Refine
Year of publication
Language
- English (78)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (78)
Keywords
- individual-based model (8)
- Individual-based model (7)
- Climate change (3)
- Risk assessment (3)
- Stage-based model (3)
- biodiversity (3)
- coexistence (3)
- foraging (3)
- intraspecific trait variation (3)
- modeling (3)
- population dynamics (3)
- Apis mellifera (2)
- BEEHAVE (2)
- Biodiversity (2)
- Decision support (2)
- Folsomia candida (2)
- Land use (2)
- Model complexity (2)
- Pattern-oriented modelling (2)
- Population dynamics (2)
- Population viability analysis (2)
- Review (2)
- activity (2)
- agent-based model (2)
- animal personality (2)
- apis mellifera (2)
- behavioral plasticity (2)
- bioenergetics (2)
- colony decline (2)
- colony viability (2)
- community theory (2)
- concepts (2)
- coviability analysis (2)
- crop diversity (2)
- cropping system (2)
- decline (2)
- demographic noise (2)
- ecosystem services provisioning (2)
- ecosystems (2)
- environmental noise (2)
- feedbacks (2)
- forage availability (2)
- forage gaps (2)
- habitat connectivity (2)
- heterogeneity (2)
- honey bees (2)
- individual differences (2)
- individual-based modeling (2)
- landscape generator (2)
- management (2)
- modern coexistence theory (2)
- multiple stressors (2)
- population viability analysis (2)
- predictive systems ecology (2)
- resilience (2)
- rodents (2)
- wildlife corridors (2)
- Agent-based model (1)
- Agent-based models (1)
- Agricultural landscape (1)
- Agricultural landscape generator (1)
- Animal migration (1)
- Avoidance (1)
- Biodiversity experiments (1)
- Biodiversity theory (1)
- Birds (1)
- Boloria eunomia (1)
- Brown trout (1)
- Community model (1)
- Computational modelling (1)
- Conservation management (1)
- Conservation policy (1)
- Copper (1)
- Daphnia (1)
- Daphnia magna (1)
- Decision-making (1)
- Documentation (1)
- Dynamic Energy Budget (1)
- Dynamic energy budget theory (1)
- Eco-evolution (1)
- Eco-genetic modelling (1)
- Ecological models (1)
- Ecological risk assessment (1)
- Ecological theory (1)
- Ecological-economic modelling (1)
- Ecosystem functions and services (1)
- Ecotoxicology (1)
- Effect model (1)
- Environmental change (1)
- Environmental gradients (1)
- European brown (1)
- European lobster (1)
- Female moratorium (1)
- Field pattern (1)
- Foraging (1)
- Forecasting (1)
- Functional traits (1)
- Functional types (1)
- Generic modelling (1)
- Glacial relict species (1)
- Global change (1)
- Good modelling practice (1)
- Habitat choice (1)
- Heterogeneity (1)
- High resolution (1)
- Home range (1)
- IBM (1)
- Individual based model (1)
- Individual-based modelling (1)
- Integrated environmental modelling (1)
- Interdisciplinarity (1)
- Interdisciplinary links (1)
- L-systems (1)
- Landscape of fear (1)
- Landscape simulator (1)
- Lepus europaeus (1)
- Life cycle (1)
- Management (1)
- Marine ecology (1)
- Matrix model (1)
- Mechanistic effect models (1)
- Minimum landing size (1)
- Model analysis (1)
- Model comparison (1)
- Model development (1)
- Model structure (1)
- Model validation (1)
- Monitoring programmes (1)
- Multidimensionality (1)
- NetLogo (1)
- Neutral landscape model (1)
- Next-generation modelling (1)
- ODD (Overview, Design concepts, Details) protocol (1)
- PMoA (1)
- Pattern-oriented modeling (1)
- Persea americana (1)
- Pesticides (1)
- Physiological mode of action (1)
- Population (1)
- Population-based model (1)
- Predator-prey interactions (1)
- Process-based model (1)
- Research needs (1)
- Robustness (1)
- Sea ice (1)
- Sensitivity analysis (1)
- Shrub encroachment (1)
- Social-ecological systems (1)
- Soil ecology (1)
- Soil invertebrates (1)
- Southern Ocean (1)
- Spain (1)
- Stability properties (1)
- Standardization (1)
- Structured population model (1)
- Sub-lethal effects (1)
- TK/TD modelling (1)
- Temporal grain (1)
- Terminology (1)
- Trait-based approach (1)
- Understanding (1)
- Varroa destructor (1)
- Yield per recruit (YPR) (1)
- Yodzis-Innes (1)
- agent-based modelling (1)
- agent-based models (1)
- agriculture (1)
- animal behavior (1)
- animal movement (1)
