Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (77)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (54)
- Article (17)
- Other (3)
- Review (2)
- Course Material (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (77)
Keywords
- Artificial Intelligence Act (1)
- European Union (1)
- Insolvenzmasse (1)
- Private International Law (1)
- Zwangsvollstreckung (1)
- artificial intelligence (1)
- coding and information theory (1)
- comity (1)
- computer science (1)
- cryptology (1)
Institute
- Bürgerliches Recht (74)
- Strafrecht (2)
- Öffentliches Recht (1)
Private international law (PIL) might seem disconnected from peacebuilding and peacekeeping efforts. However, this perception falls short. PIL, contrary to public international law’s direct peacekeeping potential, indirectly contributes to peace by fostering mutual respect between states. The relationship between PIL and peace stems from the recognition and respect states show for each other’s legal systems. PIL operates on the principle of comity, where states acknowledge the applicability of foreign laws to resolve cases. In essence, while PIL’s impact on peace is indirect and modest, its emphasis on mutual respect and fair treatment contributes to peaceful relations between states, making it an important element in the broader context of peacebuilding and peacekeeping efforts. Private international law (PIL) does not determine substantive fairness for parties but focuses on localizing cases at a meta-level of conflict-of-laws. This localization is guided by party, trade, and regulatory interests, and is rooted in neutrality and respect for other legal systems. While the principle of equivalence and neutrality remains foundational in PIL, exceptions and limitations have been established over time to address specific scenarios, ensuring a balanced approach that respects both foreign legal systems and fundamental legal principles.
§2 Anwendungsbereich
(2023)
Dass Technologien wie Machine Learning-Anwendungen oder Big bzw. Smart Data- Verfahren unbedingt Daten in ausreichender Menge und Güte benötigen, erscheint inzwischen als Binsenweisheit. Vor diesem Hintergrund hat insbesondere der EU-Gesetzgeber für sich zuletzt ein neues Betätigungsfeld entdeckt, indem er versucht, auf unterschiedlichen Wegen Anreize zum Datenteilen zu schaffen, um Innovation zu kreieren. Hierzu zählt auch eine geradezu wohltönend mit ,,Datenaltruismus‘‘ verschlagwortete Konstellation. Der Beitrag stellt die diesbezüglichen Regulierungserwägungen auf supranationaler Ebene dar und nimmt eine erste Analyse vor.
On 21 April 2021, the European Commission presented its long-awaited proposal for a Regulation “laying down harmonized rules on Artificial Intelligence”, the so-called “Artificial Intelligence Act” (AIA). This article takes a critical look at the proposed regulation. After an introduction (1), the paper analyzes the unclear preemptive effect of the AIA and EU competences (2), the scope of application (3), the prohibited uses of Artificial Intelligence (AI) (4), the provisions on high-risk AI systems (5), the obligations of providers and users (6), the requirements for AI systems with limited risks (7), the enforcement system (8), the relationship of the AIA with the existing legal framework (9), and the regulatory gaps (10). The last section draws some final conclusions (11).