Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (154)
- Postprint (14)
- Conference Proceeding (4)
- Review (3)
- Other (2)
- Part of a Book (1)
Keywords
- Individual-based model (5)
- Individual-based models (5)
- plant functional trait (5)
- Climate change (4)
- climate change (4)
- Non-target terrestrial plants (3)
- Plant community model (3)
- Plant functional types (3)
- biodiversity (3)
- functional traits (3)
- hoverflies (3)
- intraspecific trait variation (3)
- landscape homogenization (3)
- syrphids (3)
- wild bees (3)
- Beneficial mutations (2)
- Biodiversity (2)
- Coexistence (2)
- Community-level effects (2)
- Directional climate change (2)
- Dry land degradation (2)
- Dynamic vegetation models (2)
- East Africa (2)
- Evolution (2)
- Fire (2)
- Fragmentation (2)
- Functional types (2)
- Habitat fragmentation (2)
- Herbicide risk assessment (2)
- IBM (2)
- Individual-based modeling (2)
- LMA (2)
- Landscape of fear (2)
- Limiting similarity (2)
- Mutation rate (2)
- Mutator locus (2)
- Plant height (2)
- Predator-prey interactions (2)
- Rangeland management (2)
- Recombination (2)
- Simulation model (2)
- agricultural landscape (2)
- behavioral plasticity (2)
- buffer zones (2)
- coexistence (2)
- community model (2)
- community theory (2)
- concepts (2)
- coviability analysis (2)
- demographic noise (2)
- developmental canalization (2)
- ecosystem services provisioning (2)
- ecosystems (2)
- environmental change (2)
- environmental noise (2)
- genetic accommodation (2)
- heterogeneity (2)
- individual-based modeling (2)
- limits (2)
- macroecology (2)
- management (2)
- many-to-one genotype–phenotype map (2)
- modern coexistence theory (2)
- niche width (2)
- noise color (2)
- phenotypic plasticity (2)
- population viability analysis (2)
- reaction norms (2)
- resilience (2)
- scale-dependence (2)
- scale-dependency (2)
- sexual species (2)
- shrub encroachment (2)
- solitary bees (2)
- spatially explicit (2)
- species abundance (2)
- stochastic fluctuations (2)
- trait-environment relationship (2)
- (Semi-natural) Grasslands (1)
- 3D-acceleration sensor (1)
- Abandonment (1)
- Above-/below-ground interactions (1)
- Acacia mellifera (1)
- Active movement (1)
- Adaptation options (1)
- Agricultural landscapes (1)
- Agriotes Ustulatus (1)
- Allometry (1)
- Anthropogenic biome (1)
- Aridity gradient (1)
- Baltic Sea (1)
- Bayesian statistics (1)
- Below-ground resources (1)
- Belowground herbivory (1)
- Bet-hedging germination (1)
- Biodiversity Exploratories (1)
- Biodiversity experiments (1)
- Biodiversity theory (1)
- Biological conservation (1)
- Biome (1)
- Biome shifts (1)
- Biomization (1)
- Birds (1)
- Body size (1)
- Boosted regression tree (1)
- Brachypodium hybridum (1)
- Bromus hordeaceus (1)
- Bush encroachment (1)
- CART (1)
- CFR Proteaceae (1)
- CO2 increase (1)
- Ciconia ciconia (1)
- Clonal plants (1)
- Co-existence (1)
- Coexistence mechanisms (1)
- Community (1)
- Community assembly (1)
- Competition-colonization (1)
- Competitive hierarchies (1)
- Connectivity (1)
- Conservation biogeography (1)
- Conservation management (1)
- Decision-making (1)
- Density dependence (1)
- Diabrotica Virgifera Virgifera (1)
- Diversity (1)
- Dormancy (1)
- Drought stress (1)
- Drought-stress (1)
- Dynamic landscapes (1)
- Eco-evolutionary dynamics (1)
- Ecohydrological modeling (1)
- Ecological classification (1)
- Ecological health (1)
- Ecological risk assessment (1)
- Ecology (1)
- Ecosystem functions and services (1)
- Ecotoxicology (1)
- Effect group (1)
- Emergence time (1)
- Environmental filtering (1)
- Environmental heterogeneity (1)
- Environmental relationships (1)
- Eurasian Dry Grassland Group (EDGG) (1)
- European Vegetation Archive (EVA) (1)
- Eutrophication (1)
- Fauna (1)
- Field margins (1)
- Filamentous fungi (1)
- Flora (1)
- Foraging (1)
- Foraging movement (1)
- Forecasting (1)
- Forest change (1)
- Fractal landscapes (1)
- Functional ecology (1)
- Functional trait (1)
- Functional traits (1)
- Functional type (1)
- Fungal foraging (1)
- Fungal highways (1)
- Fungal space searching algorithms (1)
- Global change (1)
- GrassPlot (1)
- Grassland (1)
- Grazing (1)
- Greenhouse experiment (1)
- Guild (1)
- Habitat filtering (1)
- Habitat gradients (1)
- Habitat heterogeneity (1)
- Habitat loss (1)
- Habitat management (1)
- Herbicide (1)