- asymmetry (1)
- bilinear interpolation (1)
- carbon allocation (1)
- carrion resources (1)
- climate change (1)
- community assembly (1)
- community cytometry (1)
- competition (1)
- competitive ability (1)
- complexity (1)
- connectivity (1)
- corridors (1)
- cross-level interactions (1)
- density dependence (1)
- dispersal success (1)
- disturbance intensity (1)
- disturbance type (1)
- dynamic energy budget (1)
- dynamic energy budget theory (1)
- ecological risk assessment (1)
- ecology (1)
- ecotoxicology (1)
- energy budget (1)
- error avoidance (1)
- extinction (1)
- fitness-maximization (1)
- food structuring (1)
- functional-structural plant model (1)
- global change (1)
- group-living (1)
- habitat suitability models (1)
- hare (1)
- individual-based (1)
- individual-based models (1)
- integrated model (1)
- integrative modelling framework (1)
- invariability (1)
- land use (1)
- land-use change (1)
- large marsh grasshopper (1)
- life history (1)
- metabolic scaling theory (1)
- metacommunity assembly (1)
- microbial (1)
- microbial ecology (1)
- migration (1)
- mitigation measures (1)
- model (1)
- model analysis (1)
- model description (1)
- model development (1)
- model validation (1)
- model verification (1)
- modelling (1)
- modest approach (1)
- movement (1)
- multi-agent simulation (1)
- ontogenetic symmetry (1)
- pace-of-life syndrome (1)
- persistence (1)
- personality (1)
- physiological mode of action (1)
- plant architecture (1)
- plant population and community dynamics (1)
- plant-plant interaction (1)
- polar environment (1)
- prediction (1)
- pulsed resources (1)
- recovery (1)
- reproduction test (1)
- resistance (1)
- review (1)
- scientific communication (1)
- sea turtle (1)
- self-thinning (1)
- single-cell analytics (1)
- sociality (1)
- spatial pattern (1)
- spatially and temporally explicit modelling macroecology (1)
- spatially explicit model (1)
- stability (1)
- standardization (1)
- stress-gradient hypothesis (1)
- symmetry (1)
- trait (1)
- variation (1)
- vultures (1)
Empirical species distribution models (SDMs) constitute often the tool of choice for the assessment of rapid climate change effects on species vulnerability. Conclusions regarding extinction risks might be misleading, however, because SDMs do not explicitly incorporate dispersal or other demographic processes. Here, we supplement SDMs with a dynamic population model 1) to predict climate-induced range dynamics for black grouse in Switzerland, 2) to compare direct and indirect measures of extinction risks, and 3) to quantify uncertainty in predictions as well as the sources of that uncertainty. To this end, we linked models of habitat suitability to a spatially explicit, individual-based model. In an extensive sensitivity analysis, we quantified uncertainty in various model outputs introduced by different SDM algorithms, by different climate scenarios and by demographic model parameters. Potentially suitable habitats were predicted to shift uphill and eastwards. By the end of the 21st century, abrupt habitat losses were predicted in the western Prealps for some climate scenarios. In contrast, population size and occupied area were primarily controlled by currently negative population growth and gradually declined from the beginning of the century across all climate scenarios and SDM algorithms. However, predictions of population dynamic features were highly variable across simulations. Results indicate that inferring extinction probabilities simply from the quantity of suitable habitat may underestimate extinction risks because this may ignore important interactions between life history traits and available habitat. Also, in dynamic range predictions uncertainty in SDM algorithms and climate scenarios can become secondary to uncertainty in dynamic model components. Our study emphasises the need for principal evaluation tools like sensitivity analysis in order to assess uncertainty and robustness in dynamic range predictions. A more direct benefit of such robustness analysis is an improved mechanistic understanding of dynamic species responses to climate change.
