Refine
Year of publication
- 2018 (17) (remove)
Document Type
- Postprint (11)
- Article (3)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (2)
- Part of a Book (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (17)
Keywords
- Affective Computing (2)
- German colonialism (2)
- Italy (2)
- affect (2)
- disposition (2)
- emotions (2)
- event (2)
- eventology (2)
- genealogy (2)
- psychopower (2)
Institute
- Philosophische Fakultät (17) (remove)
Literaturen der Welt
(2018)
Wovon sprechen wir, wenn wir von Weltliteratur sprechen? Seit seiner goetheschen Prägung hat der Begriff der ‚Weltliteratur‘ immer wieder und auch in jüngerer Zeit eine breite Debatte innerhalb der philologischen Disziplinen erfahren. Dabei ist es spätestens seit Mitte des 20. Jahrhunderts nicht mehr ausreichend, einen politischen Schlüsselbegriff in einen „vereinheitlichenden Singular“ zu verpacken: Die Heterogenität eines weltweit sich erstreckenden literarischen Feldes sowie historisch involvierter Mechanismen zumeist europäischer Zentralisierung bleiben nach wie vor unbeachtet. Eine verfestigte Literaturpolitik des Kanonischen suggeriert hier allein schon begrifflich einen exklusiven Deutungsanspruch des Weltliterarischen.
Daher bedarf es einer kritischen Fundierung zugunsten einer pluralisierenden Öffnung der Literaturwissenschaften auf die „Literaturen der Welt“. Der vorliegende Band verhandelt Ansätze, Analysen und Kritikpunkte der Literatur- und Kulturwissenschaft, Geschichte, Übersetzungswissenschaft, Soziologie und Genderforschung, die ein solches Unterfangen begleiten und vertiefen.
Der Band untersucht aus historisch-epistemologischer und metaphorologischer Perspektive die Maschine des Lebens und das Leben der Maschine in Literatur, Philosophie und Wissenschaft. Er spannt einen Bogen von der Mechanik der frühen Neuzeit über die Thermodynamik bis hin zur Kybernetik und ihren den Dualismus scheinbar nivellierenden Anspruch. Unkonventionelle Aktoren in der Nanotechnologie und Maschinen als tragische Helden im Gegenwartstheater bilden den Kulminationspunkt, der zugleich einen Versuch darstellt, die Theoriebildung der Actor-Network-Theory weiter zu entwickeln.
‘Hasty observations’?
(2018)
This article examines geographical field research in Albania and Montenegro under Austro-Hungarian occupation, which lasted from 1916 to 1918. It focusses on one of the most important German-speaking geographers of the early 20 th century, Eugen Oberhummer (1859–1944), a pupil of Friedrich Ratzel, the founder of German geo-politics. In 1917 and 1918, Oberhummer went on two expeditions to Montenegro and Albania during the First World War. He already had travelled in four continents and vaguely knew the Western Balkans from an expedition in 1907. It will be argued that the actual situation in Albania and Montenegro did not alter, but did rather reinforce Oberhummer’s attitudes and opinions on the ‘other’ he encountered. Thus, the two war expeditions – Oberhummer primarily met high-ranking Austro-Hungarian officials and only few locals – confirmed his expectations basing on his ‘Ratzelian’ theoretical conceptions. It will further be argued that – in contrast to the much younger and less experienced ‘scholars-at-arms’ of the expedition of 1916 – war and violence were of secondary relevance for the well-travelled and renowned professor of geography in his late 50s. Neither in Oberhummer’s articles nor in his diaries the war and the occupation of Albania and Montenegro made up an important part. In Oberhummer’s ‘Ratzelian’ view, humans could not change or over-come the basic features of geography, as humans were clearly subordinated to the elemental forces of geography. People, over generations, adapted to geography, not the other way round. The on-going First World War was an opportunity for Oberhummer to travel to Albania and Montenegro, but the guerrilla warfare in large parts of Montenegro, the violence against the civilian population, and the fighting at the Albanian front were of secondary relevance and interest for him. Nevertheless, what Oberhummer observed offers great insights into the Austro-Hungarian occupation of Montenegro and Albania from the perspective of a renowned and – given the general circumstances – pleasantly relaxed Ratzelian geographer at the height of his academic career.
