Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (2)
Year of publication
- 2020 (2) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (2) (remove)
Language
- English (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (2)
Keywords
- Migration (2) (remove)
One of the tremendous discoveries by the Cassini spacecraft has been the detection of propeller structures in Saturn's A ring. Although the generating moonlet is too small to be resolved by the cameras aboard Cassini, its produced density structure within the rings, caused by its gravity can be well observed. The largest observed propeller is called Blériot and has an azimuthal extent over several thousand kilometers. Thanks to its large size, Blériot could be identified in different images over a time span of over 10 years, allowing the reconstruction of its orbital evolution. It turns out that Blériot deviates considerably from its expected Keplerian orbit in azimuthal direction by several thousand kilometers. This excess motion can be well reconstructed by a superposition of three harmonics, and therefore resembles the typical fingerprint of a resonantly perturbed body. This PhD thesis is directed to the excess motion of Blériot. Resonant perturbations are a known for some of the outer satellites of Saturn. Thus, in the first part of this thesis, we seek for suiting resonance candidates nearby the propeller, which might explain the observed periods and amplitudes. In numeric simulations, we show that indeed resonances by Prometheus, Pandora and Mimas can explain the libration periods in good agreement, but not the amplitudes. The amplitude problem is solved by the introduction of a propeller-moonlet interaction model, where we assume a broken symmetry of the propeller by a small displacement of the moonlet. This results in a librating motion the moonlet around the propeller's symmetry center due to the non-vanishing accelerations. The retardation of the reaction of the propeller structure to the motion of the moonlet causes the propeller to become asymmetric. Hydrodynamic simulations to test our analytical model confirm our predictions. In the second part of this thesis, we consider a stochastic migration of the moonlet, which is an alternative hypothesis to explain the observed excess motion of Blériot. The mean-longitude is a time-integrated quantity and thus introduces a correlation between the independent kicks of a random walk, smoothing the noise and thus makes the residual look similar to the observed one for Blériot. We apply a diagonalization test to decorrelated the observed residuals for the propellers Blériot and Earhart and the ring-moon Daphnis. It turns out that the decorrelated distributions do not strictly follow the expected Gaussian distribution. The decorrelation method fails to distinguish a correlated random walk from a noisy libration and thus we provide an alternative study. Assuming the three-harmonic fit to be a valid representation of the excess motion for Blériot, independently from its origin, we test the likelihood that this excess motion can be created by a random walk. It turns out that a non-correlated and correlated random walk is unlikely to explain the observed excess motion.
Organizing immigration
(2020)
Immigration constitutes a dynamic policy field with – often quite unpredictable – dynamics. This is based on immigration constituting a ‘wicked problem’ meaning that it is characterized by uncertainty, ambiguity and complexity. Due to the dynamics in the policy field, expectations towards public administrations often change. Following neo-institutionalist theory, public administrations depend on meeting the expectations in the organizational field in order to maintain legitimacy as the basis for, e.g., resources and compliance of stakeholders. With the dynamics in the policy field, expectations might change and public administrations consequently need to adapt in order to maintain or repair the then threatened legitimacy. If their organizational legitimacy is threatened by a perception of structures and processes being inadequate for changed expectations, an ‘institutional crisis’ unfolds. However, we know little about ministerial bureaucracies’ structural reactions to such crucial momentums and how this effects the quest for coordination within policy-making. Overall, the dissertation thus links to both policy analysis and public administration research and consists of five publications. It asks: How do structures in ministerial bureaucracies change in the context of institutional crises? And what effect do these changes have on ministerial coordination? The dissertation hereby focusses on the above described dynamic policy field of immigration in Germany in the period from 2005 to 2017 and pursues three objectives: 1) to identify the context and impulse for changes in the structures of ministerial bureaucracies, 2) to describe respective changes with regard to their organizational structures, and 3) to identify their effect on coordination. It hereby compares and contrasts institutional crises by incremental change and shock as well as changes and effects at federal and Länder level which allows a comprehensive answer to both of the research questions. Theoretically, the dissertation follows neo-institutionalist theory with a particular focus on changes in organizational structures, coordination and crisis management. Methodologically, it follows a comparative design. Each article (except for the literature review), focusses on ministerial bureaucracies at one governmental level (federal or Länder) and on an institutional crisis induced by either an incremental process or a shock. Thus, responses and effects can be compared and contrasted across impulses for institutional crises and governmental levels. Overall, the dissertation follows a mixed methods approach with a majority of qualitative single and small-n case studies based on document analysis and semi-structured interviews. Additionally, two articles use quantitative methods as they best suited the respective research question. The rather explorative nature of these two articles however fits to the overall interpretivist approach of the dissertation. Overall, the dissertation’s core argument is: Within the investigation period, varying dynamics and thus impulses for institutional crises took place in the German policy field of immigration. Respectively, expectations by stakeholders on how the politico-administrative system should address the policy problem changed. Ministerial administrations at both the federal and Länder level adapted to these expectations in order to maintain, or regain respectively, organizational legitimacy. The administration hereby referred to well-known recipes of structural changes. Institutional crises do not constitute fields of experimentation. The new structures had an immediate effect on ministerial coordination, with respect to both the horizontal and vertical dimension. Yet, they did not mean a comprehensive change of the system in place. The dissertation thus challenges the idea of the toppling effect of crises and rather shows that adaptability and persistence of public administrations constitute two sides of the same coin.