Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (8)
Year of publication
- 2017 (8) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (8) (remove)
Language
- English (8)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (8)
Keywords
- eye-movement monitoring (2)
- wh-in-situ (2)
- wh-movement (2)
- wh-questions (2)
- Ambiguity resolution (1)
- Bilingual aphasia (1)
- ERPs (1)
- English (1)
- Filled gaps (1)
- German (1)
- L2 processing (1)
- Non-fluent aphasia (1)
- Parasitic gaps (1)
- Sentence processing (1)
- Turkish-German bilingualism (1)
- Wh-movement (1)
- agreement (1)
- antecedent contained deletion (1)
- bilingual sentence processing (1)
- case (1)
- clefts (1)
- discourse-level cues (1)
- focus (1)
- focus-sensitive particles (1)
- information structure (1)
- island constraints (1)
- non-native speakers (1)
- pronoun resolution (1)
- random forest algorithm (1)
- second language processing (1)
- self-paced-reading (1)
- sentence comprehension (1)
Institute
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of healthy aging on the ability to suppress grammatically illicit antecedents during pronoun resolution. Method: In 2 reading-based acceptability-judgment experiments, younger and older speakers of German read sentences containing an object pronoun and 2 potential antecedent noun phrases, only 1 of which was a grammatically licit antecedent. Using a gender-mismatch paradigm, we compared to what extent younger and older speakers were sensitive to feature (mis)matches between the pronoun and either of the 2 antecedents. All participants were fluent readers of German and had finished at least secondary education. Results: Experiment 1 used a self-paced reading paradigm. Older speakers showed greater sensitivity than younger ones to mismatching licit antecedents, but no group showed any evidence of interference from an intervening competitor antecedent. In Experiment 2, we increased the processing demand by using paced word-by-word stimulus presentation and longer sentences. Here, older participants showed reduced sensitivity, in comparison with younger people, to mismatching licit antecedents. Unlike our younger participants, they showed signs of distraction by the presence of a linearly closer but grammatically inappropriate antecedent when no appropriate antecedent was available.
Aims and objectives: Our study addresses the following research questions: To what extent is L2 comprehenders’ online sensitivity to morphosyntactic disambiguation cues affected by L1 background? Does noticing the error signal trigger successful reanalysis in both L1 and L2 comprehension? Can previous findings suggesting that case is a better reanalysis cue than agreement be replicated and extended to L2 processing when using closely matched materials? Design/methodology/approach: We carried out a self-paced reading study using temporarily ambiguous object-initial sentences in German. These were disambiguated either by number marking on the verb or by nominative case marking on the subject. End-of-trial comprehension questions probed whether or not our participants ultimately succeeded in computing the correct interpretation. Data and analysis: We tested a total of 121 participants (25 Italian, 32 Russian, 32 Korean and 32 native German speakers), measuring their word-by-word reading times and comprehension accuracy. The data were analysed using linear mixed-effects and logistic regression modelling. Findings/conclusions: All three learner groups showed online sensitivity to both case and agreement disambiguation cues. Noticing case disambiguations did not necessarily lead to a correct interpretation, whereas noticing agreement disambiguations did. We conclude that intermediate to advanced learners are sensitive to morphosyntactic interpretation cues during online processing regardless of whether or not corresponding grammatical distinctions exist in their L1. Our results also suggest that case is not generally a better reanalysis cue than agreement. Significance/implications: L1 influence on L2 processing is more limited than might be expected. Contra previous findings, even intermediate learners show sensitivity to both agreement and case information during processing.