Refine
Year of publication
- 2017 (12) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (4)
- Postprint (2)
- Review (2)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Master's Thesis (1)
- Preprint (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (12)
Keywords
- Diskurs (1)
- Ethics (1)
- Fluchen (1)
- Isabella Bird (1)
- Japan (1)
- Persia (1)
- Progress (1)
- Racism (1)
- Schimpfwörter (1)
- Slavery (1)
Institute
- Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik (12) (remove)
This article considers Isabella Bird’s representation of medicine in Unbeaten Tracks in Japan (1880) and Journeys in Persia and Kurdistan (1891), the two books in which she engages most extensively with both local (Chinese/Islamic) and Western medical science and practice. I explore how Bird uses medicine to assert her narrative authority and define her travelling persona in opposition to local medical practitioners. I argue that her ambivalence and the unease she frequently expresses concerning medical practice (expressed particularly in her later adoption of the Persian appellation “Feringhi Hakīm” [European physician] to describe her work) serves as a means for her to negotiate the colonial and gendered pressures on Victorian medicine. While in Japan this attitude works to destabilise her hierarchical understanding of science and results in some acknowledgement of traditional Japanese traditions, in Persia it functions more to disguise her increasing collusion with overt British colonial ambitions.
Postcolonial Justice' addresses a major issue in current postcolonial theory and beyond, namely, the question of how to reconcile an ethics grounded in the reciprocal acknowledgment of diversity and difference with the normative, if not universal thrust that appears to energize any notion of justice. The concept of postcolonial justice shared by the essays in this volume carries an unwavering commitment to difference within and beyond Europe, while equally rejecting radical cultural essentialisms, which refuse to engage in "utopian ideals" of convivial exchange across a plurality of subject positions. Such utopian ideals can no longer claim universal validity, as in the tradition of the European enlightenment; instead they are bound to local frames of speaking from which they project world.