Refine
Document Type
- Article (11)
- Part of Periodical (6)
- Review (3)
- Part of a Book (2)
- Other (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (23)
Keywords
- 20. Jahrhundert (3)
- 20th century (3)
- USA (3)
- deutsch-jüdische Geschichte (3)
- moderne jüdische Geschichte (3)
- 19. Jahrhundert (2)
- 19th century (2)
- German Jewish history (2)
- Jewish Studies (2)
- Jüdische Studien (2)
- Modern Jewish history (2)
- United States (2)
- book history (2)
- modern Jewish history (2)
- transnationale Studien (2)
- American Jewish History (1)
- American history (1)
- Bibel (1)
- Bible (1)
- Buchgeschichte (1)
- East European Jewish History (1)
- European Jewish history (1)
- Familiengeschichte (1)
- Frühe Neuzeit (1)
- Galicia (1)
- Genealogie (1)
- Hebrew (1)
- Hebräisch (1)
- Israel (1)
- Jewish cultural history (1)
- Jewish historiography (1)
- Jiddisch (1)
- Kulturtransfer (1)
- Migration (1)
- Modern Jewish History (1)
- Moderne Jüdische Geschichte (1)
- Translations (1)
- Verlagsgeschichte (1)
- Yiddish (1)
- cultural history (1)
- cultural pluralism (1)
- cultural transfer (1)
- early modern history (1)
- education (1)
- family history (1)
- genealogy (1)
- historiography (1)
- history and memory (1)
- interfaith dialogue (1)
- jüdische Geschichtsschreibung (1)
- jüdische Kulturgeschichte (1)
- migration (1)
- modern Judaism (1)
- publishing (1)
- publishing history (1)
- rabbinical seminaries (1)
- transnational history (1)
- transnational studies (1)
- Übersetzungen (1)
Der Verleger, Kaufhausunternehmer und Mäzen Salman Schocken (1877– 1959)neigte nicht zu übertriebener Bescheidenheit. Als er 1945 in New York seinen amerikanischen Verlag ins Leben rief, kündigte er ihn mit folgenden Worten an:
Schocken ignorierte damit die Arbeit der zahlreichen bestehenden amerikanisch-jüdischen Verlagshäuser, da diese seiner Meinung nach nicht die Aufgabe erfüllten, die ihm vorschwebte: die Rückführung traditionsferner und damit in ihrer Identität unsicherer Juden durch Auseinandersetzung mit ihrem kulturellen Erbe. Dieses Ziel hatte bereits das Programm des Berliner Schocken Verlags (1931– 1938) bestimmt, der die vom Gründer genannten „repräsentative[n] Kostproben des Judentums“ veröffentlicht und damit zur „jüdischen Kulturrenaissance“ der 1930er Jahre beigetragen hatte.² Auch nach seiner Emigration nach Palästina 1934 blieb Schocken einer deutsch-jüdischen Wissenskultur zeitlebens verhaftet. Mit seiner verlegerischen Arbeit in den USA wollte Schocken das Programm seines Berliner Verlags für das amerikanische Nachkriegsjudentum neu auflegen, da sich dieses – seiner Meinung nach – in einer ähnlichen geistigen Situation befand wie das deutsche Judentum der Weimarer Republik. Entsprechend verkündete er 1945 in einer Rede in Jerusalem: „Sie wissen, dass ich jetzt daran arbeite, den Schockenverlag in Amerika zu machen. Das ist eine Imitation des deutschen Verlages. [...] Entfernungen existieren nicht mehr und Einfluss von hier nach dort und dort nach hier ist nicht mehr zu übersehen.“³ In diesen Aussagen klingen bereits verschiedene Schlüsselthemen der Rolle von Schocken Books New York an, dessen Geschichte bisher nur ansatzweise erforscht ist: Der Bezug auf Schockens Erfahrungen in Deutschland und das davon geprägte kulturpolitische Programm, das Kontinuitäten zwischen zwei räumlich und zeitlich fundamental getrennten jüdischen Gemeinschaften postulierte und auf einen transnationalen Kanon jüdischen Wissens zielte. Schocken wirkte mit seinen Verlagen, die er in Deutschland, Palästina/Israel und den USA gründete, nicht nur an drei Schlüsselorten der jüdischen Moderne. Sein Verlagsprogramm stand zudem im Kontext eines Schlüsselprozesses jüdischer Modernisierung: der Transformation traditionell-religiösen Wissens in posttraditionell-kulturelle Formen. Dieser Beitrag stellt anhand von Quellen aus dem Verlagsarchiv, der Nachlässe von Schockens Lektoren in den USA und der Rezeption von Schocken Books in den USA den Verlagsgründer Salman Schocken und die beiden Verlage in Berlin und New York vor. Im Zentrum der Analyse stehen die transnationale Verflechtung der Verlagshäuser und die Frage nach dem in den Publikationsprogrammen angestrebten transnationalen Kanon jüdischen Wissens in der Moderne.