Current chemical risk assessment procedures may result in imprecise estimates of risk due to sometimes arbitrary simplifying assumptions. As a way to incorporate ecological complexity and improve risk estimates, mechanistic effect models have been recommended. However, effect modeling has not yet been extensively used for regulatory purposes, one of the main reasons being uncertainty about which model type to use to answer specific regulatory questions. We took an individual-based model (IBM), which was developed for risk assessment of soil invertebrates and includes avoidance of highly contaminated areas, and contrasted it with a simpler, more standardized model, based on the generic metapopulation matrix model RAMAS. In the latter the individuals within a sub-population are not treated as separate entities anymore and the spatial resolution is lower. We explored consequences of model aggregation in terms of assessing population-level effects for different spatial distributions of a toxic chemical. For homogeneous contamination of the soil, we found good agreement between the two models, whereas for heterogeneous contamination, at different concentrations and percentages of contaminated area, RAMAS results were alternatively similar to IBM results with and without avoidance, and different food levels. This inconsistency is explained on the basis of behavioral responses that are included in the IBM but not in RAMAS. Overall, RAMAS was less sensitive than the IBM in detecting population-level effects of different spatial patterns of exposure. We conclude that choosing the right model type for risk assessment of chemicals depends on whether or not population-level effects of small-scale heterogeneity in exposure need to be detected. We recommend that if in doubt, both model types should be used and compared. Describing both models following the same standard format, the ODD protocol, makes them equally transparent and understandable. The simpler model helps to build up trust for the more complex model and can be used for more homogeneous exposure patterns. The more complex model helps detecting and understanding the limitations of the simpler model and is needed to ensure ecological realism for more complex exposure scenarios. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
The potential of ecological models for supporting environmental decision making is increasingly acknowledged. However, it often remains unclear whether a model is realistic and reliable enough. Good practice for developing and testing ecological models has not yet been established. Therefore, TRACE, a general framework for documenting a model's rationale, design, and testing was recently suggested. Originally TRACE was aimed at documenting good modelling practice. However, the word 'documentation' does not convey TRACE's urgency. Therefore, we re-define TRACE as a tool for planning, performing, and documenting good modelling practice. TRACE documents should provide convincing evidence that a model was thoughtfully designed, correctly implemented, thoroughly tested, well understood, and appropriately used for its intended purpose. TRACE documents link the science underlying a model to its application, thereby also linking modellers and model users, for example stakeholders, decision makers, and developers of policies. We report on first experiences in producing TRACE documents. We found that the original idea underlying TRACE was valid, but to make its use more coherent and efficient, an update of its structure and more specific guidance for its use are needed. The updated TRACE format follows the recently developed framework of model 'evaludation': the entire process of establishing model quality and credibility throughout all stages of model development, analysis, and application. TRACE thus becomes a tool for planning, documenting, and assessing model evaludation, which includes understanding the rationale behind a model and its envisaged use. We introduce the new structure and revised terminology of TRACE and provide examples. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. The health of managed and wild honeybee colonies appears to have declined substantially in Europe and the United States over the last decade. Sustainability of honeybee colonies is important not only for honey production, but also for pollination of crops and wild plants alongside other insect pollinators. A combination of causal factors, including parasites, pathogens, land use changes and pesticide usage, are cited as responsible for the increased colony mortality. 2. However, despite detailed knowledge of the behaviour of honeybees and their colonies, there are no suitable tools to explore the resilience mechanisms of this complex system under stress. Empirically testing all combinations of stressors in a systematic fashion is not feasible. We therefore suggest a cross-level systems approach, based on mechanistic modelling, to investigate the impacts of (and interactions between) colony and land management. 3. We review existing honeybee models that are relevant to examining the effects of different stressors on colony growth and survival. Most of these models describe honeybee colony dynamics, foraging behaviour or honeybee - varroa mite - virus interactions. 4. We found that many, but not all, processes within honeybee colonies, epidemiology and foraging are well understood and described in the models, but there is no model that couples in-hive dynamics and pathology with foraging dynamics in realistic landscapes. 5. Synthesis and applications. We describe how a new integrated model could be built to simulate multifactorial impacts on the honeybee colony system, using building blocks from the reviewed models. The development of such a tool would not only highlight empirical research priorities but also provide an important forecasting tool for policy makers and beekeepers, and we list examples of relevant applications to bee disease and landscape management decisions.
