870 Italische Literaturen; Lateinische Literatur
Refine
Document Type
- Article (13)
- Postprint (7)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (2)
- Review (2)
Keywords
- Historiography (3)
- Tacitus (3)
- 16. Jahrhundert (2)
- Aristoteles-Kommentare (2)
- Enthusiasmus (2)
- Entscheidungsfreiheit (2)
- Geschichtsschreibung (2)
- Inspiration (2)
- Lateinische Literatur (2)
- Latin literature (2)
Institute
www.BrAnD2.Würde.
(2018)
Das Zweite Brandenburger Antike-Denkwerk zielt auf die Zusammenarbeit der Klassischen Philologie der Universität Potsdam mit fünf landesweit ausgewählten Schulen. 2015/6 war das Projekt dem Thema „Würde“ gewidmet. Erste Aspekte beleuchteten Prof. Dr. Claudia Tiersch und PD Dr. Stefan Büttner-von Stülpnagel auf dem Potsdamer Lateintag. Anschließend wurde das Thema von den am Projekt beteiligten Schülerinnen und Schülern unter der Leitung von Prof. Dr. Ursula Gärtner in ganz unterschiedlichen Produkten umgesetzt. Alle diese Beiträge versammelt der vorliegende Band.
Das Projekt wird von der der Robert-Bosch-Stiftung gefördert.
Raumwissen als Raumpolitik?
(2018)
WISSEN MACHT… ?!
(2018)
NIHIL NISI VERITAS
(2018)
Ludus impudentiae!
(2018)
Cave canem
(2021)
So far, animals in fables have almost exclusively been studied as symbolic representatives of human behaviour. New perspectives are opened up by Human-Animal Studies which focus on the animals themselves and human-animal relationships. Inspired by this approach, this article examines five fables of Graeco-Roman antiquity which are connected by the motif of the vicious dog. On the basis of philological interpretation it is shown to what extent and with which intention the dogs are anthropomorphised and at the same time represented as real animals. Interestingly, the human protagonists usually don´t blame the dogs and draw a clear borderline between animals and humans. It seems that successful communication is possible only within the same species.
This article is a discussion of Plin. Ep. 7.29 and Ep. 8.6, in which he presents his reaction to seeing the grave monument of Marcus Antonius Pallas, the freedman and minister of the Emperor Claudius, beside the Via Tiburtina. The monument records a senatorial vote of thanks to Pallas, and Pliny expresses intense indignation at the Senate’s subservience and at the power and influence wielded by a freedman. This article compares Pliny’s letters with Tacitus’ account of the senatorial vote of thanks to Pallas at Ann. 12.52–3 and explores the differences between the ways in which the two authors encourage readers to relate to past events. It is noted that the Pallas letters are unusual amongst Pliny’s let- ters for their treatment of material unconnected with the life and career of Pliny and his friends, and argued that in Ep. 7.29 Pliny uses language and attitudes drawn from satire to evoke the past. Ep. 8.6 is read as an idiosyncratic piece of historical enquiry, consider- ing Pliny’s use of citation and his anonymization of historical individuals. Both letters are considered in the context of the surrounding letters, and a hypothesis is offered regarding the identity of their addressee Montanus, considering evidence from Tacitus’ Histories and Annals. Discussion of Tac. Ann. 12.52–3 focusses on the use of irony. Pliny’s evocation of enargeia (‘vividness’) is compared with that of Tacitus. The article concludes with comparison of the historical accounts offered by Pliny and Tacitus through reflection on Juvenal, Satire 1.