- Herbicide exposure (1)
- Heterogeneity species diversity relationship (1)
- Hierarchical partitioning of variance (1)
- Holocene (1)
- Home range (1)
- Hyperspectral remote sensing (1)
- IBC-grass model (1)
- Indicators (1)
- Individual based simulation model (1)
- Interdisciplinarity (1)
- Interference competition (1)
- Intermediate disturbance hypothesis (1)
- Kettle holes (1)
- Kriging (1)
- Land reform (1)
- Land use intensity (1)
- Land-use intensity (1)
- Landscape (1)
- Larix gmelinii (1)
- Last glacial maximum (1)
- Late Cenozoic (1)
- Leaf area index (1)
- Local adaptation (1)
- Locomotion costs (1)
- Lolium perenne (1)
- Long-distance seed dispersal (1)
- Matrix vegetation (1)
- Metapopulation dynamics (1)
- Microbial community (1)
- Mid-Holocene (1)
- Middle East (1)
- Military areas (1)
- Military conversion (1)
- Modeling (1)
- Modular organisms (1)
- Monitoring programmes (1)
- Multi-grain sampling (1)
- Natura 2000 (1)
- Natura 2000 monitoring (1)
- Nature conservation management (1)
- Nontarget terrestrial plants (1)
- Null models (1)
- ODD model description (1)
- ODD protocol (1)
- ODE model (1)
- PSI (plastic sphere of influence) (1)
- Palaeovegetation (1)
- Permafrost ecosystem (1)
- Phenotypic plasticity (1)
- Plant community (1)
- Plant community modelling (1)
- Plant diversity (1)
- Plant functional trait (1)
- Plant functional traits (1)
- Plant reproduction (1)
- Pollen dataset (1)
- Rainfall gradient (1)
- Rainfall variability (1)
- Regression tree analysis (1)
- Resistance (1)
- Response group (1)
- Riskspreading (1)
- Role-play (1)
- SLA (1)
- Savanna-grassland bistability (1)
- Scale-dependence (1)
- Scirpus maritimus (1)
- Seed competition (1)
- Seed dispersal by wind (1)
- Seed immigration (1)
- Seed mass (1)
- Seed number (1)
- Semi-arid savanna (1)
- Shrub encroachment (1)
- Simulation experiment (1)
- Slime molds (1)
- Slope exposure (1)
- Southern Africa (1)
- Spatially explicit model (1)
- Spatially explicit modelling (1)
- Species co-existence (1)
- Species coexistence (1)
- Species conservation (1)
- Species density (1)
- Species endangerment (1)
- Species frequency (1)
- Specific leaf area (SLA) (1)
- Stochastic differential equations (1)
- Temporal spread (1)
- Time-lag effects (1)
- Trait selection (1)
- Trait-based approach (1)
- Trait-environment relationship (1)
- Uniform sampling (1)
- Vegetation continuum (1)
- Vulnerability (1)
- Wireworms (1)
- adaptation of conservation strategies (1)
- adaptive management (1)
- alpine grassland degradation (1)
- animal movement (1)
- arable land (1)
- asymmetry of competition (1)
- atlas data (1)
- attraction-avoidance (1)
- biodiversity conservation (1)
- biodiversity refugia (1)
- biogeography (1)
- biotelemetry (1)
- butterflies (1)
- citizen science programme (1)
- closed forest (1)
- community assembly (1)
- community dynamics (1)
- competition (1)
- competition intensity (1)
- competition resistance trade-off (1)
- conservation biology (1)
- conservation planning (1)
- conservation targets (1)
- count data (1)
- demographic bottleneck (1)
- demographic properties (1)
- dendroecology (1)
- density dependence (1)
- ecohydrology (1)
- european flora (1)
- experimental plant communities (1)
- extinction debt (1)
- fine-scale interactions (1)
- flight (1)
- flight efficiency (1)
- forest change (1)
- functional types (1)
- grassland diversity (1)
- grassland vegetation (1)
- grid-based simulation model (1)
- habitat fragmentation (1)
- habitat islands (1)
- habitat loss (1)
- herd composition (1)
- hierarchical framework (1)
- home range selection (1)
- hybrid model (1)
- hyper spectral (1)
- importance (1)
- individual based modeling (1)
- individual variability (1)
- individual-based model (1)
- intensity vs (1)
- inter-specific interactions (1)
- intermediate disturbance hypothesis (1)
- island biogeography theory (1)
- island ecology (1)
- isolation (1)
- juvenile mortality (1)
- kernel density estimation (1)
- land-use intensity (1)
- landscape genetics (1)
- latitude (1)
- life history (1)
- livestock (1)
- local abundances (1)
- local convex hull (1)
- long distance movement (1)
- long-term data (1)
- migration (1)
- minimum convex polygon (1)
- mobile links (1)
- model (1)
- model coupling (1)
- morphological plasticity (1)
- movement behaviour (1)
- multi-taxon (1)
- nested plot (1)
- nutrient analogues (1)
