Refine
Year of publication
- 2010 (59) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (32)
- Doctoral Thesis (13)
- Monograph/Edited Volume (9)
- Conference Proceeding (5)
Keywords
- Constraint Solving (2)
- Deduction (2)
- Logic Programming (2)
- Logics (2)
- Optimization (2)
- Planing (2)
- Ausbildung (1)
- Business Process Models (1)
- Compliance (1)
- Didaktik (1)
Institute
- Institut für Informatik und Computational Science (59) (remove)
Die Evaluierung von Lehrveranstaltungen hat in vielen Lehreinrichtungen eine lange Tradition. In diesen klassischen Evaluierungsszenarien werden einmalig pro Semester Umfragebögen an die Studierenden verteilt und anschließend manuell ausgewertet. Die Ergebnisse sind dann zumeist am Ende der Vorlesungszeit vorhanden und geben einen punktuellen Einblick in die Qualität der Lehrveranstaltung bis zum Zeitpunkt der durchgeführten Evaluation. In diesem Artikel stellen wir das Konzept des Rapid Feedback, seine Einsatzmöglichkeiten in universitären Lehrveranstaltungen und eine prototypische Integration in eine koaktive Lern- und Arbeitsumgebung vor.
We introduce a simple approach extending the input language of Answer Set Programming (ASP) systems by multi-valued propositions. Our approach is implemented as a (prototypical) preprocessor translating logic programs with multi-valued propositions into logic programs with Boolean propositions only. Our translation is modular and heavily benefits from the expressive input language of ASP. The resulting approach, along with its implementation, allows for solving interesting constraint satisfaction problems in ASP, showing a good performance.
Companies develop process models to explicitly describe their business operations. In the same time, business operations, business processes, must adhere to various types of compliance requirements. Regulations, e.g., Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, internal policies, best practices are just a few sources of compliance requirements. In some cases, non-adherence to compliance requirements makes the organization subject to legal punishment. In other cases, non-adherence to compliance leads to loss of competitive advantage and thus loss of market share. Unlike the classical domain-independent behavioral correctness of business processes, compliance requirements are domain-specific. Moreover, compliance requirements change over time. New requirements might appear due to change in laws and adoption of new policies. Compliance requirements are offered or enforced by different entities that have different objectives behind these requirements. Finally, compliance requirements might affect different aspects of business processes, e.g., control flow and data flow. As a result, it is infeasible to hard-code compliance checks in tools. Rather, a repeatable process of modeling compliance rules and checking them against business processes automatically is needed. This thesis provides a formal approach to support process design-time compliance checking. Using visual patterns, it is possible to model compliance requirements concerning control flow, data flow and conditional flow rules. Each pattern is mapped into a temporal logic formula. The thesis addresses the problem of consistency checking among various compliance requirements, as they might stem from divergent sources. Also, the thesis contributes to automatically check compliance requirements against process models using model checking. We show that extra domain knowledge, other than expressed in compliance rules, is needed to reach correct decisions. In case of violations, we are able to provide a useful feedback to the user. The feedback is in the form of parts of the process model whose execution causes the violation. In some cases, our approach is capable of providing automated remedy of the violation.
Zusammenfassung: Game-based Learning und Edutainment sind aktuelle Schlagworte im Bereich der Hochschulausbildung. Zunächst verbindet man damit die Integration einer Spiel- und Spaßkultur in die herkömmlichen Lehrveranstaltungen wie Vorlesungen, Übungen, Praktika und Seminare. Die nachfolgenden Ausführungen gehen einer genaueren Begriffsanalyse nach und untersuchen, ob Game-based Learning und Edutainment tatsächlich neuartige Unterrichtsformen erfordern oder neue didaktische Überlegungen in bestehendes Unterrichtsgeschehen bringen – oder ob es nicht doch an einigen Stellen „alter Wein in neuen Schläuchen“ ist.
Preface
(2010)
The workshops on (constraint) logic programming (WLP) are the annual meeting of the Society of Logic Programming (GLP e.V.) and bring together researchers interested in logic programming, constraint programming, and related areas like databases, artificial intelligence and operations research. In this decade, previous workshops took place in Dresden (2008), Würzburg (2007), Vienna (2006), Ulm (2005), Potsdam (2004), Dresden (2002), Kiel (2001), and Würzburg (2000). Contributions to workshops deal with all theoretical, experimental, and application aspects of constraint programming (CP) and logic programming (LP), including foundations of constraint/ logic programming. Some of the special topics are constraint solving and optimization, extensions of functional logic programming, deductive databases, data mining, nonmonotonic reasoning, , interaction of CP/LP with other formalisms like agents, XML, JAVA, program analysis, program transformation, program verification, meta programming, parallelism and concurrency, answer set programming, implementation and software techniques (e.g., types, modularity, design patterns), applications (e.g., in production, environment, education, internet), constraint/logic programming for semantic web systems and applications, reasoning on the semantic web, data modelling for the web, semistructured data, and web query languages.
The workshops on (constraint) logic programming (WLP) are the annual meeting of the Society of Logic Programming (GLP e.V.) and bring together researchers interested in logic programming, constraint programming, and related areas like databases, artificial intelligence and operations research. The 23rd WLP was held in Potsdam at September 15 – 16, 2009. The topics of the presentations of WLP2009 were grouped into the major areas: Databases, Answer Set Programming, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming as well as Constraints and Constraint Handling Rules.
The difference-list technique is described in literature as effective method for extending lists to the right without using calls of append/3. There exist some proposals for automatic transformation of list programs into differencelist programs. However, we are interested in construction of difference-list programs by the programmer, avoiding the need of a transformation step. In [GG09] it was demonstrated, how left-recursive procedures with a dangling call of append/3 can be transformed into right-recursion using the unfolding technique. For simplification of writing difference-list programs using a new cons/2 procedure was introduced. In the present paper, we investigate how efficieny is influenced using cons/2. We measure the efficiency of procedures using accumulator technique, cons/2, DCG’s, and difference lists and compute the resulting speedup in respect to the simple procedure definition using append/3. Four Prolog systems were investigated and we found different behaviour concerning the speedup by difference lists. A result of our investigations is, that an often advice given in the literature for avoiding calls append/3 could not be confirmed in this strong formulation.