• Treffer 7 von 19
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Does ideology influence the ambition level of climate and renewable energy policy?

  • We investigate whether political ideology has an observable effect on decarbonization ambition, renewable power aims, and preferences for power system balancing technologies in four European countries. Based on the Energy Logics framework, we identify ideologically different transition strategies (state-centered, market-centered, grassroots-centered) contained in government policies and opposition party programs valid in 2019. We compare these policies and programs with citizen poll data. We find that ideology has a small effect: governments and political parties across the spectrum have similar, and relatively ambitious, decarbonization and renewables targets. This mirrors citizens' strong support for ambitious action regardless of their ideological self-description. However, whereas political positions on phasing out fossil fuel power are clear across the policy space, positions on phasing in new flexibility options to balance intermittent renewables are vague or non-existent. As parties and citizens agree on strong climate andWe investigate whether political ideology has an observable effect on decarbonization ambition, renewable power aims, and preferences for power system balancing technologies in four European countries. Based on the Energy Logics framework, we identify ideologically different transition strategies (state-centered, market-centered, grassroots-centered) contained in government policies and opposition party programs valid in 2019. We compare these policies and programs with citizen poll data. We find that ideology has a small effect: governments and political parties across the spectrum have similar, and relatively ambitious, decarbonization and renewables targets. This mirrors citizens' strong support for ambitious action regardless of their ideological self-description. However, whereas political positions on phasing out fossil fuel power are clear across the policy space, positions on phasing in new flexibility options to balance intermittent renewables are vague or non-existent. As parties and citizens agree on strong climate and renewable power aims, the policy ambition is likely to remain high, even if governments change.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

  • zwsr161.pdfeng
    (2427KB)

    SHA-512:8526bd1f72dbdcd288e8ff90419184423b627f86c63db04221a45d233e547726e5e48bda67550b8080301da22e53ef4cb0591a1a1665d18eb877f901b917ea82

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Richard ThonigORCiD, Pablo Del Rio, Christoph Kiefer, Lara Lazaro TouzaORCiD, Gonzalo EscribanoORCiD, Yolanda Lechon, Leonhard Spaeth, Ingo Wolf, Johan LilliestamORCiD
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-577981
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-57798
ISSN:1867-5808
Titel des übergeordneten Werks (Englisch):Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe
Untertitel (Deutsch):Insights from four European countries
Schriftenreihe (Bandnummer):Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe (161)
Publikationstyp:Postprint
Sprache:Englisch
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:16.10.2020
Erscheinungsjahr:2020
Veröffentlichende Institution:Universität Potsdam
Datum der Freischaltung:22.06.2023
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:Union; climate policy; energy policy; europe; european; flexibility; political ideology; renewable energy
Ausgabe:1
Seitenanzahl:19
Quelle:Energy sources, part B: economics, planning, and policy, 16 (2020) 1, pp. 4-22, DOI: 10.1080/15567249.2020.1811806
Fördernde Institution:European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme; [764626]; European Research CouncilEuropean Research Council; (ERC)European Commission [715132]
Organisationseinheiten:Extern / Extern
Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Sozialwissenschaften / Fachgruppe Politik- & Verwaltungswissenschaft
DDC-Klassifikation:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 33 Wirtschaft / 330 Wirtschaft
Peer Review:Referiert
Publikationsweg:Open Access / Green Open-Access
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC-BY-NC-ND - Namensnennung, nicht kommerziell, keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International
Externe Anmerkung:Bibliographieeintrag der Originalveröffentlichung/Quelle
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.