- occurrence estimates (1)
- pace-of-life syndrome (1)
- personality (1)
- plant communities (1)
- plant density (1)
- plant-plant interactions (1)
- population-dynamics (1)
- precipitation pattern (1)
- process-based range models (1)
- range distribution (1)
- range filling (1)
- range size (1)
- rangeland management (1)
- recruitment (1)
- remote sensing (1)
- resource selection (1)
- root and shoot competition (1)
- sPlot (1)
- savanna (1)
- savanna resilience (1)
- shrubline (1)
- simulation model (1)
- size dependent mortality (1)
- size distribution (1)
- social environment (1)
- soil moisture (1)
- space use (1)
- spatial-distribution (1)
- spatially explicit model (1)
- species assemblies (1)
- species coexistence (1)
- species density (1)
- species distribution models (1)
- species-area relationship (1)
- species-area relationship (SAR) (1)
- state-space model (1)
- step-selection function (1)
- stocking capacity (1)
- sustainable rangeland management (1)
- telemetry (1)
- threats to biological diversity (1)
- topography (1)
- tracking data (1)
- trait (1)
- transient dynamics (1)
- tree death (1)
- tundra (1)
- variation (1)
- vegetation model (1)
- vegetation-plot database (1)
- white stork (1)
- wireworms coloptera (1)
- zone-of-influence model (1)
Institute
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (151)
- Institut für Geowissenschaften (14)
- Extern (6)
- Institut für Umweltwissenschaften und Geographie (5)
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Musterdynamik und Angewandte Fernerkundung (3)
- Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät (3)
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (2)
- Referat für Presse- und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit (2)
- Zentrum für Umweltwissenschaften (2)
- Institut für Chemie (1)
Home range estimation is routine practice in ecological research. While advances in animal tracking technology have increased our capacity to collect data to support home range analysis, these same advances have also resulted in increasingly autocorrelated data. Consequently, the question of which home range estimator to use on modern, highly autocorrelated tracking data remains open. This question is particularly relevant given that most estimators assume independently sampled data. Here, we provide a comprehensive evaluation of the effects of autocorrelation on home range estimation. We base our study on an extensive data set of GPS locations from 369 individuals representing 27 species distributed across five continents. We first assemble a broad array of home range estimators, including Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) with four bandwidth optimizers (Gaussian reference function, autocorrelated‐Gaussian reference function [AKDE], Silverman's rule of thumb, and least squares cross‐validation), Minimum Convex Polygon, and Local Convex Hull methods. Notably, all of these estimators except AKDE assume independent and identically distributed (IID) data. We then employ half‐sample cross‐validation to objectively quantify estimator performance, and the recently introduced effective sample size for home range area estimation ( N̂ area
) to quantify the information content of each data set. We found that AKDE 95% area estimates were larger than conventional IID‐based estimates by a mean factor of 2. The median number of cross‐validated locations included in the hold‐out sets by AKDE 95% (or 50%) estimates was 95.3% (or 50.1%), confirming the larger AKDE ranges were appropriately selective at the specified quantile. Conversely, conventional estimates exhibited negative bias that increased with decreasing N̂ area. To contextualize our empirical results, we performed a detailed simulation study to tease apart how sampling frequency, sampling duration, and the focal animal's movement conspire to affect range estimates. Paralleling our empirical results, the simulation study demonstrated that AKDE was generally more accurate than conventional methods, particularly for small N̂ area. While 72% of the 369 empirical data sets had >1,000 total observations, only 4% had an N̂ area >1,000, where 30% had an N̂ area <30. In this frequently encountered scenario of small N̂ area, AKDE was the only estimator capable of producing an accurate home range estimate on autocorrelated data.
