Refine
Document Type
- Article (20)
- Part of a Book (3)
- Postprint (2)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (1)
Keywords
- Berühren (5)
- Liebe (3)
- Shakespeare (3)
- global warming (3)
- Berührung (2)
- Blumenberg (2)
- Eros (2)
- John Tyndall (2)
- Kugelmenschen (2)
- Philologie (2)
Institute
This article looks at Émile Zola’s novel cycle Les Rougon-Macquart and argues that it describes its subject, the Second Empire, as a warming climate tending toward climate catastrophe. Zola’s affinity to the notion of climate is shown to be linked to his poetic employment of the concept of ‘milieu’, inspired by Hippolyte Taine. Close readings of selected passages from the Rougon-Macquart are used to work out the climatic difference between ‘the old’ and ‘the new Paris’, and the process of warming that characterises the Second Empire. Octave Mouret’s department store holds a special place in the article, as it is analysed through what the article suggests calling a ‘meteorotopos’: a location of intensified climatic conditions that accounts for an increased interaction between human and non-human actors. The department store is also one of the many sites in the novel cycle that locally prefigure the ‘global’ climate catastrophe of Paris burning, in which the Second Empire perishes.
On 7 February 1861, John Tyndall, professor of natural philosophy, delivered a historical lecture: he could prove that different gases absorb heat to a very different degree, which implies that the temperate conditions provided for by the Earth's atmosphere are dependent on its particular composition of gases. The theoretical foundation of climate science was laid.
Ten years later, on the other side of the Channel, a young and ambitious author was working on a comprehensive literary analysis of the French era under the Second Empire. Émile Zola had probably not heard or read of Tyndall's discovery. However, the article makes the case for reading Zola's Rougon-Macquart as an extensive story of climate change. Zola's literary attempts to capture the defining characteristic of the Second Empire led him to the insight that its various milieus were all part of the same ‘climate’: that of an all-encompassing warming. Zola suggests that this climate is man-made: the economic success of the Second Empire is based on heating, in a literal and metaphorical sense, as well as on stoking the steam-engines and creating the hypertrophic atmosphere of the hothouse that enhances life and maximises turnover and profit. In contrast to Tyndall and his audience, Zola sensed the catastrophic consequences of this warming: the Second Empire was inevitably moving towards a final débâcle, i.e. it was doomed to perish in local and ‘global’ climate catastrophes.
The article foregrounds the supplementary status of Tyndall's physical and Zola's literary knowledge. As Zola's striking intuition demonstrates, literature appears to have a privileged approach to the phenomenon of man-induced climate change.
On 7 February 1861, John Tyndall, professor of natural philosophy, delivered a historical lecture: he could prove that different gases absorb heat to a very different degree, which implies that the temperate conditions provided for by the Earth's atmosphere are dependent on its particular composition of gases. The theoretical foundation of climate science was laid.
Ten years later, on the other side of the Channel, a young and ambitious author was working on a comprehensive literary analysis of the French era under the Second Empire. Émile Zola had probably not heard or read of Tyndall's discovery. However, the article makes the case for reading Zola's Rougon-Macquart as an extensive story of climate change. Zola's literary attempts to capture the defining characteristic of the Second Empire led him to the insight that its various milieus were all part of the same ‘climate’: that of an all-encompassing warming. Zola suggests that this climate is man-made: the economic success of the Second Empire is based on heating, in a literal and metaphorical sense, as well as on stoking the steam-engines and creating the hypertrophic atmosphere of the hothouse that enhances life and maximises turnover and profit. In contrast to Tyndall and his audience, Zola sensed the catastrophic consequences of this warming: the Second Empire was inevitably moving towards a final débâcle, i.e. it was doomed to perish in local and ‘global’ climate catastrophes.
The article foregrounds the supplementary status of Tyndall's physical and Zola's literary knowledge. As Zola's striking intuition demonstrates, literature appears to have a privileged approach to the phenomenon of man-induced climate change.
Was heißt Berühren Denken?
(2021)
Vorwort
(2021)
„Now is the winter of our discontent | Made glorious summer by this son of York“ – mit diesen Worten öffnet Shakespeares Richard III. Ein einziger Schau- spieler hat die Bühne betreten, beginnt zu reden und setzt so, alleine, das Stück in Gang – ein Novum für Shakespeare. Die frühneuzeitliche Bühne ist (fast) leer, die Zuschauer*innen hängen an den Lippen des Protagonisten, um durch seine Worte in die fiktive Welt des Dramas eingeführt zu werden.
