Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (156)
- Postprint (14)
- Conference Proceeding (4)
- Review (3)
- Other (2)
- Part of a Book (1)
Keywords
- Individual-based model (5)
- Individual-based models (5)
- climate change (5)
- plant functional trait (5)
- Climate change (4)
- Non-target terrestrial plants (3)
- Plant community model (3)
- Plant functional types (3)
- biodiversity (3)
- functional traits (3)
- hoverflies (3)
- intraspecific trait variation (3)
- landscape homogenization (3)
- syrphids (3)
- wild bees (3)
- Beneficial mutations (2)
- Biodiversity (2)
- Coexistence (2)
- Community-level effects (2)
- Directional climate change (2)
- Dry land degradation (2)
- Dynamic vegetation models (2)
- East Africa (2)
- Evolution (2)
- Fire (2)
- Fragmentation (2)
- Functional types (2)
- Habitat fragmentation (2)
- Herbicide risk assessment (2)
- IBM (2)
- Individual-based modeling (2)
- LMA (2)
- Landscape of fear (2)
- Limiting similarity (2)
- Mutation rate (2)
- Mutator locus (2)
- Plant height (2)
- Predator-prey interactions (2)
- Rangeland management (2)
- Recombination (2)
- Simulation model (2)
- agricultural landscape (2)
- behavioral plasticity (2)
- buffer zones (2)
- coexistence (2)
- community model (2)
- community theory (2)
- concepts (2)
- coviability analysis (2)
- demographic noise (2)
- developmental canalization (2)
- ecosystem services provisioning (2)
- ecosystems (2)
- environmental change (2)
- environmental noise (2)
- genetic accommodation (2)
- heterogeneity (2)
- individual-based modeling (2)
- limits (2)
- macroecology (2)
- management (2)
- many-to-one genotype–phenotype map (2)
- modern coexistence theory (2)
- niche width (2)
- noise color (2)
- phenotypic plasticity (2)
- population viability analysis (2)
- reaction norms (2)
- resilience (2)
- scale-dependence (2)
- scale-dependency (2)
- sexual species (2)
- shrub encroachment (2)
- solitary bees (2)
- spatially explicit (2)
- species abundance (2)
- stochastic fluctuations (2)
- trait-environment relationship (2)
- (Semi-natural) Grasslands (1)
- 3D-acceleration sensor (1)
- Abandonment (1)
- Above-/below-ground interactions (1)
- Acacia mellifera (1)
- Active movement (1)
- Adaptation options (1)
- Agricultural landscapes (1)
- Agriotes Ustulatus (1)
- Allometry (1)
- Anthropogenic biome (1)
- Aridity gradient (1)
- Baltic Sea (1)
- Bayesian statistics (1)
- Below-ground resources (1)
- Belowground herbivory (1)
- Bet-hedging germination (1)
- Biodiversity Exploratories (1)
- Biodiversity experiments (1)
- Biodiversity theory (1)
- Biological conservation (1)
- Biome (1)
- Biome shifts (1)
- Biomization (1)
- Birds (1)
- Body size (1)
- Boosted regression tree (1)
- Brachypodium hybridum (1)
- Bromus hordeaceus (1)
- Bush encroachment (1)
- CART (1)
- CFR Proteaceae (1)
- CO2 increase (1)
- Ciconia ciconia (1)
- Clonal plants (1)
- Co-existence (1)
- Coexistence mechanisms (1)
- Community (1)
- Community assembly (1)
- Competition-colonization (1)
- Competitive hierarchies (1)
- Connectivity (1)
- Conservation biogeography (1)
- Conservation management (1)
- Decision-making (1)
- Density dependence (1)
- Diabrotica Virgifera Virgifera (1)
- Diversity (1)
- Dormancy (1)
- Drought stress (1)
- Drought-stress (1)
- Dynamic landscapes (1)
- Eco-evolutionary dynamics (1)
- Ecohydrological modeling (1)
- Ecological classification (1)
- Ecological health (1)
- Ecological risk assessment (1)
- Ecology (1)
- Ecosystem functions and services (1)
- Ecotoxicology (1)
- Effect group (1)
- Emergence time (1)
- Environmental filtering (1)
- Environmental heterogeneity (1)
- Environmental relationships (1)
- Eurasian Dry Grassland Group (EDGG) (1)
- European Vegetation Archive (EVA) (1)
- Eutrophication (1)
- Fauna (1)
- Field margins (1)
- Filamentous fungi (1)
- Flora (1)
- Foraging (1)
- Foraging movement (1)
- Forecasting (1)
- Forest change (1)
- Fractal landscapes (1)
- Functional ecology (1)
- Functional trait (1)
- Functional traits (1)
- Functional type (1)
- Fungal foraging (1)
- Fungal highways (1)