Environmental heterogeneity is a major determinant of plant population dynamics. In semi-arid Kalahari savannas, heterogeneity is created by savanna structure, i.e. by the spatial arrangement and temporal dynamics of woody plant and open grassland microsites. We formulate a conceptual model describing the effects of savanna dynamics on the population dynamics of the animal-dispersed shrub Grewia flava. From empirical results we derive model rules describing effects of savanna structure on several processes in Grewia's life cycle. By formulating the model, we summarise existing information on Grewia demography and identify gaps in this knowledge. Despite a number of such gaps, the model can be used to make certain quantitative predictions. As an example, we apply the model to investigate the role of seed dispersal in Grewia encroachment on rangelands. Model results show that cattle promote encroachment by depositing substantial numbers of seeds in open areas, where Grewia is otherwise dispersal-limited. Finally, we draw some general conclusions about Grewia's life history and population dynamics. Under natural conditions, concentrated seed deposition under woody plants appears to be a key process causing the observed association between Grewia and other woody plants. Furthermore, low rates of recruitment and high adult survival result in slow-motion dynamics of Grewia populations. As a consequence, Grewia populations interact with savanna dynamics on long temporal and short to intermediate spatial scales.
Plants located adjacent to agricultural fields are important for maintaining biodiversity in semi-natural landscapes. To avoid undesired impacts on these plants due to herbicide application on the arable fields, regulatory risk assessments are conducted prior to registration to ensure proposed uses of plant protection products do not present an unacceptable risk. The current risk assessment approach for these non-target terrestrial plants (NTTPs) examines impacts at the individual-level as a surrogate approach for protecting the plant community due to the inherent difficulties of directly assessing population or community level impacts. However, modelling approaches are suitable higher tier tools to upscale individual-level effects to community level. IBC-grass is a sophisticated plant community model, which has already been applied in several studies. However, as it is a console application software, it was not deemed sufficiently user-friendly for risk managers and assessors to be conveniently operated without prior expertise in ecological models. Here, we present a user-friendly and open source graphical user interface (GUI) for the application of IBC-grass in regulatory herbicide risk assessment. It facilitates the use of the plant community model for predicting long-term impacts of herbicide applications on NTTP communities. The GUI offers two options to integrate herbicide impacts: (1) dose responses based on current standard experiments (acc. to testing guidelines) and (2) based on specific effect intensities. Both options represent suitable higher tier options for future risk assessments of NTTPs as well as for research on the ecological relevance of effects.
Conservation actions need to account for global climate change and adapt to it. The body of the literature on adaptation options is growing rapidly, but their feasibility and current state of implementation are rarely assessed. We discussed the practicability of adaptation options with conservation managers analysing three fields of action: reducing the vulnerability of conservation management, reducing the vulnerability of conservation targets (i.e. biodiversity) and climate change mitigation. For all options, feasibility, current state of implementation and existing obstacles to implementation were analysed, using the Federal State of Brandenburg, Germany, as a case study. Practitioners considered a large number of options useful, most of which have already been implemented at least in part. Those options considered broadly implemented resemble mainly conventional measures of conservation without direct relation to climate change. Managers are facing several obstacles for adapting to climate change, including political reluctance to change, financial and staff shortages in conservation administrations and conflictive EU funding schemes in agriculture. A certain reluctance to act, due to the high degree of uncertainty with regard to climate change scenarios and impacts, is widespread. A lack of knowledge of appropriate methods such as adaptive management often inhibits the implementation of adaptation options in the field of planning and management. Based on the findings for Brandenburg, we generally conclude that it is necessary to focus in particular on options that help to reduce vulnerability of conservation management itself, i.e. those that enhance management effectiveness. For instance, adaptive and proactive risk management can be applied as a no-regrets option, independently from specific climate change scenarios or impacts, strengthening action under uncertainty.
