• search hit 9 of 9
Back to Result List

The Pandora's Box of frailty assessments: Which is the best for clinical purposes in TAVI patients? A critical review

  • Frailty assessment is recommended before elective transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to determine post-interventional prognosis. Several studies have investigated frailty in TAVI-patients using numerous assessments; however, it remains unclear which is the most appropriate tool for clinical practice. Therefore, we evaluate which frailty assessment is mainly used and meaningful for ≤30-day and ≥1-year prognosis in TAVI patients. Randomized controlled or observational studies (prospective/retrospective) investigating all-cause mortality in older (≥70 years) TAVI patients were identified (PubMed; May 2020). In total, 79 studies investigating frailty with 49 different assessments were included. As single markers of frailty, mostly gait speed (23 studies) and serum albumin (16 studies) were used. Higher risk of 1-year mortality was predicted by slower gait speed (highest Hazard Ratios (HR): 14.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.50–33.30) and lower serum albumin level (highest HR: 3.12; 95% CI 1.80–5.42). Composite indices (fiveFrailty assessment is recommended before elective transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to determine post-interventional prognosis. Several studies have investigated frailty in TAVI-patients using numerous assessments; however, it remains unclear which is the most appropriate tool for clinical practice. Therefore, we evaluate which frailty assessment is mainly used and meaningful for ≤30-day and ≥1-year prognosis in TAVI patients. Randomized controlled or observational studies (prospective/retrospective) investigating all-cause mortality in older (≥70 years) TAVI patients were identified (PubMed; May 2020). In total, 79 studies investigating frailty with 49 different assessments were included. As single markers of frailty, mostly gait speed (23 studies) and serum albumin (16 studies) were used. Higher risk of 1-year mortality was predicted by slower gait speed (highest Hazard Ratios (HR): 14.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.50–33.30) and lower serum albumin level (highest HR: 3.12; 95% CI 1.80–5.42). Composite indices (five items; seven studies) were associated with 30-day (highest Odds Ratio (OR): 15.30; 95% CI 2.71–86.10) and 1-year mortality (highest OR: 2.75; 95% CI 1.55–4.87). In conclusion, single markers of frailty, in particular gait speed, were widely used to predict 1-year mortality. Composite indices were appropriate, as well as a comprehensive assessment of frailty. View Full-Textshow moreshow less

Download full text files

  • phr765.pdfeng
    (798KB)

    SHA-512:00429bb3dcabc39ba5cc1bcbcdc24c73f4becf2de5064496dc213366ca99aba5b1752733be1ab0496a79e37de375e2d396d18a3a40fed0dc368869c86db37829

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Omar BaritelloORCiD, Annett SalzwedelORCiDGND, Simon SündermannORCiDGND, Josef NiebauerORCiDGND, Heinz VöllerORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-550440
DOI:https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-55044
ISSN:1866-8364
Title of parent work (German):Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe
Publication series (Volume number):Zweitveröffentlichungen der Universität Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe (765)
Publisher:Universitätsverlag Potsdam
Place of publishing:Potsdam
Further contributing person(s):Francesco Donatelli, Micha Maeder, Francesco Formica
Publication type:Postprint
Language:English
Date of first publication:2022/05/30
Publication year:2021
Publishing institution:Universität Potsdam
Granting institution:Universität Potsdam
Release date:2022/05/30
Tag:TAVI; cardiology; elderly; frailty tool; mortality; older patients
Volume:10
Article number:4506
Print run:19
Number of pages:17
First page:1
Last Page:17
Organizational units:Fakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften
DDC classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Peer review:Referiert
Publishing method:Open Access / Green Open-Access
License (German):License LogoCC-BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International
External remark:Bibliographieeintrag der Originalveröffentlichung/Quelle
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.