- Fungal space searching algorithms (1)
- Global change (1)
- GrassPlot (1)
- Grassland (1)
- Grazing (1)
- Greenhouse experiment (1)
- Guild (1)
- Habitat filtering (1)
- Habitat gradients (1)
- Habitat heterogeneity (1)
- Habitat loss (1)
- Habitat management (1)
- Herbicide (1)
- Herbicide exposure (1)
- Heterogeneity species diversity relationship (1)
- Hierarchical partitioning of variance (1)
- Holocene (1)
- Home range (1)
- Hyperspectral remote sensing (1)
- IBC-grass model (1)
- Indicators (1)
- Individual based simulation model (1)
- Interdisciplinarity (1)
- Interference competition (1)
- Intermediate disturbance hypothesis (1)
- Kettle holes (1)
- Kriging (1)
- Land reform (1)
- Land use intensity (1)
- Land-use intensity (1)
- Landscape (1)
- Larix gmelinii (1)
- Last glacial maximum (1)
- Late Cenozoic (1)
- Leaf area index (1)
- Local adaptation (1)
- Locomotion costs (1)
- Lolium perenne (1)
- Long-distance seed dispersal (1)
- Matrix vegetation (1)
- Metapopulation dynamics (1)
- Microbial community (1)
- Mid-Holocene (1)
- Middle East (1)
- Military areas (1)
- Military conversion (1)
- Modeling (1)
- Modular organisms (1)
- Monitoring programmes (1)
- Multi-grain sampling (1)
- Natura 2000 (1)
- Natura 2000 monitoring (1)
- Nature conservation management (1)
- Nontarget terrestrial plants (1)
- Null models (1)
- ODD model description (1)
- ODD protocol (1)
- ODE model (1)
- PSI (plastic sphere of influence) (1)
- Palaeovegetation (1)
- Permafrost ecosystem (1)
- Phenotypic plasticity (1)
- Plant community (1)
- Plant community modelling (1)
- Plant diversity (1)
- Plant functional trait (1)
- Plant functional traits (1)
- Plant reproduction (1)
- Pollen dataset (1)
- Rainfall gradient (1)
- Rainfall variability (1)
- Regression tree analysis (1)
- Resistance (1)
- Response group (1)
- Riskspreading (1)
- Role-play (1)
- SLA (1)
- Savanna-grassland bistability (1)
- Scale-dependence (1)
- Scirpus maritimus (1)
- Seed competition (1)
- Seed dispersal by wind (1)
- Seed immigration (1)
- Seed mass (1)
- Seed number (1)
- Semi-arid savanna (1)
- Shrub encroachment (1)
- Simulation experiment (1)
- Slime molds (1)
- Slope exposure (1)
- Southern Africa (1)
- Spatially explicit model (1)
- Spatially explicit modelling (1)
- Species co-existence (1)
- Species coexistence (1)
- Species conservation (1)
- Species density (1)
- Species endangerment (1)
- Species frequency (1)
- Specific leaf area (SLA) (1)
- Stochastic differential equations (1)
- Temporal spread (1)
- Time-lag effects (1)
- Trait selection (1)
- Trait-based approach (1)
- Trait-environment relationship (1)
- Uniform sampling (1)
- Vegetation continuum (1)
- Vulnerability (1)
- Wireworms (1)
- adaptation of conservation strategies (1)
- adaptive management (1)
- alpine grassland degradation (1)
- animal movement (1)
- arable land (1)
- asymmetry of competition (1)
- atlas data (1)
- attraction-avoidance (1)
- biodiversity conservation (1)
- biodiversity refugia (1)
- biogeography (1)
- biotelemetry (1)
- butterflies (1)
- citizen science programme (1)
- closed forest (1)
- community assembly (1)
- community dynamics (1)
- competition (1)
- competition intensity (1)
- competition resistance trade-off (1)
- conservation biology (1)
- conservation planning (1)
- conservation targets (1)
- count data (1)
- demographic bottleneck (1)
- demographic properties (1)
- dendroecology (1)
- density dependence (1)
- ecohydrology (1)
- european flora (1)
- experimental plant communities (1)
- extinction debt (1)
- fine-scale interactions (1)
- fire frequency (1)
- flight (1)
- flight efficiency (1)
- forest change (1)
- functional types (1)
- grassland diversity (1)
- grassland vegetation (1)
- grid-based simulation model (1)
- habitat fragmentation (1)
- habitat islands (1)
- habitat loss (1)
- herd composition (1)
- hierarchical framework (1)
- home range selection (1)
- hybrid model (1)
- hyper spectral (1)
- importance (1)
- individual based modeling (1)
- individual variability (1)
- individual-based model (1)
- intensity vs (1)
