Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (17) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (17)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (17)
Institute
Since 1993 the southern shore of Lake Gülpe in western Brandenburg has been man-aged with Galloway cattle. This is supported by the so called "Vertragsnaturschutz" (i.e. contract nature conservation) in order to preserve the valuable, species-rich vegetation structure. This is an economically justifiable arrangement for the Galloway cattle-farmer. Permanent botanical plots were monitored in the area for four years. For most species, the observed changes in vegetation are considered as mere fluctuations on the basis of their known ecological requirements and data on hydrological dynamics during the study. Only a few species might indicate succession. A continuation of the present form of land management is recommended for the preservation of the current vegetation structure. However it is advisable to continue with monitoring of the vegetation in order to confirm the results over larger timescales. Until then the management with Galloway cattle is to acclaim as a proper treatment to preserve the southern shore of Lake Gülpe.
Since 1992 the southern shore of the Lake Gülpe in western Brandenburg is managed with Galloway cattle to preserve species, vegetation and landscape pattern. This paper presents the vegetation zones which are influenced by the water balance being the most significant and dynamic location factor in the area. Following the plots from dry to wet sites the most important plant communities are: Diantho-Armerietum, Arrhenatheretalia-Gesellschaft (-community), Leonotodon saxatilis -Potentilla anserina-community, Caricetum gracilis as well as Glycerietum aquaticae and Cypero- Samoletum. 23 endangered species were found.
Rivers form the most important natural corridors through the landscape. Certain plant species grow mainly or exclusively in these corridors as it has been observed for about 150 years in Central European lowlands. However, these species do not form a homogenous group in terms of biogeography, site requirements, life form, or any other feature this distribution pattern. Accordingly, first, we give a review of the various hypotheses which have been proposed to explain the river corridor distribution pattern. This includes (1) river corridors acting as routes of migration or invasion, (2) floodplain-specific disturbance providing open sites, (3) temporary anoxic conditions during floods, (4) deviating meso-climatic conditions, (5) specific substrate and nutrient supply, and (6) water supply. In particular, the above hypotheses (2-5) imply that river corridor plants may be well-adapted to specific stress and regeneration conditions in floodplains while other species may be not. This may lead to reduced competition in river corridors. We suggest this mechanism to constitute actual benefits for river corridor plants. Secondly, we present a simple model of multi-species population dynamics to show, that our competition-related framework is, in principle, able to explain river corridor plant species distribution patterns. As, however, none of the above hypotheses (1-6) have been tested experimentally we thirdly present a currently running experimental study on the river corridor plant Juncus atratus (black rush) in north- eastern Germany. We emphasize that much more experimental evidence must be gained on population ecology and meta- population dynamics to understand the distribution patterns of river corridor plants.
In a selected literature survey we reviewed studies on the habitat heterogeneity-animal species diversity relationship and evaluated whether there are uncertainties and biases in its empirical support. We reviewed 85 publications for the period 1960-2003. We screened each publication for terms that were used to define habitat heterogeneity, the animal species group and ecosystem studied, the definition of the structural variable, the measurement of vegetation structure and the temporal and spatial scale of the study. The majority of studies found a positive correlation between habitat heterogeneity/diversity and animal species diversity. However, empirical support for this relationship is drastically biased towards studies of vertebrates and habitats under anthropogenic influence. In this paper we show that ecological effects of habitat heterogeneity may vary considerably between species groups depending on whether structural attributes are perceived as heterogeneity or fragmentation. Possible effects may also vary relative to the structural variable measured. Based upon this, we introduce a classification framework that may be used for across-studies comparisons. Moreover, the effect of habitat heterogeneity for one species group may differ in relation to the spatial scale. In several studies, however, different species groups are closely linked to 'keystone structures' that determine animal species diversity by their presence. Detecting crucial keystone structures of the vegetation has profound implications for nature conservation and biodiversity management.