The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 42 of 2468
Back to Result List

Radiative transfer lattice Boltzmann methods

  • The numerical prediction of radiative transport is a challenging task due to the complexity of the radiative transport equation. We apply the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM), originally developed for fluid flow problems, to solve the radiative transport in volume. One model (meso RTLBM) is derived directly from a discretization of the radiative transport equation, yielding in a precise but numerical costly scheme. The second model (macro RTLBM) solves the Helmholtz equation, which is a proper approximation for highly scattering volumes. Both numerical algorithms are validated against Monte-Carlo data for a set of 35 optical parameters, which correspond to radiative transport ranging from ballistic to diffuse regimes. Together with a set of four benchmark simulations, the comprehensive validation concludes the overall quality and detects asymptotic trends for radiative transport LBM. Furthermore, an accuracy map is presented, which summarizes the error for all parameters. This graph allows to determine the validity range for bothThe numerical prediction of radiative transport is a challenging task due to the complexity of the radiative transport equation. We apply the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM), originally developed for fluid flow problems, to solve the radiative transport in volume. One model (meso RTLBM) is derived directly from a discretization of the radiative transport equation, yielding in a precise but numerical costly scheme. The second model (macro RTLBM) solves the Helmholtz equation, which is a proper approximation for highly scattering volumes. Both numerical algorithms are validated against Monte-Carlo data for a set of 35 optical parameters, which correspond to radiative transport ranging from ballistic to diffuse regimes. Together with a set of four benchmark simulations, the comprehensive validation concludes the overall quality and detects asymptotic trends for radiative transport LBM. Furthermore, an accuracy map is presented, which summarizes the error for all parameters. This graph allows to determine the validity range for both radiative transport LBM at a glance. Finally, comprehensive guidelines are formulated to facilitate the choice of the radiative transport LBM model.show moreshow less

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Albert Mink, Christopher McHardyORCiD, Lena BresselORCiDGND, Cornelia RauhORCiD, Mathias J. KrauseORCiD
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.106810
ISSN:0022-4073
ISSN:1879-1352
Title of parent work (English):Journal of quantitative spectroscopy & radiative transfer
Subtitle (English):3D models and their performance in different regimes of radiative transfer
Publisher:Pergamon Press
Place of publishing:Oxford
Publication type:Article
Language:English
Date of first publication:2019/12/20
Publication year:2019
Release date:2023/10/10
Tag:Analysis scattering kernel; Lattice Boltzmann methods; Monte-Carlo; Optical parameter set; Radiative transport
Volume:243
Article number:106810
Funding institution:Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts Baden-Wurttemberg; DFG; ("Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft") German Research Foundation (DFG)
Organizational units:Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Institut für Chemie
DDC classification:5 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik / 54 Chemie / 540 Chemie und zugeordnete Wissenschaften
Peer review:Referiert
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.