- inter-specific interactions (1)
- intermediate disturbance hypothesis (1)
- interval squeeze (1)
- island biogeography theory (1)
- island ecology (1)
- isolation (1)
- juvenile mortality (1)
- kernel density estimation (1)
- land-use intensity (1)
- landscape genetics (1)
- latitude (1)
- life history (1)
- livestock (1)
- local abundances (1)
- local convex hull (1)
- long distance movement (1)
- long-term data (1)
- mediterranean-type ecosystem (1)
- migration (1)
- minimum convex polygon (1)
- mobile links (1)
- model (1)
- model coupling (1)
- morphological plasticity (1)
- movement behaviour (1)
- multi-taxon (1)
- nested plot (1)
- nutrient analogues (1)
- occurrence estimates (1)
- pace-of-life syndrome (1)
- personality (1)
- plant communities (1)
- plant density (1)
- plant-plant interactions (1)
- pollination (1)
- population-dynamics (1)
- precipitation pattern (1)
- process-based range models (1)
- process-based simulation model (1)
- range distribution (1)
- range filling (1)
- range size (1)
- rangeland management (1)
- recruitment (1)
- remote sensing (1)
- resource selection (1)
- root and shoot competition (1)
- sPlot (1)
- savanna (1)
- savanna resilience (1)
- shrubline (1)
- simulation model (1)
- size dependent mortality (1)
- size distribution (1)
- social environment (1)
- soil moisture (1)
- space use (1)
- spatial-distribution (1)
- spatially explicit model (1)
- species assemblies (1)
- species coexistence (1)
- species density (1)
- species distribution models (1)
- species-area relationship (1)
- species-area relationship (SAR) (1)
- state-space model (1)
- step-selection function (1)
- stocking capacity (1)
- sustainable rangeland management (1)
- telemetry (1)
- threats to biological diversity (1)
- topography (1)
- tracking data (1)
- trait (1)
- transient dynamics (1)
- tree death (1)
- tundra (1)
- variation (1)
- vegetation model (1)
- vegetation-plot database (1)
- white stork (1)
- wireworms coloptera (1)
- zone-of-influence model (1)
Institute
- Institut für Biochemie und Biologie (153)
- Institut für Geowissenschaften (14)
- Extern (6)
- Institut für Umweltwissenschaften und Geographie (5)
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Musterdynamik und Angewandte Fernerkundung (3)
- Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät (3)
- Institut für Physik und Astronomie (2)
- Referat für Presse- und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit (2)
- Zentrum für Umweltwissenschaften (2)
- Institut für Chemie (1)
Progressive habitat fragmentation threatens plant species with narrow habitat requirements. While local environmental conditions define population growth rates and recruitment success at the patch level, dispersal is critical for population viability at the landscape scale. Identifying the dynamics of plant meta-populations is often confounded by the uncertainty about soil-stored population compartments. We combined a landscape-scale assessment of an amphibious plant's population structure with measurements of dispersal complexity in time to track dispersal and putative shifts in functional connectivity. Using 13 microsatellite markers, we analyzed the genetic structure of extant Oenanthe aquatica populations and their soil seed banks in a kettle hole system to uncover hidden connectivity among populations in time and space. Considerable spatial genetic structure and isolation-by-distance suggest limited gene flow between sites. Spatial isolation and patch size showed minor effects on genetic diversity. Genetic similarity found among extant populations and their seed banks suggests increased local recruitment, despite some evidence of migration and recent colonization. Results indicate stepping-stone dispersal across adjacent populations. Among permanent and ephemeral demes the resulting meta-population demography could be determined by source-sink dynamics. Overall, these spatiotemporal connectivity patterns support mainland-island dynamics in our system, highlighting the importance of persistent seed banks as enduring sources of genetic diversity.
