Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (3) (remove)
Year of publication
- 2019 (3) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (1)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (1)
- Part of a Book (1)
Language
- English (3) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3)
Keywords
- Computer Science (1)
- Humanities (1)
- Law (1)
- PPPs (1)
- Politics & International Relations (1)
- Social Sciences (1)
- construction (1)
- court of auditors (1)
- debt ceiling (1)
- economic efficiency (1)
Institute
- Öffentliches Recht (3) (remove)
This chapter aims to analyse whether and how democracy is actually threatened by big-data-based operations and what role international law can play to respond to this possible threat. It shows how big-data-based operations challenge democracy and how international law can help in defending it. The chapter focuses on both state and non-state actors may undermine democracy through big data operations; although democracy as such is a rather underdeveloped concept in international law, which is often more concerned with effectivity than legitimacy – international law protects against these challenges via a democracy-based approach rooted in international human rights law on the one hand, and the principle of non-intervention on the other hand. Thus, although democracy does not play a major role in international law, international law nevertheless is able to protect democracy against challenges from the inside as well as outside.
While public–private partnerships (PPPs) have surged worldwide since the 1990s, they have been met with growing skepticism during the last years. A recent revision of Germany’s constitutional rules on motorway construction and observations on the use of PPPs published by both the German and the European Courts of Auditors illustrate this new caution. These two examples fit into a general trend towards a revival of the public sector, which can be summarized under the cross-level umbrella term “publicization.” It would, however, be remiss to replace the uncritical euphoria that once surrounded privatization with a similarly undifferentiated euphoria regarding publicization. Rather, it is crucial to identify the most appropriate solution for the fulfilment of each public task from the “toolbox” of publicization on the one hand and privatization on the other hand in order to ensure the most effective completion of public functions.