Refine
Year of publication
- 2020 (1710) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (1710) (remove)
Keywords
- random point processes (18)
- statistical mechanics (18)
- stochastic analysis (18)
- climate change (17)
- machine learning (10)
- Germany (9)
- dynamics (9)
- model (9)
- Franconia (8)
- Franken (8)
Institute
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (177)
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (156)
- Institut für Geowissenschaften (140)
- Institut für Chemie (107)
- Historisches Institut (83)
- Institut für Mathematik (75)
- Department Psychologie (73)
- Institut für Umweltwissenschaften und Geographie (63)
- Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften (59)
- Department Linguistik (58)
The German writer Wilhelm Marr is known as the father of modern antisemitism. Little attention has been paid to the fact that Marr did not coin the term “antisemitism” in his influential pamphlet Der Sieg des Judenthums über das Germanenthum published in March 1879. The neologism first appeared in the name and programme of the “Antisemiten-Liga” which came to existence in September 1879. Even less attention has been paid to the fact that it was not Marr, but the Berlin chemist and engineer Hector de Grousilliers who was the initiator of this political organisation. Although Marr attended the founding meeting and joined it as a member, he played no active role in it. Grousilliers, paradoxically, first had the idea of founding a “Lessing-Verein”, before his “Antisemiten-Liga” came into being in an absurd volte-face. Carrying out a bizarre revaluation of Lessing’s Ring Parable, Grousilliers attributed antisemitic semantics to the concept of tolerance. He delivered several speeches on tolerance in the “League” before turning his attention to the publication of the antisemitic humorous-satirical magazine Die Wahrheit. Humoristisch-satirisches Wochenblatt.
Mit der bevorstehenden Entscheidung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts in der Sache Pechstein neigt sich eine scheinbar endlose Geschichte dem Ende entgegen. Es bleibt zu hoffen, dass auf die Frage der (un-)zulässigen Inanspruchnahme verfahrensgestaltender Marktmacht schlussendlich eine überzeugende Antwort gefunden wird, die bestehende Defizite benennt, die schutzwürdigen Athletenrechte stärkt und den Anstoß für eine sach- und interessengerechte Strukturreform in der Sportschiedsgerichtsbarkeit gibt.
Vorwort
(2020)
Vorwort
(2020)