Climate change projections predict that Mediterranean-type ecosystems (MTEs) are becoming hotter and drier and that fires will become more frequent and severe.
While most plant species in these important biodiversity hotspots are adapted to hot, dry summers and recurrent fire, the Interval Squeeze framework suggests that reduced seed production (demographic shift), reduced seedling establishment after fire (post fire recruitment shift), and reduction in the time between successive fires (fire interval shift) will threaten fire killed species under climate change.
One additional potential driver of accelerated species decline, however, has not been considered so far: the decrease in pollination success observed in many ecosystems worldwide has the potential to further reduce seed accumulation and thus population persistence also in these already threatened systems.
Using the well-studied fire-killed and serotinous shrub species Banksia hookeriana as an example, we apply a new spatially implicit population simulation model to explore population dynamics under past (1988-2002) and current (2003-2017) climate conditions, deterministic and stochastic fire regimes, and alternative scenarios of pollination decline.
Overall, model results suggest that while B. hookeriana populations were stable under past climate conditions, they will not continue to persist under current (and prospective future) climate.
Negative effects of climatic changes and more frequent fires are reinforced by the measured decline in seed set leading to further reduction in the mean persistence time by 12-17%.
These findings clearly indicate that declining pollination rates can be a critical factor that increases further the pressure on the persistence of fire-killed plants.
Future research needs to investigate whether other fire-killed species are similarly threatened, and if local population extinction may be compensated by recolonization events, facilitating persistence in spatially structured meta-communities.
Seed dispersal plays an important role in population dynamics in agricultural ecosystems, but the effects of surrounding vegetation height on seed dispersal and population connectivity on the landscape scale have rarely been studied. Understanding the effects of surrounding vegetation height on seed dispersal will provide important information for land-use management in agricultural landscapes to prevent the spread of undesired weeds or enhance functional connectivity. We used two model species, Phragmites australis and Typha latifolia, growing in small natural ponds known as kettle holes, in an agricultural landscape to evaluate the effects of surrounding vegetation height on wind dispersal and population connectivity between kettle holes. Seed dispersal distance and the probability of long-distance dispersal (LDD) were simulated with the mechanistic WALD model under three scenarios of "low", "dynamic" and "high" surrounding vegetation height. Connectivity between the origin and target kettle holes was quantified with a connectivity index adapted from Hanski and Thomas (1994). Our results show that mean seed dispersal distance decreases with the height of surrounding matrix vegetation, but the probability of long-distance dispersal (LDD) increases with vegetation height. This indicates an important vegetation-based trade-off between mean dispersal distance and LDD, which has an impact on connectivity. Matrix vegetation height has a negative effect on mean seed dispersal distance but a positive effect on the probability of LDD. This positive effect and its impact on connectivity provide novel insights into landscape level (meta-)population and community dynamics - a change in matrix vegetation height by land-use or climatic changes could strongly affect the spread and connectivity of wind-dispersed plants. The opposite effect of vegetation height on mean seed dispersal distance and the probability of LDD should therefore be considered in management and analyses of future land-use and climate change effects.
