Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (897) (remove)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Other (897) (remove)
Language
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (897) (remove)
Keywords
- E-Learning (4)
- MOOC (4)
- Scrum (4)
- embodied cognition (4)
- errata, addenda (4)
- Cloud-Security (3)
- Digitalisierung (3)
- ISM: supernova remnants (3)
- Industry 4.0 (3)
- Internet of Things (3)
Institute
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (96)
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (84)
- Hasso-Plattner-Institut für Digital Engineering GmbH (83)
- Institut für Geowissenschaften (63)
- Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften (48)
- Department Psychologie (46)
- Institut für Mathematik (46)
- Hasso-Plattner-Institut für Digital Engineering gGmbH (31)
- Institut für Ernährungswissenschaft (31)
- Institut für Chemie (30)
P>Despite ample research, understanding plant spread and predicting their ability to track projected climate changes remain a formidable challenge to be confronted. We modelled the spread of North American wind-dispersed trees in current and future (c. 2060) conditions, accounting for variation in 10 key dispersal, demographic and environmental factors affecting population spread. Predicted spread rates vary substantially among 12 study species, primarily due to inter-specific variation in maturation age, fecundity and seed terminal velocity. Future spread is predicted to be faster if atmospheric CO2 enrichment would increase fecundity and advance maturation, irrespective of the projected changes in mean surface windspeed. Yet, for only a few species, predicted wind-driven spread will match future climate changes, conditioned on seed abscission occurring only in strong winds and environmental conditions favouring high survival of the farthest-dispersed seeds. Because such conditions are unlikely, North American wind-dispersed trees are expected to lag behind the projected climate range shift.
Data limitations can lead to unrealistic fits of predictive species distribution models (SDMs) and spurious extrapolation to novel environments. Here, we want to draw attention to novel combinations of environmental predictors that are within the sampled range of individual predictors but are nevertheless outside the sample space. These tend to be overlooked when visualizing model behaviour. They may be a cause of differing model transferability and environmental change predictions between methods, a problem described in some studies but generally not well understood. We here use a simple simulated data example to illustrate the problem and provide new and complementary visualization techniques to explore model behaviour and predictions to novel environments. We then apply these in a more complex real-world example. Our results underscore the necessity of scrutinizing model fits, ecological theory and environmental novelty.