Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (13)
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (13)
Language
- English (13)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (13)
Keywords
- Biodiversity Exploratories (2)
- Biodiversity exploratories (2)
- multidiversity (2)
- Agro-ecosystems (1)
- Biodiversity (1)
- Biodiversity indicators (1)
- Coniferous plantations (1)
- Cutting frequency (1)
- Disturbance (1)
- Ellenberg indicator values (1)
- Forest management (1)
- Functional groups (1)
- Grassland management (1)
- Hill numbers (1)
- Land use type (1)
- Land-use impacts (1)
- Livestock density (1)
- Livestock type (1)
- Management intensity (1)
- Meadows (1)
- Nitrogen (1)
- Pastures (1)
- Rank-abundance (1)
- Rarity (1)
- Selection vs. age-class forests (1)
- Shannon diversity (1)
- Silviculture (1)
- Species loss (1)
- Standing biomass (1)
- Typical forest species (1)
- Unmanaged vs. managed forests (1)
- agricultural grasslands (1)
- beta diversity (1)
- biodiversity (1)
- biodiversity exploratories (1)
- biodiversity loss (1)
- common species (1)
- correlation (1)
- dark diversity (1)
- ecosystem function (1)
- fertilization (1)
- forest management (1)
- forest specialists (1)
- gamma diversity (1)
- global change (1)
- grassland management (1)
- grazing (1)
- heterogeneity (1)
- identity hypothesis (1)
- land use (1)
- land-use (1)
- land-use change (1)
- land-use intensity (1)
- mowing (1)
- multitrophic (1)
- multitrophic interactions (1)
- saproxylic beetles (1)
- spatial grain (1)
- specialisation (1)
- species accumulation curve (1)
- species richness (1)
- species turnover (1)
- temperate forests (1)
Institute
Land-use intensification is a major driver of biodiversity loss(1,2). Alongside reductions in local species diversity, biotic homogenization at larger spatial scales is of great concern for conservation. Biotic homogenization means a decrease in beta-diversity (the compositional dissimilarity between sites). Most studies have investigated losses in local (alpha)-diversity(1,3) and neglected biodiversity loss at larger spatial scales. Studies addressing beta-diversity have focused on single or a few organism groups (for example, ref. 4), and it is thus unknown whether land-use intensification homogenizes communities at different trophic levels, above-and belowground. Here we show that even moderate increases in local land-use intensity (LUI) cause biotic homogenization across microbial, plant and animal groups, both above- and belowground, and that this is largely independent of changes in alpha-diversity. We analysed a unique grassland biodiversity dataset, with abundances of more than 4,000 species belonging to 12 trophic groups. LUI, and, in particular, high mowing intensity, had consistent effects on beta-diversity across groups, causing a homogenization of soil microbial, fungal pathogen, plant and arthropod communities. These effects were nonlinear and the strongest declines in beta-diversity occurred in the transition from extensively managed to intermediate intensity grassland. LUI tended to reduce local alpha-diversity in aboveground groups, whereas the alpha-diversity increased in belowground groups. Correlations between the alpha-diversity of different groups, particularly between plants and their consumers, became weaker at high LUI. This suggests a loss of specialist species and is further evidence for biotic homogenization. The consistently negative effects of LUI on landscape-scale biodiversity underscore the high value of extensively managed grasslands for conserving multitrophic biodiversity and ecosystem service provision. Indeed, biotic homogenization rather than local diversity loss could prove to be the most substantial consequence of land-use intensification.
Species diversity promotes the delivery of multiple ecosystem functions (multifunctionality). However, the relative functional importance of rare and common species in driving the biodiversity multifunctionality relationship remains unknown. We studied the relationship between the diversity of rare and common species (according to their local abundances and across nine different trophic groups), and multifunctionality indices derived from 14 ecosystem functions on 150 grasslands across a land use intensity (LUI) gradient. The diversity of above- and below-ground rare species had opposite effects, with rare above-ground species being associated with high levels of multifunctionality, probably because their effects on different functions did not trade off against each other. Conversely, common species were only related to average, not high, levels of multifunctionality, and their functional effects declined with LUI. Apart from the community level effects of diversity, we found significant positive associations between the abundance of individual species and multifunctionality in 6% of the species tested. Species specific functional effects were best predicted by their response to LUI: species that declined in abundance with land use intensification were those associated with higher levels of multifunctionality. Our results highlight the importance of rare species for ecosystem multifunctionality and help guiding future conservation priorities.
Land-use intensification is a key driver of biodiversity change. However, little is known about how it alters relationships between the diversities of different taxonomic groups, which are often correlated due to shared environmental drivers and trophic interactions. Using data from 150 grassland sites, we examined how land-use intensification (increased fertilization, higher livestock densities, and increased mowing frequency) altered correlations between the species richness of 15 plant, invertebrate, and vertebrate taxa. We found that 54% of pairwise correlations between taxonomic groups were significant and positive among all grasslands, while only one was negative. Higher land-use intensity substantially weakened these correlations(35% decrease in rand 43% fewer significant pairwise correlations at high intensity), a pattern which may emerge as a result of biodiversity declines and the breakdown of specialized relationships in these conditions. Nevertheless, some groups (Coleoptera, Heteroptera, Hymenoptera and Orthoptera) were consistently correlated with multidiversity, an aggregate measure of total biodiversity comprised of the standardized diversities of multiple taxa, at both high and lowland-use intensity. The form of intensification was also important; increased fertilization and mowing frequency typically weakened plant-plant and plant-primary consumer correlations, whereas grazing intensification did not. This may reflect decreased habitat heterogeneity under mowing and fertilization and increased habitat heterogeneity under grazing. While these results urge caution in using certain taxonomic groups to monitor impacts of agricultural management on biodiversity, they also suggest that the diversities of some groups are reasonably robust indicators of total biodiversity across a range of conditions.