Gleich mit dem ersten Wort versetzt Richard die Zuschauer*innen in eine andere Gegenwart: Fast wie eine hypnotische Anweisung konstituiert dieses „Now“ das Zeit-Raum-Gefüge der englischen Rosenkriege. Sich diesem thea- tralen „Now“ hinzugeben ist die Aufgabe der Zuschauer*innen. Sie sind auf- gerufen, „to forget (however briefly) everything they have experienced before. What matters is this ‚now‘, the hic et nunc of the theatre.“
Touching this dreaded sight
(2020)
Ausgehend von der in Shakespeare zweimal wiederkehrenden Phrase „Touching this dreaded sight“ widmet sich der Beitrag mithilfe ausgewählter Stellen aus Shakespeares Hamlet und The Tempest der Wirkkraft des frühneuzeitlichen Theaters. Er geht der Frage nach, wie Zuschauer*innen eines Stückes aus der Distanz be-troffen und ge-rührt werden. Um dem nachzudenken, wie diese Distanz zwischen dem Visuellen, dem Schauen im Theater, und dem Haptischen, der Berührung, überbrückt werden kann, helfen frühneuzeitliche Vorstellungen von theatraler Ansteckungskraft und Hans Blumenbergs Konzept menschlicher Betreffbarkeit.
The article is dedicated to the role of weather in Shakespeare’s tragedies. It traces a dense net of weather instances – stage weather, narrated weather events, weather imagery – throughout his plays, and attempts to reconstruct the weather’s structural implications for the tragedy genre. The way early modern humoral pathology understood the weather’s influence on the humours of the human body – of which Shakespeare’s plays themselves give evidence – provides the background for reconstructing the function of the weather as a source of tragic force. Its turbulence not only infects the characters in the play and thereby drives the plot, but also transgresses the boundaries of the fictional world and affects spectators in the auditorium.
Shakespeares Meteopoetik
(2021)
Shakespeare war zweifellos ›Meteopoet‹. Obwohl es die frühneuzeitliche Bühne, die ohne Kulisse, künstliches Licht und mit nur sehr beschränkten Requisiten auskam, vor allerhand Darstellungsprobleme stellen musste, bilden Wetterereignisse einen festen Bestandteil vieler seiner Dramen. Der über sechs Szenen andauernde Bühnensturm aus King Lear gehört zu den berühmtesten meteorologischen Momenten der westlichen Literatur. Schon in Julius Caesar, etwa sieben Jahre zuvor entstanden, leitet die Bühnenanweisung »Thunder and lightning« (JC 1.3; JC 2.2) ein sich über mehrere Auftritte erstreckendes Unwetter ein, das mit den damaligen Mitteln auf der Bühne inszeniert werden musste: Vermutlich kamen dabei in Holztrögen oder direkt auf dem die Bühne überspannenden Dachboden gerollte Kanonenkugeln und an Fäden geführte Feuerwerkskörper zum Einsatz, die Donner und Blitz simulierten. So auch in der Macbeth eröffnenden Hexenszene, zumindest lässt darauf die identische Bühnenanweisung schließen. Dass dieses Bühnenwetter hier nicht nur die übernatürliche Atmosphäre unterstützt, sondern tatsächlich auch meteorologisch relevant ist, verdeutlichen zwei Hinweise: Zum einen erfahren wir von Macbeth später selbst, dass er und seine Zeitgenossen den Hexen tatsächlich die Fähigkeit zuschrieben, das Wetter zu machen:
»Though you untie the winds, and let them fight / Against the churches« (Mac 4.1.52–53), ruft er den Hexen entgegen – es antworten drei Donnerschläge. Zum anderen berichten zwei Randfiguren von einem außergewöhnlichen Unwetter, das
just in der Nacht, in der Macbeth Duncan ermordet, gewütet hatte: »The night has been unruly: where we lay / The chimneys were blown down« (Mac 2.3.54–55), erzählt Lennox, eine Szene später ergänzt ein alter Mann, dass er zu seinen Lebzeiten keine vergleichbare »sore night« (Mac 2.4.3) gesehen habe. Wetterschilderungen vergleichbarer Art begegnen auch in Othello.