Institut für Romanistik
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (226)
- Part of a Book (37)
- Review (27)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (10)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Other (1)
- Part of Periodical (1)
- Postprint (1)
Keywords
- Geschichte (3)
- Kongress (2)
- Linguistik (2)
- evidentiality (2)
- Adverbs (1)
- Córdoba (1)
- Diskontinuität (1)
- Ferdinand de Saussure (1)
- Funktionale Grammatik (1)
- Grammatik; Syntax; Gebrauch; Universalität; einzelsprachliche Besonderheiten (1)
- Grammatiktheorie (1)
- Hispanistik (1)
- Ideologues (1)
- Kontrastive Linguistik (1)
- Kulturwissenschaften (1)
- Normierung Soziolinguistik (1)
- Orden de las palabras (1)
- Plato´s Cratylus (1)
- Potsdam 2013 (1)
- Romanische Sprachen (1)
- Semantik (1)
- Spanisch (1)
- Sprachbewusstsein (1)
- Syntax (1)
- Terminologie (1)
- Word order (1)
- adverbial locutions (1)
- anachronism (1)
- claridad (1)
- clarity (1)
- conceptual history (1)
- deaf-mutes (1)
- epistemic modality (1)
- filosofía sensualista (1)
- function (1)
- functional unit (1)
- grammar (1)
- grammatography (1)
- inversion (1)
- inversión (1)
- language and abstraction (1)
- language and thought (1)
- lengua hablada (1)
- lenguaje de signos (1)
- lenguaje y abstracción (1)
- linguistic historiography (1)
- meaning (1)
- modal verbs (1)
- modality (1)
- morphological structure (1)
- natural order (1)
- oppositions (1)
- orden natural (1)
- pragmaticalisation (1)
- racionalista (1)
- rationalist (1)
- salon (1)
- scope (1)
- sensualist philosophy (1)
- sign (1)
- sign language (1)
- sistema de escritura universal, concepto, signo, nomenclatura. (1)
- sordomudos (1)
- universal writing system, concept, sign, nomenclature (1)
- word order (1)
- Übersetzungswissenschaft (1)
Institute
La conciencia lingüística y la realidad de la lengua española en el cambio del siglo XVIII al XIX
(2022)
Meaning and Function
(2022)
The use of the word functional in the most diverse theories and approaches has contributed in no small measure to the confusion in linguistics today. This article does not claim to give an overview of the different directions of functionalism in linguistics. Rather, the aim is to present what Coseriu‘s view characterised as functional in his time and to what extent his theory outlined a path that still makes sense in functional-cognitive linguistics today. This will involve an examination of Coseriu‘s difficult-to-identify concept of function. Furthermore, the article will also show that functional thinking is relevant for current grammatography.
The name Ideologues refers to a group of philosophers, psychologists, grammarians, educational theorists and medical specialists who for a short period from 1795 to 1805 determined the intellectual climate in France and sought to develop a science of ideas (idéologie). The Ideologues had a rather reserved attitude to Condillac’s (1714–1780) ideas and his sensualist sign theory. They strove for the perfection of language for the needs of thought and of scientific knowledge. The connections with the Ideologues can also be discerned in Russia. In the educational theory, Jean-Baptiste Maudru (1740–1808) was close to the Ideologues and, despite his insufficient knowledge of the Russian language, made some interesting remarks on the connection between the language and the national character. According to Maudru and in agreement with the Ideologues, different typologies of word order are not just an indication of greater or lesser closeness to the natural order. Rather, they indicate differences in national character, which manifest themselves in the specific character of individual languages. Maudru taught at the military academy in Saint Petersburg and published the first Russian grammar in France (Maudru 1802). In his grammar, he sought to link mechanically the specific features of languages and of national characters with the climatic influences. His attempt to revive the theory of climatic influences was criticized by Karamzin. Karamzin also treated the discussion of the metaphoric extension of word meanings as an absurd undertaking, which had no place in grammar.
The idea of a linguistic worldview was clearly expressed in German national romantic thought of the early 19th century, where language was seen as the expression of the spirit of a nation. Wilhelm von Humboldt argued that every language shaped the world-view of its speakers, but he also saw a possibility to improve human knowledge in the co-action of languages.
The idea of linguistic relativity can be found in John Locke’s statement that words interpose themselves between our understandings and the truth which it would contemplate and apprehend. In the 18th century, we can find formulations that our language accustoms us to arrange our ideas in a specific way, that some languages are more suitable for certain kinds of thought, or that metaphors have significant influence on peoples’ thought. In the 20thcentury the Neo-Humboldtian school revitalised the idea of an influence of language on thought in a reductionist way. At the end of the 20th century, some authors, for example John J. Gumperz and Stephen C. Levinson, tried to rethink linguistic relativity and to prove it by empirical results.