The pace-of-life syndrome (POLS) hypothesis posits that suites of traits are correlated along a slow-fast continuum owing to life history trade-offs. Despite widespread adoption, environmental conditions driving the emergence of POLS remain unclear. A recently proposed conceptual framework of POLS suggests that a slow-fast continuum should align to fluctuations in density-dependent selection. We tested three key predictions made by this framework with an ecoevolutionary agent-based population model. Selection acted on responsiveness (behavioral trait) to interpatch resource differences and the reproductive investment threshold (life history trait). Across environments with density fluctuations of different magnitudes, we observed the emergence of a common axis of trait covariation between and within populations (i.e., the evolution of a POLS). Slow-type (fast-type) populations with high (low) responsiveness and low (high) reproductive investment threshold were selected at high (low) population densities and less (more) intense and frequent density fluctuations. In support of the predictions, fast-type populations contained a higher degree of variation in traits and were associated with higher intrinsic reproductive rate (r(0)) and higher sensitivity to intraspecific competition (gamma), pointing to a universal trade-off. While our findings support that POLS aligns with density-dependent selection, we discuss possible mechanisms that may lead to alternative evolutionary pathways.
Resilience trinity
(2020)
Ensuring ecosystem resilience is an intuitive approach to safeguard the functioning of ecosystems and hence the future provisioning of ecosystem services (ES). However, resilience is a multi-faceted concept that is difficult to operationalize. Focusing on resilience mechanisms, such as diversity, network architectures or adaptive capacity, has recently been suggested as means to operationalize resilience. Still, the focus on mechanisms is not specific enough. We suggest a conceptual framework, resilience trinity, to facilitate management based on resilience mechanisms in three distinctive decision contexts and time-horizons: 1) reactive, when there is an imminent threat to ES resilience and a high pressure to act, 2) adjustive, when the threat is known in general but there is still time to adapt management and 3) provident, when time horizons are very long and the nature of the threats is uncertain, leading to a low willingness to act. Resilience has different interpretations and implications at these different time horizons, which also prevail in different disciplines. Social ecology, ecology and engineering are often implicitly focussing on provident, adjustive or reactive resilience, respectively, but these different notions of resilience and their corresponding social, ecological and economic tradeoffs need to be reconciled. Otherwise, we keep risking unintended consequences of reactive actions, or shying away from provident action because of uncertainties that cannot be reduced. The suggested trinity of time horizons and their decision contexts could help ensuring that longer-term management actions are not missed while urgent threats to ES are given priority.
Resilience trinity
(2020)
Ensuring ecosystem resilience is an intuitive approach to safeguard the functioning of ecosystems and hence the future provisioning of ecosystem services (ES). However, resilience is a multi-faceted concept that is difficult to operationalize. Focusing on resilience mechanisms, such as diversity, network architectures or adaptive capacity, has recently been suggested as means to operationalize resilience. Still, the focus on mechanisms is not specific enough. We suggest a conceptual framework, resilience trinity, to facilitate management based on resilience mechanisms in three distinctive decision contexts and time-horizons: 1) reactive, when there is an imminent threat to ES resilience and a high pressure to act, 2) adjustive, when the threat is known in general but there is still time to adapt management and 3) provident, when time horizons are very long and the nature of the threats is uncertain, leading to a low willingness to act. Resilience has different interpretations and implications at these different time horizons, which also prevail in different disciplines. Social ecology, ecology and engineering are often implicitly focussing on provident, adjustive or reactive resilience, respectively, but these different notions of resilience and their corresponding social, ecological and economic tradeoffs need to be reconciled. Otherwise, we keep risking unintended consequences of reactive actions, or shying away from provident action because of uncertainties that cannot be reduced. The suggested trinity of time horizons and their decision contexts could help ensuring that longer-term management actions are not missed while urgent threats to ES are given priority.