Ecologists carry a well-stocked toolbox with a great variety of sampling methods, statistical analyses and modelling tools, and new methods are constantly appearing. Evaluation and optimisation of these methods is crucial to guide methodological choices. Simulating error-free data or taking high-quality data to qualify methods is common practice. Here, we emphasise the methodology of the 'virtual ecologist' (VE) approach where simulated data and observer models are used to mimic real species and how they are 'virtually' observed. This virtual data is then subjected to statistical analyses and modelling, and the results are evaluated against the 'true' simulated data. The VE approach is an intuitive and powerful evaluation framework that allows a quality assessment of sampling protocols, analyses and modelling tools. It works under controlled conditions as well as under consideration of confounding factors such as animal movement and biased observer behaviour. In this review, we promote the approach as a rigorous research tool, and demonstrate its capabilities and practical relevance. We explore past uses of VE in different ecological research fields, where it mainly has been used to test and improve sampling regimes as well as for testing and comparing models, for example species distribution models. We discuss its benefits as well as potential limitations, and provide some practical considerations for designing VE studies. Finally, research fields are identified for which the approach could be useful in the future. We conclude that VE could foster the integration of theoretical and empirical work and stimulate work that goes far beyond sampling methods, leading to new questions, theories, and better mechanistic understanding of ecological systems.
Biodiversity loss is a result of interacting ecological and economic factors, and it must be addressed through an analysis of biodiversity conservation policies. Ecological-economic modelling is a helpful approach to this analysis, but it is also challenging since modellers often have a specific disciplinary background and tend to misrepresent either the ecological or economic aspects. Here, we introduce some of the most important concepts from both disciplines, and since the two modelling cultures also differ between the two disciplines, we present an integrated, consistent guide through all the steps of generic ecological-economic modelling, such as formulation of the research question, development of the conceptual model, model parametrisation and analysis, and interpretation of model results. Although we focus on generic models aimed at a general understanding of causes and remedies for biodiversity loss, the concepts and guidance provided here may also help in the modelling of more specific conservation problems. This guide is aimed at the intersection of three disciplines: ecology, economics and mathematical modelling, and addresses readers who have some knowledge in at least one of these disciplines and want to learn about the others to build and analyse generic ecological-economic models. Compared to textbooks, the guide focuses on the practice of modelling rather than lengthy explanations of theoretical concepts. We attempt to demonstrate that generic ecological-economic modelling does not require magical powers and instead is a manageable exercise.
Females may select a mate based on signalling traits that are believed to accurately correlate with heritable aspects of male quality. Anthropogenic actions, in particular chemicals released into the environment, are now disrupting the accuracy of mating signals to convey information about male quality. The long-term prediction for disrupted mating signals is most commonly loss of female preference. Yet, this prediction has rarely been tested using quantitative models. We use agent-based models to explore the effects of rapid disruption of mating signals. In our model, a gene determines survival. Males signal their level of genetic quality via a signal trait, which females use to select a mate. We allowed this system of sexual selection to become established, before introducing a disruption between the male signal trait and quality, which was similar in nature to that induced by exogenous chemicals. Finally, we assessed the capacity of the system to recover from this disruption. We found that within a relatively short time frame, disruption of mating signals led to a lasting loss of female preference. Decreases in mean viability at the population-level were also observed, because sexual-selection acting against newly arising deleterious mutations was relaxed. The ability of the population to recover from disrupted mating signals was strongly influenced by the mechanisms that promoted or maintained genetic diversity in traits under sexual selection. Our simple model demonstrates that environmental perturbations to the accuracy of male mating signals can result in a long-term loss of female preference for those signals within a few generations. What is more, the loss of this preference can have knock-on consequences for mean population fitness.