This paper offers an exploratory Interactional Linguistic account of the role that inferences play in episodes of ordinary conversational interaction. To this end, it systematically reconsiders the conversational practice of using the lexico-syntactic format oh that's right to implicitly claim "just-now" recollection of something previously known, but momentarily confused or forgotten. The analyses reveal that this practice typically occurs as part of a larger sequential pattern that the participants orient to and which serves as a procedure for dealing with, and generating an account for, one participant's production of an inapposite action. As will be shown, the instantiation and progressive realization of this sequential procedure requires local inferential work from the participants. While some facets of this inferential work appear to be shaped by the particular context of the ongoing interaction, others are integral to the workings of the sequence as such. Moreover, the analyses suggest that participants' understanding of oh that's right as embodying an implicit memory claim rests on an inference which is based on a kind of semantic-pragmatic compositionality. The paper thus illustrates how inferences in conversational interaction can be systematically studied and points to the merits of combining an interactional and a linguistic perspective.
Stuck in the past?
(2018)
After the Civil War the Spanish army functioned as a guardian of domestic order, but suffered from antiquated material and little financial means. These factors have been described as fundamental reasons for the army’s low potential wartime capability. This article draws on British and German sources to demonstrate how Spanish military culture prevented an augmented effectiveness and organisational change. Claiming that the army merely lacked funding and modern equipment, falls considerably short in grasping the complexities of military effectiveness and organisational cultures, and might prove fatal for current attempts to develop foreign armed forces in conflict or post-conflict zones.
Forging an Italian hero?
(2018)
Over the last two decades, Amedeo Guillet (1909–2010) has been turned into a public and military hero. His exploits as a guerrilla leader in Italian East Africa in 1941 have been exaggerated to forge a narrative of an honourable resistance against overwhelming odds. Thereby, Guillet has been showcased as a romanticized colonial explorer who was an apolitical and timeless Italian officer. He has been compared to Lawrence of Arabia in order to raise his international visibility, while his genuine Italian brand is perpetuated domestically. By elevating him to an official role model, the Italian Army has gained a focal point for military heroism that was also acceptable in the public memory as the embodiment of a ‘glorious’ defeat narrative.
Affect Disposition(ing)
(2018)
The “affective turn” has been primarily concerned not with what affect is, but what it does. This article focuses on yet another shift towards how affect gets organized, i.e., how it is produced, classified, and controlled. It proposes a genealogical as well as a critical approach to the organization of affect and distinguishes between several “affect disposition(ing) regimes”—meaning paradigms of how to interpret and manage affects, for e.g., encoding them as byproducts of demonic possession, judging them in reference to a moralistic framework, or subsuming them under an industrial regime. Bernard Stiegler’s concept of psychopower will be engaged at one point and expanded to include social media and affective technologies, especially Affective Computing. Finally, the industrialization and cybernetization of affect will be contrasted with poststructuralist interpretations of affects as events.
Affect Disposition(ing)
(2018)
The “affective turn” has been primarily concerned not with what affect is, but what it does. This article focuses on yet another shift towards how affect gets organized, i.e., how it is produced, classified, and controlled. It proposes a genealogical as well as a critical approach to the organization of affect and distinguishes between several “affect disposition(ing) regimes”—meaning paradigms of how to interpret and manage affects, for e.g., encoding them as byproducts of demonic possession, judging them in reference to a moralistic framework, or subsuming them under an industrial regime. Bernard Stiegler’s concept of psychopower will be engaged at one point and expanded to include social media and affective technologies, especially Affective Computing. Finally, the industrialization and cybernetization of affect will be contrasted with poststructuralist interpretations of affects as events.