Populations adapt to novel environmental conditions by genetic changes or phenotypic plasticity. Plastic responses are generally faster and can buffer fitness losses under variable conditions. Plasticity is typically modeled as random noise and linear reaction norms that assume simple one-to- one genotype–phenotype maps and no limits to the phenotypic response. Most studies on plasticity have focused on its effect on population viability. However, it is not clear, whether the advantage of plasticity depends solely on environmental fluctuations or also on the genetic and demographic properties (life histories) of populations. Here we present an individual-based model and study the relative importance of adaptive and nonadaptive plasticity for populations of sexual species with different life histories experiencing directional stochastic climate change. Environmental fluctuations were simulated using differentially autocorrelated climatic stochasticity or noise color, and scenarios of directiona
climate change. Nonadaptive plasticity was simulated as a random environmental effect on trait development, while adaptive plasticity as a linear, saturating, or sinusoidal reaction norm. The last two imposed limits to the plastic response and emphasized flexible interactions of the genotype with the environment. Interestingly, this assumption led to (a) smaller phenotypic than genotypic variance in the population (many-to- one genotype–phenotype map) and the coexistence of polymorphisms, and (b) the maintenance of higher genetic variation—compared to linear reaction norms and genetic determinism—even when the population was exposed to a constant environment for several generations. Limits to plasticity led to genetic accommodation, when costs were negligible, and to the appearance of cryptic variation when limits were exceeded. We found that adaptive plasticity promoted population persistence under red environmental noise and was particularly important for life histories with low fecundity. Populations produing more offspring could cope with environmental fluctuations solely by genetic changes or random plasticity, unless environmental change was too fast.
Populations adapt to novel environmental conditions by genetic changes or phenotypic plasticity. Plastic responses are generally faster and can buffer fitness losses under variable conditions. Plasticity is typically modeled as random noise and linear reaction norms that assume simple one-to- one genotype–phenotype maps and no limits to the phenotypic response. Most studies on plasticity have focused on its effect on population viability. However, it is not clear, whether the advantage of plasticity depends solely on environmental fluctuations or also on the genetic and demographic properties (life histories) of populations. Here we present an individual-based model and study the relative importance of adaptive and nonadaptive plasticity for populations of sexual species with different life histories experiencing directional stochastic climate change. Environmental fluctuations were simulated using differentially autocorrelated climatic stochasticity or noise color, and scenarios of directiona
climate change. Nonadaptive plasticity was simulated as a random environmental effect on trait development, while adaptive plasticity as a linear, saturating, or sinusoidal reaction norm. The last two imposed limits to the plastic response and emphasized flexible interactions of the genotype with the environment. Interestingly, this assumption led to (a) smaller phenotypic than genotypic variance in the population (many-to- one genotype–phenotype map) and the coexistence of polymorphisms, and (b) the maintenance of higher genetic variation—compared to linear reaction norms and genetic determinism—even when the population was exposed to a constant environment for several generations. Limits to plasticity led to genetic accommodation, when costs were negligible, and to the appearance of cryptic variation when limits were exceeded. We found that adaptive plasticity promoted population persistence under red environmental noise and was particularly important for life histories with low fecundity. Populations produing more offspring could cope with environmental fluctuations solely by genetic changes or random plasticity, unless environmental change was too fast.
Wild bee species are important pollinators in agricultural landscapes. However, population decline was reported over the last decades and is still ongoing. While agricultural intensification is a major driver of the rapid loss of pollinating species, transition zones between arable fields and forest or grassland patches, i.e., agricultural buffer zones, are frequently mentioned as suitable mitigation measures to support wild bee populations and other pollinator species. Despite the reported general positive effect, it remains unclear which amount of buffer zones is needed to ensure a sustainable and permanent impact for enhancing bee diversity and abundance. To address this question at a pollinator community level, we implemented a process-based, spatially explicit simulation model of functional bee diversity dynamics in an agricultural landscape. More specifically, we introduced a variable amount of agricultural buffer zones (ABZs) at the transition of arable to grassland, or arable to forest patches to analyze the impact on bee functional diversity and functional richness. We focused our study on solitary bees in a typical agricultural area in the Northeast of Germany. Our results showed positive effects with at least 25% of virtually implemented agricultural buffer zones. However, higher amounts of ABZs of at least 75% should be considered to ensure a sufficient increase in Shannon diversity and decrease in quasi-extinction risks. These high amounts of ABZs represent effective conservation measures to safeguard the stability of pollination services provided by solitary bee species. As the model structure can be easily adapted to other mobile species in agricultural landscapes, our community approach offers the chance to compare the effectiveness of conservation measures also for other pollinator communities in future.
