CEPA Discussion Papers
ISSN (online) 2628-653X
URN urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-series-954
CEPA Discussion Papers are edited by
Rainald Borck, Lisa Bruttel, Marco Caliendo, Maik Heinemann and Alexander Kritikos.
The CEPA Discussion Papers Series is meant to disseminate recent research results by CEPA members to the scientific community and the interested public. Research findings published in a CEPA Discussion Paper reflect on-going research prior to publication in peer-reviewed journal articles. If you consider submitting an article to CEPA, please look at our submission guidelines.
URN urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-series-954
CEPA Discussion Papers are edited by
Rainald Borck, Lisa Bruttel, Marco Caliendo, Maik Heinemann and Alexander Kritikos.
The CEPA Discussion Papers Series is meant to disseminate recent research results by CEPA members to the scientific community and the interested public. Research findings published in a CEPA Discussion Paper reflect on-going research prior to publication in peer-reviewed journal articles. If you consider submitting an article to CEPA, please look at our submission guidelines.
Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (32)
Document Type
- Working Paper (32)
Language
- English (32)
Keywords
- COVID-19 (3)
- carbon pricing (2)
- entrepreneurship (2)
- experiment (2)
- gender (2)
- mental health (2)
- migration (2)
- self-employment (2)
- Active Labor Market Policy (1)
- Africa (1)
- Backward ownership (1)
- Carbon Capture (1)
- Carbon Dioxide Removal (1)
- Climate Policy (1)
- Covid-19 (1)
- Difference-in-Differences (1)
- E-DSGE (1)
- Employee Training (1)
- Entrepreneurship (1)
- Entry deterrence (1)
- Firm Growth (1)
- Foreclosure (1)
- High growth firms (1)
- Human Capital Investments (1)
- Impermanence (1)
- Innovation (1)
- Institutions (1)
- Job Creation (1)
- Job Search (1)
- Labor Market Mobility (1)
- Manager Decisions (1)
- Minority shareholdings (1)
- PHQ-4 score (1)
- Partial ownership (1)
- Policy Reform (1)
- Push and Pull Theories (1)
- Quality of regional governments (1)
- Regions (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Risk Attitudes (1)
- Search Frictions (1)
- Social Cost of Carbon (1)
- Start-Up Subsidies (1)
- Start-up Motivation (1)
- Survival (1)
- Uniform pricing (1)
- Unintended Consequence (1)
- Vertical integration (1)
- air pollution (1)
- ambiguity attitudes (1)
- behavioral economics (1)
- blended learning (1)
- business services (1)
- carbon debt (1)
- carbon emissions (1)
- carbon price (1)
- carbon removal (1)
- cartel (1)
- childcare provision (1)
- climate (1)
- climate change (1)
- climate policy (1)
- collusion (1)
- communication (1)
- commuting (1)
- crowding out (1)
- decomposition (1)
- decomposition methods (1)
- developing country cities (1)
- discrete choice (1)
- discrimination (1)
- double dividend (1)
- efficiency (1)
- emergency-aid (1)
- energy expenditure (1)
- energy policy (1)
- entrepreneurship policy (1)
- environmental tax reform (1)
- equity crowdfunding (1)
- finance (1)
- financial access and inclusion (1)
- food prices (1)
- gender pay gap (1)
- generalized difference-in-difference (1)
- goal-setting (1)
- gridded data (1)
- habit formation (1)
- hate crime (1)
- home office (1)
- horizontal equity (1)
- human capital (1)
- income (1)
- inequality (1)
- inequality of opportunity (1)
- instrumental variables (1)
- just transition (1)
- labor productivity (1)
- labour migration (1)
- leadership (1)
- linked employer-employee data (1)
- machine learning (1)
- market-entry game (1)
- meta-analysis (1)
- mother’s labor supply (1)
- multi-valued treatment (1)
- natural field experiment (1)
- net-negative emissions (1)
- non-Ricardian households (1)
- obesity (1)
- objective health measures (1)
- physical activity (1)
- pollution (1)
- population density (1)
- primary school (1)
- productivity slowdown (1)
- promises (1)
- property taxes (1)
- public good (1)
- redistribution (1)
- refugees (1)
- removal subsidies (1)
- renewable energy subsidies (1)
- representative longitudinal survey data (1)
- representative real-time survey data (1)
- resilience (1)
- returns to education (1)
- revenue recycling (1)
- risk attitudes (1)
- school health examinations (1)
- self-employed (1)
- soft information (1)
- stag-hunt game (1)
- strategic-uncertainty attitudes (1)
- subjective survival probability (1)
- tax competition (1)
- taxpayer subsidies (1)
- terms-of-trade effects (1)
- trade (1)
- treatment effects (1)
- unilateral climate policy (1)
- vocational education (1)
- voting (1)
- voucher (1)
- wealth (1)
- windfall gains (1)
Institute
- Extern (32) (remove)
25
We investigate how inviting students to set task-based goals affects usage of an online learning platform and course performance. We design and implement a randomized field experiment in a large mandatory economics course with blended learning elements. The low-cost treatment induces students to use the online learning system more often, more intensively, and to begin earlier with exam preparation. Treated students perform better in the course than the control group: they are 18.8% (0.20 SD) more likely to pass the exam and earn 6.7% (0.19 SD) more points on the exam. There is no evidence that treated students spend significantly more time, rather they tend to shift to more productive learning methods. The heterogeneity analysis suggests that higher treatment effects are associated with higher levels of behavioral bias but also with poor early course behavior.
9
Expanding public or publicly subsidized childcare has been a top social policy priority in many industrialized countries. It is supposed to increase fertility, promote children’s development and enhance mothers’ labor market attachment. In this paper, we analyze the causal effect of one of the largest expansions of subsidized childcare for children up to three years among industrialized countries on the employment of mothers in Germany. Identification is based on spatial and temporal variation in the expansion of publicly subsidized childcare triggered by two comprehensive childcare policy reforms. The empirical analysis is based on the German Microcensus that is matched to county level data on childcare availability. Based on our preferred specification which includes time and county fixed effects we find that an increase in childcare slots by one percentage point increases mothers’ labor market participation rate by 0.2 percentage points. The overall increase in employment is explained by the rise in part-time employment with relatively long hours (20-35 hours per week). We do not find a change in full-time employment or lower part-time employment that is causally related to the childcare expansion. The effect is almost entirely driven by mothers with medium-level qualifications. Mothers with low education levels do not profit from this reform calling for a stronger policy focus on particularly disadvantaged groups in coming years.