Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (12)
Document Type
- Postprint (12) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (12)
Keywords
- Psychotherapy research (2)
- Simulated patients (2)
- Standardized patients (2)
- Supervision (2)
- Systematic review (2)
- psychotherapeutic competencies (2)
- psychotherapy (2)
- psychotherapy process (2)
- skills (2)
- Clinical psychology (1)
- Clinical supervision (1)
- Education (1)
- Evidence-based psychotherapy (1)
- Feedback (1)
- Obsessive-compulsive disorder (1)
- Psychodiagnostics (1)
- Psychometric properties (1)
- Psychotherapeutic competencies (1)
- Psychotherapeutische Ausbildung (1)
- Psychotherapeutische Kompetenzen (1)
- Psychotherapie (1)
- Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse (1)
- Randomized controlled trial (1)
- Review (1)
- Role-playing (1)
- Screening (1)
- activity preference (1)
- attribution (1)
- client preferences (1)
- clinical supervision (1)
- cognitive-behavioural therapy (1)
- cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) (1)
- consultation (1)
- expectancies (1)
- feedback (1)
- free association (1)
- hypochondriasis (1)
- interview study (1)
- klinische Supervision (1)
- kognitive Verhaltenstherapie (1)
- learning (1)
- measurement (1)
- mental health (1)
- oncology (1)
- preference (1)
- preference assessment (1)
- psycho-oncology (1)
- psychotherapy training (1)
- public involvement (1)
- qualitative content analysis (1)
- role-play (1)
- standardized patient (1)
- therapist competence (1)
- treatment integrity (1)
- validation study (1)
- Übersichtsarbeit (1)
Institute
Theoretischer Hintergrund: Einflüsse von therapeutenorientiertem Kompetenz-Feedback in der Psychotherapieausbildung wurden bislang wenig untersucht.
Fragestellung: Wie gehen Ausbildungstherapeuten mit Feedback um? Welchen Einfluss hat ein regelmäßiges Kompetenz-Feedback auf die Qualität psychotherapeutischer Behandlungen (insbesondere Therapiesitzungen, therapeutische Beziehung, Person des Therapeuten, Supervision)?
Methode: Elf Therapeuten wurden mithilfe eines halbstrukturierten Interviewleitfadens befragt. Die Auswertung erfolgte mittels qualitativer Inhaltsanalyse nach Mayring (2015).
Ergebnisse: Das auf Basis der Interviews erstellte Kategoriensystem umfasste die Kategorien „Erwartungen an das Feedback“, „Wahrnehmung des Feedbacks“, „Verarbeitung von und Umgang mit Feedback“, „Folgen, Auswirkungen und Veränderungen durch Feedback“ sowie „Verbesserungswünsche“.
Schlussfolgerungen: Therapeuten streben eine Umsetzung des Feedbacks an, welches sich auf die Behandlung, die Supervision, die eigene Person und die therapeutische Beziehung auswirkt.
Changes in free symptom attributions in hypochondriasis after cognitive therapy and exposure therapy
(2016)
Background: Cognitive-behavioural therapy can change dysfunctional symptom attributions in patients with hypochondriasis. Past research has used forced-choice answer formats, such as questionnaires, to assess these misattributions; however, with this approach, idiosyncratic attributions cannot be assessed. Free associations are an important complement to existing approaches that assess symptom attributions. Aims: With this study, we contribute to the current literature by using an open-response instrument to investigate changes in freely associated attributions after exposure therapy (ET) and cognitive therapy (CT) compared with a wait list (WL). Method: The current study is a re-examination of a formerly published randomized controlled trial (Weck, Neng, Richtberg, Jakob and Stangier, 2015) that investigated the effectiveness of CT and ET. Seventy-three patients with hypochondriasis were randomly assigned to CT, ET or a WL, and completed a 12-week treatment (or waiting period). Before and after the treatment or waiting period, patients completed an Attribution task in which they had to spontaneously attribute nine common bodily sensations to possible causes in an open-response format. Results: Compared with the WL, both CT and ET reduced the frequency of somatic attributions regarding severe diseases (CT: Hedges's g = 1.12; ET: Hedges's g = 1.03) and increased the frequency of normalizing attributions (CT: Hedges's g = 1.17; ET: Hedges's g = 1.24). Only CT changed the attributions regarding moderate diseases (Hedges's g = 0.69). Changes in somatic attributions regarding mild diseases and psychological attributions were not observed. Conclusions: Both CT and ET are effective for treating freely associated misattributions in patients with hypochondriasis. This study supplements research that used a forced-choice assessment.