Wild bee species are important pollinators in agricultural landscapes. However, population decline was reported over the last decades and is still ongoing. While agricultural intensification is a major driver of the rapid loss of pollinating species, transition zones between arable fields and forest or grassland patches, i.e., agricultural buffer zones, are frequently mentioned as suitable mitigation measures to support wild bee populations and other pollinator species. Despite the reported general positive effect, it remains unclear which amount of buffer zones is needed to ensure a sustainable and permanent impact for enhancing bee diversity and abundance. To address this question at a pollinator community level, we implemented a process-based, spatially explicit simulation model of functional bee diversity dynamics in an agricultural landscape. More specifically, we introduced a variable amount of agricultural buffer zones (ABZs) at the transition of arable to grassland, or arable to forest patches to analyze the impact on bee functional diversity and functional richness. We focused our study on solitary bees in a typical agricultural area in the Northeast of Germany. Our results showed positive effects with at least 25% of virtually implemented agricultural buffer zones. However, higher amounts of ABZs of at least 75% should be considered to ensure a sufficient increase in Shannon diversity and decrease in quasi-extinction risks. These high amounts of ABZs represent effective conservation measures to safeguard the stability of pollination services provided by solitary bee species. As the model structure can be easily adapted to other mobile species in agricultural landscapes, our community approach offers the chance to compare the effectiveness of conservation measures also for other pollinator communities in future.
Understanding and predicting the composition and spatial structure of communities is a central challenge in ecology. An important structural property of animal communities is the distribution of individual home ranges. Home range formation is controlled by resource heterogeneity, the physiology and behaviour of individual animals, and their intra- and interspecific interactions. However, a quantitative mechanistic understanding of how home range formation influences community composition is still lacking. To explore the link between home range formation and community composition in heterogeneous landscapes we combine allometric relationships for physiological properties with an algorithm that selects optimal home ranges given locomotion costs, resource depletion and competition in a spatially-explicit individual-based modelling framework. From a spatial distribution of resources and an input distribution of animal body mass, our model predicts the size and location of individual home ranges as well as the individual size distribution (ISD) in an animal community. For a broad range of body mass input distributions, including empirical body mass distributions of North American and Australian mammals, our model predictions agree with independent data on the body mass scaling of home range size and individual abundance in terrestrial mammals. Model predictions are also robust against variation in habitat productivity and landscape heterogeneity. The combination of allometric relationships for locomotion costs and resource needs with resource competition in an optimal foraging framework enables us to scale from individual properties to the structure of animal communities in heterogeneous landscapes. The proposed spatially-explicit modelling concept not only allows for detailed investigation of landscape effects on animal communities, but also provides novel insights into the mechanisms by which resource competition in space shapes animal communities.
In a selected literature survey we reviewed studies on the habitat heterogeneity-animal species diversity relationship and evaluated whether there are uncertainties and biases in its empirical support. We reviewed 85 publications for the period 1960-2003. We screened each publication for terms that were used to define habitat heterogeneity, the animal species group and ecosystem studied, the definition of the structural variable, the measurement of vegetation structure and the temporal and spatial scale of the study. The majority of studies found a positive correlation between habitat heterogeneity/diversity and animal species diversity. However, empirical support for this relationship is drastically biased towards studies of vertebrates and habitats under anthropogenic influence. In this paper we show that ecological effects of habitat heterogeneity may vary considerably between species groups depending on whether structural attributes are perceived as heterogeneity or fragmentation. Possible effects may also vary relative to the structural variable measured. Based upon this, we introduce a classification framework that may be used for across-studies comparisons. Moreover, the effect of habitat heterogeneity for one species group may differ in relation to the spatial scale. In several studies, however, different species groups are closely linked to 'keystone structures' that determine animal species diversity by their presence. Detecting crucial keystone structures of the vegetation has profound implications for nature conservation and biodiversity management.