From the 1940s well into the 1960s, a new sociocultural constellation let American Jews redefine their relationship to the religious tradition. This article analyzes the response of a religious elite of rabbis and intellectuals to this process, which was driven by various factors. Many American Jews were at least one generation away from traditional Judaism, which seemed out of place in postwar America. Liberal Judaism, with its narrow concept of religion, on the other hand, while fitting a larger social consensus, did not satiate many Jews' spiritual and identity needs. Sensing this deficit, rabbis and other religious thinkers explored broader concepts of Judaism. Religious journals that sprang up in the postwar decades served as vehicles for the attempt to understand Judaism in broader, cultural terms, while preserving a religious core. The article shows how in this search religious thinkers turned to the Eastern European past as a resource. As other groups similarly tried to mine this past for the sake of their present agendas, its reconstruction became a key process in the transformation of postwar American Judaism and its relationship to the tradition.
When he founded Schocken Books in 1945, department store magnate, philanthropist, and publisher Salman Schocken (1877–1959) called his new American publishing business an imitation of its German predecessor, which had functioned from 1931 until 1938. He intended it to replicate the success of the Berlin Schocken Verlag by spiritually fortifying a Jewish community uncertain in its identity. The new company reflected the transnational transfer of people, ideas, and texts between Germany, Palestine/Israel, and the United States. Its success and near-failure raise questions about transnationalism and American Jewish culture: Can a culture be imposed on a population which has its own organs and agencies of cultural production? Had American Jewish culture developed organically to the specific place where several million Jews found themselves and according to uniquely American cultural patterns? The answers suggest that the concepts of transnationalism and cultural transfer complement each other as tools to analyze American Jewry in its American and Jewish contexts.
Foreign Entanglements
(2021)
The field of American Jewish studies has recently trained its focus on the transnational dimensions of its subject, reflecting in more sustained ways than before about the theories and methods of this approach. Yet, much of the insight to be gained from seeing American Jewry as constitutively entangled in many ways with other Jewries has not yet been realized. Transnational American Jewish studies are still in their infancy.
This issue of PaRDeS presents current research on the multiple entanglements of American with Central European, especially German-speaking Jewries in the 19th and 20th centuries. The articles reflect the wide range of topics that can benefit from a transnational understanding of the American Jewish experience as shaped by its foreign entanglements.
In recent years, “transnationalism” has become a key concept for historians and other scholars in the humanities and social sciences. However, its overuse threatens to dilute what would otherwise be a distinct approach with promising heuristic potential. This danger seems especially pronounced when the notion of transnationalism is applied to Jewish history, which, paradoxically, most scholars would agree, is at its core transnational. Many studies have analyzed how Jewries in different times and places, from the biblical era to the present, have been shaped by people, ideas, texts, and institutions that migrated across state lines and between cultures. So what is new about transnationalism in Jewish Studies? What new insights does it offer?
American Jewry offers an obvious arena to test transnationalism’s significance as an approach to historical research within Jewish studies. As a “nation of nations,” the United States is made up of a distinct and unique society, built on ideas of diversity and pluralism, and transcending old European concepts of nation and state. The transformative incorporation in American life of cultural, political, and social traditions brought from abroad is one feature of this distinctiveness. American Jewish history and culture, in particular, are best understood in the context of interaction with Jews in other places, both because of American Jews’ roots in and continued entanglement with Europe, and because of their differences from other Jews.
These considerations guided the participants in a roundtable that formed a prologue to an international conference held July 20–22, 2016, at the School of Jewish Theology at the University of Potsdam and the Center for Jewish Studies Berlin-Brandenburg, Germany. The conference title, “Re-Framing American Jewish History and Thought: New Transnational Perspectives,” indicated the organizers’ conviction that the transnational approach does have the potential to shed fresh light on the American Jewish experience. The participants were asked to bring their experiences to the table, in an effort to clarify what transnationalism might mean for American Jewish Studies, and where it might yield new approaches and insights.
The conference brought together some thirty scholars of various disciplines from Europe, Israel, and the United States. In addition to exploring a relatively new approach (at least, in the field of American Jewish Studies), the conference also served a second purpose: to further the interest in American Jewry as a subject of scholarly attention in countries outside the U.S., where the topic has been curiously neglected. The assumption underlying the conference was that a transnational perspective on American Jewry would bring to bear the particular interests and skills of scholars working outside the American academy, and thereby complement, rather than replicate, the ways American Jewish Studies have been pursued in North America itself.