Editorial
(2020)
Portal Wissen = Excellence
(2023)
When something is not just good or very good, we often call it excellent. But what does that really mean? Coming from the Latin word “excellere,” it describes things, persons, or actions that are outstanding or superior and distinguish themselves from others. It cannot get any better. Excellence is the top choice for being the first or the best. Research is no exception.
At the university, you will find numerous exceptional researchers, outstanding projects, and, time and again, sensational findings, publications, and results. But is the University of Potsdam also excellent? A question that will certainly create a different stir in 2023 than it did perhaps 20 years ago. Since the launch of the Excellence Initiative in 2005, universities that succeed in winning the most comprehensive funding program for research in Germany have been considered – literally – excellent. Whether in the form of graduate schools, research clusters, or – since the program was continued in 2019 under the title “Excellence Strategy” – entire universities of excellence: Anyone who wants to be among the best research universities needs the seal of excellence.
The University of Potsdam is applying for funding with three cluster proposals in the recently launched new round of the “Excellence Strategy of the German Federal and State Governments.” One proposal comes from ecology and biodiversity research. The aim is to paint a comprehensive picture of ecological processes by examining the role of single individuals as well as the interactions among many species in an ecosystem to precisely determine the function of biodiversity. A second proposal has been submitted by the cognitive sciences. Here, the complex coexistence of language and cognition, development and learning, as well as motivation and behavior will be researched as a dynamic interrelation. The projects will include cooperation with the educational sciences to constantly consider linked learning and educational processes. The third proposal from the geo and environmental sciences concentrates on extreme and particularly devastating natural hazards and processes such as floods and droughts. The researchers examine these extreme events, focusing on their interaction with society, to be able to better assess the risks and damages they might involve and to initiate timely measures in the future.
“All three proposals highlight the excellence of our performance,” emphasizes University President Prof. Oliver Günther, Ph.D. “The outlines impressively document our commitment, existing research excellence, and the potential of the University of Potsdam as a whole. The fact that three powerful consortia have come together in different subject areas shows that we have taken a good step forward on our way to becoming one of the top German universities.”
In this issue, we are looking at what is in and behind these proposals: We talked to the researchers who wrote them. We asked them about their plans in case their proposals are successful and they bring a cluster of excellence to the university. But we also looked at the research that has led to the proposals, has long shaped the university’s profile, and earned it national and international recognition. We present a small selection of projects, methods, and researchers to illustrate why there really is excellent research in these proposals!
By the way, “excellence” is also not the end of the flagpole. After all, the adjective “excellent” even has a comparative and a superlative. With this in mind, I wish you the most excellent pleasure reading this issue!
Portal Wissen = Exzellenz
(2023)
Was nicht nur gut oder sehr gut ist, nennen wir gern exzellent. Aber was meint das eigentlich? Vom lateinischen „excellere“ kommend, beschreibt es Dinge, Personen oder Handlungen, die „hervor-“ oder „herausragen“ aus der Menge, sich „auszeichnen“ gegenüber anderen. Mehr geht nicht. Exzellenz ist das Mittel der Wahl, wenn es darum geht, der Erste oder Beste zu sein. Und das macht auch vor der Forschung nicht halt. Wer auf die Universität Potsdam schaut, findet zahlreiche ausgezeichnete Forschende, hervorragende Projekte und immer wieder auch aufsehenerregende Erkenntnisse, Veröffentlichungen und Ergebnisse.
