Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (30)
- Preprint (18)
- Review (10)
- Postprint (9)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (5)
- Other (4)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
- Part of a Book (1)
Language
- English (79) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (79)
Keywords
- Ludwig Leichhardt (3)
- Galang (2)
- Great Britain (2)
- Indigenous knowledges and ontologies (2)
- Sound (2)
- Tupaia (2)
- ancestral remains (2)
- first contact (2)
- indigenous knowledge (2)
- museums and anthropological collections (2)
Institute
The making of Tupaia’s map
(2019)
Tupaia’s Map is one of the most famous and enigmatic artefacts to emerge from the early encounters between Europeans and Pacific Islanders. It was drawn by Tupaia, an arioi priest, chiefly advisor and master navigator from Ra‘iātea in the Leeward Society Islands in collaboration with various members of the crew of James Cook’s Endeavour, in two distinct moments of mapmaking and three draft stages between August 1769 and February 1770. To this day, the identity of many islands on the chart, and the logic of their arrangement have posed a riddle to researchers. Drawing in part on archival material hitherto overlooked, in this long essay we propose a new understanding of the chart’s cartographic logic, offer a detailed reconstruction of its genesis, and thus for the first time present a comprehensive reading of Tupaia’s Map. The chart not only underscores the extent and mastery of Polynesian navigation, it is also a remarkable feat of translation between two very different wayfinding systems and their respective representational models.
Think local sell global
(2010)
Filming illegals
(2013)
Recollecting Bones
(2016)
In the same “guarded, roundabout and reticent way” which Lindsay Barrett invokes for Australian conversations about imperial injustice, Germans, too, must begin to more systematically explore, in Paul Gilroy’s words, “the connections and the differences between anti-semitism and anti-black and other racisms and asses[s] the issues that arise when it can no longer be denied that they interacted over a long time in what might be seen as Fascism’s intellectual, ethical and scientific pre-history” (Gilroy 1996: 26). In the meantime, we need to care for the dead. We need to return them, first, from the status of scientific objects to the status of ancestral human beings, and then progressively, and proactively, as close as possible to the care of those communities from whom they were stolen.