im Studium erworbene theoretisch-formale Wissen steht hierbei dem praktischen Wissen und Können gegenüber. Mit der professionellen Entwicklung im Referendariat, besonders im Kompetenzbereich des Unterrichtens, kann geschlussfolgert werden, dass sich eine Reflexion über eher fachliche Aspekte unter den Studierenden im Referendariat auf eine Reflexion über eher überfachliche und pädagogische Aspekte weitet. Infolge der Analyse von N = 55 schriftlichen Fremdreflexionen von angehenden Physiklehrkräften aus Studium und Referendariat konnte diese Hypothese für den Bereich der Unterrichtsanalyse und -reflexion unterstützt werden. Weiter wurde aus der Videovignette ein Workshopangebot für Lehrkräfte der zweiten und dritten Phase der Lehrkräftebildung entwickelt, erprobt und evaluiert.
Algorithmen als Dozierende?
(2023)
Auf maschinellem Lernen basierende Tools haben schon längst Einzug in unseren Alltag gefunden und so konnten auch in der Lehrkräftebildung erste Anwendungen entwickelt, erprobt und evaluiert werden. Im Teilprojekt Physikdidaktik des Schwerpunktes 2 „Schulpraktische Studien“ wurden auf Basis eines Rahmenmodells für Reflexion (Nowak et al., 2019) automatisierte Analysemethoden (Wulff et al., 2020) entwickelt und fanden Einzug in universitäre fachdidaktische Lehre (Mientus et al., 2021a). Mit dem Projekt konnten Potenziale KI-basierter Unterstützung aufgezeigt und verstetigt sowie spezifische Herausforderungen identifiziert werden. Dieser Beitrag skizziert ausgewählte Anwendungsmöglichkeiten und weiterführende Forschungen unter dem Gesichtspunkt der Akzeptanz computerunterstützter Lehre.