Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (73)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (73) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (73) (remove)
Keywords
Institute
For Charles Goodwin, Chuck
(2018)
This appreciation will not be a testimonial to Chuck’s numerous publications and research achievements – I am sure that others will have a lot to say about those. Instead, I will say something about how I personally experienced and think of him, as a researcher personality, based on the limited time and the few occasions that we have had together.
Interactional linguistics is grounded on the premise that language should not be analyzed in terms of context‐free linguistic structures but as a resource for the accomplishment of actions in social interaction. With this in mind, interactional linguistics takes an interdisciplinary approach to a linguistic analysis that aims at an understanding of how language is both shaped by and itself shapes the actions it is used for. Interactional linguistics combines an interest in linguistic phenomena and structures with the theory and methodology of conversation analysis (CA) and contextualization theory (CT). It is conceptualized as an interface between linguistic analysis and the analysis of social interaction.
Gemeinsame Anfänge
(2020)
Dieser Aufsatz ist eine persönlich-biographische Würdigung für Ewald Reuter, mit Fokus auf die Anfänge unserer gemeinsamen Entwicklung zum Sprachwissenschaftler bzw. zur Sprachwissen-schaftlerin im Rahmen des sozio-kulturellen Milieus der Fakultät für Linguistik und Literatur-wissenschaft (LiLi-Fakultät) der Universität Bielefeld in den 1970iger Jahren.
The paper investigates cases in which the recipients' affiliation with the speaker's affect in telling a complaint story is not (or not only) expressed through assessments or shorter comments or response cries but (also) through tellings of a complaint story of their own. After first complaint stories, next speakers may continue with similar or contrasting second or subsequent stories, in order to accomplish affiliation with the prior speaker's story and affective stance. Similar stories are contextualized as such with similar footings or similar embodiments; contrasting stories are contextualized as such with other footings and/or other embodiments. Nevertheless, not all subsequent stories are receipted as affiliative: the study of a deviant case shows how a subsequent story can be produced and treated as disaffiliative.