Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (13)
Document Type
- Article (13)
Language
- English (13)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (13)
Keywords
- Nitrogen (4)
- Biodiversity exploratories (3)
- Phosphorus (3)
- Fertilization (2)
- fertilization (2)
- land use (2)
- mowing (2)
- phosphorus (2)
- Agri-environmental schemes (1)
- Agro-ecosystems (1)
- Biodiversity Exploratories (1)
- Biodiversity Exploratories project (1)
- Biodiversity indicators (1)
- Biodiversity-ecosystem functioning (1)
- Biomass nutrient concentrations (1)
- Cover-weighting (1)
- Fodder quality (1)
- Grassland management (1)
- Grazing (1)
- Land use (1)
- Land-use impacts (1)
- Land-use intensity (1)
- Livestock density (1)
- Meadows (1)
- Mowing (1)
- Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) (1)
- Nutrient availability (1)
- Nutrient concentrations (1)
- Nutrient limitation (1)
- Organic farming (1)
- Pastures (1)
- Productivity (1)
- Species richness (1)
- agricultural grasslands (1)
- annuals (1)
- anthropogenic effect (1)
- biodiversity (1)
- biodiversity exploratories (1)
- biodiversity loss (1)
- bryophytes (1)
- colonization (1)
- correlation (1)
- determinants of plant community diversity and structure (1)
- ecosystem functioning (1)
- ecosystem services (1)
- fen grasslands (1)
- functional plant group (1)
- generalizability (1)
- global change (1)
- grassland management (1)
- grazing (1)
- intermediate disturbance hypothesis (1)
- land-use change (1)
- land-use history (1)
- land-use intensity (1)
- leaf economics (1)
- microsites (1)
- multidiversity (1)
- multifunctionality (1)
- multitrophic interactions (1)
- nitrogen (1)
- nutrient availability (1)
- nutrient ratios (1)
- plant functional traits (1)
- plant species richness (1)
- plant strategies (1)
- potassium (1)
- productivity (1)
- seed mass (1)
- species richness (1)
- structural equation modeling (1)
- structural equation modelling (1)
Institute
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (13) (remove)
Plant species richness of permanent grasslands has often been found to be significantly associated with productivity. Concentrations of nutrients in biomass can give further insight into these productivity-plant species richness relationships, e.g. by reflecting land use or soil characteristics. However, the consistency of such relationships across different regions has rarely been taken into account, which might significantly compromise our potential for generalization. We recorded plant species richness and measured above-ground biomass and concentrations of nutrients in biomass in 295 grasslands in three regions in Germany that differ in soil and climatic conditions. Structural equation modelling revealed that nutrient concentrations were mostly indirectly associated with plant species richness via biomass production. However, negative associations between the concentrations of different nutrients and biomass and plant species richness differed considerably among regions. While in two regions, more than 40% of the variation in plant species richness could be attributed to variation in biomass, K, P. and to some degree also N concentrations, in the third region only 15% of the variation could be explained in this way. Generally, highest plant species richness was recorded in grasslands where N and P were co-limiting plant growth, in contrast to N or K (co-) limitation. But again, this pattern was not recorded in the third region. While for two regions land-use intensity and especially the application of fertilizers are suggested to be the main drivers causing the observed negative associations with productivity, in the third region the little variance accounted for, low species richness and weak relationships implied that former intensive grassland management, ongoing mineralization of peat and fluctuating water levels in fen grasslands have overruled effects of current land-use intensity and productivity. Finally, we conclude that regional replication is of major importance for studies seeking general insights into productivity-diversity relationships.
Land use is increasingly recognized as a major driver of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in many current research projects. In grasslands, land use is often classified by categorical descriptors such as pastures versus meadows or fertilized versus unfertilized sites. However, to account for the quantitative variation of multiple land-use types in heterogeneous landscapes, a quantitative, continuous index of land-use intensity (LUI) is desirable. Here we define such a compound, additive LUI index for managed grasslands including meadows and pastures. The LUI index summarizes the standardized intensity of three components of land use, namely fertilization, mowing, and livestock grazing at each site. We examined the performance of the LUI index to predict selected response variables on up to 150 grassland sites in the Biodiversity Exploratories in three regions in Germany(Alb, Hainich, Schorlheide). We tested the average Ellenberg nitrogen indicator values of the plant community, nitrogen and phosphorus concentration in the aboveground plant biomass, plant-available phosphorus concentration in the top soil, and soil C/N ratio, and the first principle component of these five response variables.
The LUI index significantly predicted the principal component of all five response variables, as well as some of the individual responses. Moreover, vascular plant diversity decreased significantly with LUI in two regions (Alb and Hainich).
Inter-annual changes in management practice were pronounced from 2006 to 2008, particularly due to variation in grazing intensity. This rendered the selection of the appropriate reference year(s) an important decision for analyses of land-use effects, whereas details in the standardization of the index were of minor importance. We also tested several alternative calculations of a LUI index, but all are strongly linearly correlated to the proposed index.
The proposed LUI index reduces the complexity of agricultural practices to a single dimension and may serve as a baseline to test how different groups of organisms and processes respond to land use. In combination with more detailed analyses, this index may help to unravel whether and how land-use intensities, associated disturbance levels or other local or regional influences drive ecological processes.