Aber ist die UP auch exzellent? Eine Frage, die 2023 ganz sicher andere Wellen schlägt als vielleicht vor 20 Jahren. Denn seit dem Start der Exzellenzinitiative 2005 gelten als – wörtlich – exzellent jene Hochschulen, denen es gelingt, in dem umfangreichsten Förderprogramm für Wissenschaft in Deutschland einen Zuschlag zu erhalten. Egal ob in Form von Graduiertenschulen, Forschungsclustern oder – seit Fortsetzung des Programms ab 2019 unter dem Titel „Exzellenzstrategie“ – ganzen Exzellenzuniversitäten: Wer im Kreis der Forschungsuniversitäten zu den Besten gehören will, braucht das Siegel der Exzellenz. In der gerade eingeläuteten neuen Wettbewerbsrunde der „Exzellenzstrategie des Bundes und der Länder“ bewirbt sich die Universität Potsdam mit drei Clusterskizzen um Förderung.
Ein Antrag kommt aus der Ökologie- und Biodiversitätsforschung. Ziel ist es, ein komplexes Bild ökologischer Prozesse zu zeichnen – und dabei die Rolle von einzelnen Individuen ebenso zu betrachten wie das Zusammenwirken vieler Arten in einem Ökosystem, um die Funktion der Artenvielfalt genauer zu bestimmen. Eine zweite Skizze haben die Kognitionswissenschaften eingereicht. Hier soll das komplexe Nebeneinander von Sprache und Kognition, Entwicklung und Lernen sowie Motivation und Verhalten als dynamisches Miteinander erforscht werden – wobei auch mit den Erziehungswissenschaften kooperiert wird, um verknüpfte Lernund Bildungsprozesse stets mitzudenken. Der dritte Antrag aus den Geo- und Umweltwissenschaften nimmt extreme und besonders folgenschwere Naturgefahren und -prozesse wie Überschwemmungen und Dürren in den Blick. Die Forschenden untersuchen die Extremereignisse mit besonderem Fokus auf deren Wechselwirkung mit der Gesellschaft, um mit ihnen einhergehende Risiken und Schäden besser einschätzen sowie künftig rechtzeitig Maßnahmen einleiten zu können.
„Alle drei Anträge zeichnen ein hervorragendes Bild unserer Leistungsfähigkeit“, betont der Präsident der Universität, Prof. Oliver Günther, Ph.D. „Die Skizzen dokumentieren eindrucksvoll unser Engagement, vorhandene Forschungsexzellenz sowie die Potenziale der Universität Potsdam insgesamt. Allein die Tatsache, dass sich drei schlagkräftige Konsortien in ganz unterschiedlichen Themenbereichen zusammengefunden haben, zeigt, dass wir auf unserem Weg in die Spitzengruppe der deutschen Universitäten einen guten Schritt vorangekommen sind.“
In diesem Heft schauen wir, was sich in und hinter diesen Anträgen verbirgt: Wir haben mit den Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftlern gesprochen, die sie geschrieben haben, und sie gefragt, was sie sich vornehmen, sollten sie den Zuschlag erhalten und ein Cluster an die Universität holen. Wir haben aber auch auf die Forschung geschaut, die zu den Anträgen geführt hat und die schon länger das Profil der Universität prägt und ihr national wie international Anerkennung eingebracht hat. Wir stellen eine kleine Auswahl an Projekten, Methoden und Forschenden vor, um zu zeigen, warum in diesen Anträgen tatsächlich exzellente Forschung steckt! Übrigens: Auch „Exzellenz“ ist nicht das Ende der Fahnenstange. Immerhin lässt sich das Adjektiv exzellent sogar steigern. In diesem Sinne wünschen wir exzellentestes Vergnügen beim Lesen!
Understanding animal movement is essential to elucidate how animals interact, survive, and thrive in a changing world. Recent technological advances in data collection and management have transformed our understanding of animal "movement ecology" (the integrated study of organismal movement), creating a big-data discipline that benefits from rapid, cost-effective generation of large amounts of data on movements of animals in the wild. These high-throughput wildlife tracking systems now allow more thorough investigation of variation among individuals and species across space and time, the nature of biological interactions, and behavioral responses to the environment. Movement ecology is rapidly expanding scientific frontiers through large interdisciplinary and collaborative frameworks, providing improved opportunities for conservation and insights into the movements of wild animals, and their causes and consequences.