Das Suchergebnis hat sich seit Ihrer Suchanfrage verändert. Eventuell werden Dokumente in anderer Reihenfolge angezeigt.
  • Treffer 22 von 74
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Acquisition of prosodic focus marking by English, French, and German three-, four-, five- and six-year-olds

  • Previous research on young children's knowledge of prosodic focus marking has revealed an apparent paradox, with comprehension appearing to lag behind production. Comprehension of prosodic focus is difficult to study experimentally due to its subtle and ambiguous contribution to pragmatic meaning. We designed a novel comprehension task, which revealed that three- to six-year-old children show adult-like comprehension of the prosodic marking of subject and object focus. Our findings thus support the view that production does not precede comprehension in the acquisition of focus. We tested participants speaking English, German, and French. All three languages allow prosodic subject and object focus marking, but use additional syntactic marking to varying degrees (English: dispreferred; German: possible; French preferred). French participants produced fewer subject marked responses than English participants. We found no other cross-linguistic differences. Participants interpreted prosodic focus marking similarly and in an adult-likePrevious research on young children's knowledge of prosodic focus marking has revealed an apparent paradox, with comprehension appearing to lag behind production. Comprehension of prosodic focus is difficult to study experimentally due to its subtle and ambiguous contribution to pragmatic meaning. We designed a novel comprehension task, which revealed that three- to six-year-old children show adult-like comprehension of the prosodic marking of subject and object focus. Our findings thus support the view that production does not precede comprehension in the acquisition of focus. We tested participants speaking English, German, and French. All three languages allow prosodic subject and object focus marking, but use additional syntactic marking to varying degrees (English: dispreferred; German: possible; French preferred). French participants produced fewer subject marked responses than English participants. We found no other cross-linguistic differences. Participants interpreted prosodic focus marking similarly and in an adult-like fashion in all three languages.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Kriszta SzendroiORCiD, Carline Bernard, Frauke Berger, Judit GervainORCiD, Barbara HöhleORCiDGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000917000071
ISSN:0305-0009
ISSN:1469-7602
Pubmed ID:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28462765
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch):Journal of child language
Verlag:Cambridge Univ. Press
Verlagsort:New York
Publikationstyp:Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:02.05.2017
Erscheinungsjahr:2017
Datum der Freischaltung:07.04.2022
Band:45
Ausgabe:1
Seitenanzahl:23
Erste Seite:219
Letzte Seite:241
Fördernde Institution:ESF EURO-XPRAG Research Network Program; DFGGerman Research Foundation EFLFrench National Research Agency (ANR) [ANR-10-LABX-0083]
Organisationseinheiten:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften / Department Linguistik
DDC-Klassifikation:4 Sprache / 41 Linguistik / 410 Linguistik
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.