• search hit 1 of 5
Back to Result List

A role of goals for social inhibition of return?

  • The social inhibition of return (sIOR) effect refers to the finding that response initiation times are longer if a movement is executed to a location where another person has responded to just before. Previous studies have examined the influence of the goal of the action on sIOR. In these studies, however, the movement endpoint and to-be-attained goal (e.g., touching/pressing a response key) were at the same spatial location. In the present two experiments, we disentangled movement endpoint and goal's identity and locations by means of introducing action effects that followed directly from a movement. Similar methods were previously shown powerful enough to clearly show the importance of action goals for other phenomena—a finding consistent with effect-based theories of action control, such as the ideomotor theory. The results of the present study revealed that sIOR was shaped by the movement endpoint location, not the goal's identity or location. That is, in both experiments, an sIOR effect was observed, but the magnitude of the sIORThe social inhibition of return (sIOR) effect refers to the finding that response initiation times are longer if a movement is executed to a location where another person has responded to just before. Previous studies have examined the influence of the goal of the action on sIOR. In these studies, however, the movement endpoint and to-be-attained goal (e.g., touching/pressing a response key) were at the same spatial location. In the present two experiments, we disentangled movement endpoint and goal's identity and locations by means of introducing action effects that followed directly from a movement. Similar methods were previously shown powerful enough to clearly show the importance of action goals for other phenomena—a finding consistent with effect-based theories of action control, such as the ideomotor theory. The results of the present study revealed that sIOR was shaped by the movement endpoint location, not the goal's identity or location. That is, in both experiments, an sIOR effect was observed, but the magnitude of the sIOR effect was not modulated by repetitions/switches of goals or their locations. Thus, results indicate that goals play a negligible role in the emergence of the sIOR and, consequently, highlight the importance of action observation for the emergence of the sIOR effect.show moreshow less

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author details:Markus Janczyk, Timothy N. Welsh, Thomas Dolk
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1112417
ISSN:1747-0218
ISSN:1747-0226
Pubmed ID:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26536175
Title of parent work (English):The quarterly journal of experimental psychology
Publisher:Wiley-VCH
Place of publishing:Abingdon
Publication type:Article
Language:English
Year of first publication:2016
Publication year:2016
Release date:2020/03/22
Tag:Action effects; Action goals; Action observation; Ideomotor theory; Joint action; Social inhibition of return
Volume:69
Number of pages:17
First page:2402
Last Page:2418
Funding institution:University of Tubingen; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) [ZUK 63]; Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada
Peer review:Referiert
Institution name at the time of the publication:Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Profilbereich Bildungswissenschaften
Accept ✔
This website uses technically necessary session cookies. By continuing to use the website, you agree to this. You can find our privacy policy here.